- Banned
- #1
Snarky Sack
He, Him, Sir, Dude
Offline
He's not impeached yet, obviously. First step is debating the articles of impeachment, and it has begun.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Never, and not Joe Biden either for this disownment of his granddaughter. Acting trashy has never been grounds for impeachment.
But the threats that Hunter reportedly made with his father in the room? That story isn't dying, and it ain't just Peter Doocy, anymore:
Here is what the WH counsel said that KJP keeps referring the reporters to:
“As we have said many times before, the President was not in business with his son. As we have also said many times before, the Justice Department makes decisions in its criminal investigations independently, and in this case, the White House has not been involved," Sams said Friday. “As the President has said, he loves his son and is proud of him accepting responsibility for his actions and is proud of what he is doing to rebuild his life.”
Hunter Biden's attorney blames his addiction for the whatsapp message:
Counsel to Hunter Biden sought to cast doubt on the whistleblower’s claims in a statement Friday, dismissing questions over the integrity of the probe as a partisan attack and invoking Hunter’s drug addiction to distance the president from the threats by his son.
“Any verifiable words or actions of my client, in the midst of a horrible addiction, are solely his own and have no connection to anyone in his family,” said Chris Clark, adding that the period covered a time of “turmoil and addiction” for the president’s son.
White House responds to claims Biden's son Hunter received preferential treatment
“Nothing has changed,” the White House press secretary said when asked about claims that Hunter Biden invoked his father while pressuring business associates.www.nbcnews.com
Basking in the respect that I'm told that posters on here treat me with.Just more lying bullschlitz. Go back to the board you were claiming that you were going back to. Post debunked excrement while praising a traitor is just a bit, well, stupid.
Who are you really? Just curious.When you support investigating the Trump crime family then you can flip your flap.
The bumbling fool was, is and always will be Trump.Trump was impeached for the Ukraine phone call out of frustration that the long years of the Crossfire Hurricane Operation produced no evidence of collusion by Trump, but did expose the FBI for their criminal investigatory misconduct, and for the extreme bias of their senior leaders.
Not to mentioned showed the Democrats to be abusers of the elderly for their putting Mueller in the position they put him.
The second impeachment was unique in that Trump was impeached for something that other people did, the January 6th riot, and that the House conducted a lengthy prime time impeachment hearing after the impeachment had already failed in the Senate.
Biden's impeachment is revenge for the Trump impeachment. It is kind of amazing that Bobo was able to force the issue to the floor, when most Republicans are so reluctant. Now, it will snowball, with more and more of the Hunter-Joe collusion coming to light.
Impeachments of both Garland and Wray would be entirely appropriate and much more effective. Impeaching Biden will do nothing. He was selected as a bumbling fool who could be easily controlled. Putting Harris in the WH will not change that.
Respect is earned.Basking in the respect that I'm told that posters on here treat me with.
Just a person.Who are you really? Just curious.
Biden tries to get some side boob with Eva Longoria:
I call that a "help yourselfie," where a perv uses a photo op to cop a feel of a woman that he normally would not get in arms reach of. Sadly, women like Eva have to get used to dealing with that. Nice set of reflexes she has.
Actually it is beyond stupid.I thought this was the impeachment thread? This is just stupid.
Biden tries to get some side boob with Eva Longoria:
I call that a "help yourselfie," where a perv uses a photo op to cop a feel of a woman that he normally would not get in arms reach of. Sadly, women like Eva have to get used to dealing with that. Nice set of reflexes she has.
Oof!
The comment about Wesley Snipes.
Does anyone know an innocent explanation for the millions of dollars that were given to the Biden family by Chinese businesses?
The Trumps at least have real things to sell, not just access, and money to lend and buy things.
He got two billion dollars invested into his equity company from a $620 Billion Saudi investment fund that makes such investments regularly.So...since you bring it up, what exactly did ole Jared get $2 billion from the Saudis for?
The Saudis who run that fund objected pretty strenuously to giving Jared that money. He has no experience with this type of fund, and his business record is spotty at best. They were overruled.He got two billion dollars invested into his equity company from a $620 Billion Saudi investment fund that makes such investments regularly.
It wasn't his money to go buy a mansion with. He had a fiduciary responsibility to invest it and try to make it grow for the investers. Likely the equity company charges fees, just like the company that manages my 403b does.
It was not a personal gift to him.
Hunter, on the other hand, simply sets up shell companies for himself and his siblings to be paid through, for absolutely nothing that we know of. As far as we know, none of his companies do anything but accept money, primarily from foreign interests, and pass it on to Biden family members.
He gives 10% to the big guy and has complained about having to also pay other bills for "Pedo Joe," as he calls him.
Sure, they had doubts.The Saudis who run that fund objected pretty strenuously to giving Jared that money. He has no experience with this type of fund, and his business record is spotty at best. They were overruled.
‘Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince, a close ally during the Trump administration, despite objections from the fund’s advisers about the merits of the deal.
A panel that screens investments for the main Saudi sovereign wealth fund cited concerns about the proposed deal with Mr. Kushner’s newly formed private equity firm, Affinity Partners, previously undisclosed documents show.
Those objections included: “the inexperience of the Affinity Fund management”; the possibility that the kingdom would be responsible for “the bulk of the investment and risk”; due diligence on the fledgling firm’s operations that found them “unsatisfactory in all aspects”; a proposed asset management fee that “seems excessive”; and “public relations risks” from Mr. Kushner’s prior role as a senior adviser to his father-in-law, former President Donald J. Trump, according to minutes of the panel’s meeting last June 30.
But days later the full board of the $620 billion Public Investment Fund — led by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s de facto ruler and a beneficiary of Mr. Kushner’s support when he worked as a White House adviser — overruled the panel.”
Before Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big DoubtsBefore Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big Doubts (Published 2022)
Before committing $2 billion to Mr. Kushner’s fledgling firm, officials at a fund led by the Saudi crown prince questioned taking such a big risk.www.nytimes.com
See, this kind of post is why you get pushback around here.Sure, they had doubts.
If they really thought that they were buying Donald Trump as the Chinese bought Joe Biden, and not making an investment, why would they care, much less have doubts, about the fund's asset management inexperience?
They'd be like "It's a bargain to get a whole U.S. president for only two billion dollars!"
Do we have to make it about me?See, this kind of post is why you get pushback around here.
Do we have to keep mistating what I said?I responded politely and with proof to your post about claiming that Jared’s deal didn’t really deserve any scrutiny because of his great prowess in this area.
So it does have to be about me. I guess you cannot help yourself.Your response is to recite unproven and debunked nonsense about Joe Biden. It’s a really emotional response which I seem to see as a pattern from you. Especially when your theories get disproven.
So, why do you think the Saudis invested that money?These are very serious doubts, it was extremely unusual for the Saudis to invest that kind of money with someone as unproven as Jared.
Well, you have evidently spent a great deal of time today bemoaning your treatment on this board and making yourself out a victim of undeserved hostility. (I am just getting home and reading now.) I wanted to point out that your perception of pushback has less to do with your actual views and more to do with the way you present them. Now, I’m not saying your views would ever be agreed with, but your posting style brings on the kind of responses you get, IMO. What I don’t know is if you do it on purpose.Do we have to make it about me?
Do we have to keep mistating what I said?
I never said he had "great prowess, nor did I make any comment at all about his abilities as an investment manager. I just said - in answer to Saint's question - that he was not gifted the money but given managerial responsibility for it.
So it does have to be about me?
So, why do you think the Saudis invested that money?