Special Counsel January 6 conspiracy case against Trump in DC (Update: Trial set for March 4, 2024) (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    You didn’t answer my question, you just posted another opinion on this specific case.

    Where do you get the idea that whenever the Supreme Court takes up a case it means they will find for the plaintiff?
    I'm no legal expert, but I thought they only take up cases where they disagree with the appellate ruling. I could be wrong.

    Either way, it appears that the corruptly obstructing an official proceeding charge that the Biden DOJ has used on January 6th defendants and Trump could be in trouble.
     
    I'm no legal expert, but I thought they only take up cases where they disagree with the appellate ruling. I could be wrong.

    Either way, it appears that the corruptly obstructing an official proceeding charge that the Biden DOJ has used on January 6th defendants and Trump could be in trouble.
    or it could make it 100% legit and really put a hurt him and the others substantially... But when they do rule not in Trumps favor, he'll cry foul as well and you will..
     
    or it could make it 100% legit and really put a hurt him and the others substantially... But when they do rule not in Trumps favor, he'll cry foul as well and you will..
    The case we are talking about doesn't involve Trump directly. It's about a January 6th defendant, but the corruptly obstructing an official proceeding was used against this defendant as well as many others and Trump.
     
    You do realize these guys are just giving their opinion, correct? This isn’t gospel. In fact, they sound idiotic because while a conviction might be possible, there isn’t any way he would ever go to prison before the election because they will appeal.
    Are you upset that they said the plan on TV? Probably best to not admit what they are trying to do right?

    Smith’s contention, which is not a secret, is that the public has a right to see the evidence and the outcome of these court cases before they decide who to vote for in the election. He has put this in numerous court filings. So these guys are just trying to rile you up, and they evidently succeeded. This is on you for being so misinformed about this.

    Smith is correct, BTW. These are serious charges which have a direct bearing on his ability to do the job of being president. All of what happened needs to be put out there for everyone to see.
    So much for the DOJ policy that states that they should never select the timing of the trial to give an advantage to Biden and a disadvantage to Trump in the election right?

     
    Are you upset that they said the plan on TV? Probably best to not admit what they are trying to do right?


    So much for the DOJ policy that states that they should never select the timing of the trial to give an advantage to Biden and a disadvantage to Trump in the election right?


    Trump's campaign never ends. Should that mean he can never be charged with anything?
     
    Are you upset that they said the plan on TV? Probably best to not admit what they are trying to do right?
    Who is they? Honig is a CNN legal analyst. Suddenly, this opinion is valuable when you discount everything else that CNN says? This is why we don’t take you seriously. I already said I wasn’t worried, I’m not upset either. The court will figure it out and this is as it should be.

    What does upset me is the way Trump and his sycophants disrespect the Constitution and the rule of law. It is flat out un-American and is damaging to our country. It should be disqualifying for Trump to ever hold another position of public trust.

    So much for the DOJ policy that states that they should never select the timing of the trial to give an advantage to Biden and a disadvantage to Trump in the election right?
    This is rich. Trump is the one doing everything he can think of to delay every single case against him. All the federal cases would have been over well before any primaries if he hadn’t been asking for delay after delay.
     
    Who is they? Honig is a CNN legal analyst. Suddenly, this opinion is valuable when you discount everything else that CNN says? This is why we don’t take you seriously. I already said I wasn’t worried, I’m not upset either. The court will figure it out and this is as it should be.
    He stated the plan on CNN and talked about the motivations. I don't have to think his opinion is valuable to hear him admit what you and many democrats have claimed isn't the case.
    What does upset me is the way Trump and his sycophants disrespect the Constitution and the rule of law. It is flat out un-American and is damaging to our country. It should be disqualifying for Trump to ever hold another position of public trust.
    You are complaining about disrespecting the Constitution when the Biden Administration has violated the 1st ammendment, forced people to take the Covid vaccine(what happened to Pro-Choice), had his DOJ run cover for Hunter and himself, during a debate told illegal immigrants to immediately surge to the border when he's president, etc
    This is rich. Trump is the one doing everything he can think of to delay every single case against him. All the federal cases would have been over well before any primaries if he hadn’t been asking for delay after delay.
    Nope. As Honig stated in the video, the average time between indictment and trial for average conspiracy and fraud cases is 1 to 1.5 years.

    Jack Smith requested only 5 months between indictment and trial and Honig said it was a much more complex.
     
    Basically you just admitted that you are going from this guy‘s opinion. How can he clue us in on the “plan” if he isn’t part of the team working on the case? This sounds unhinged.
     
    Ruh-Roh. There are taped conversation with MI canvassers to not certify. Both Ronna and Trump on call. They even tell the 2 "we will get you attorneys" ( Trump says " we will take care of that")



     
    It’s good to remember all the crap he did. I’m glad somebody recorded that call. He also tried to get the Michigan legislature to throw out the valid votes and select his electors.

    “In his continuing quest to remain president despite having lost this month’s election, President Donald Trump has been trying to wrest electoral votes away from Joe Biden in states that Biden won. Among the most aggressive tactics that the president might use is a direct appeal to the Republican-controlled legislatures of Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania to hand him those state’s electoral votes.

    On Thursday, the post-election narrative seemed to edge further down that path, as the Republican leaders of Michigan’s two legislative chambers—Senator Mike Shirkey and Representative Lee Chatfield— agreed to take a meeting with the President in Washington tomorrow. Until that point Shirkey and Chatfield were signaling that they didn’t intend to second-guess Michigan’s voters, who chose Biden by more than 150,000 votes. But by taking the White House meeting, they indicated their possible openness to changing their minds.”


    In the end the legislators realized they would be criminally liable if they went along with Trump.
     


    The Detroit News article says that there was a shortfall of about 150 ballots out of over 800,000 votes cast in Wayne County. I think what that means is they had signatures from about 150 people, but no ballots. It’s possible some of them left after signing in and before voting. There was no reason to try to nullify those results. But Trump knew it would be enough to swing the entire state if he could get all those votes thrown out. And he didn’t care how he did it.
     
    In Michigan the specific crime committed was bribery.


    It's what Cheato Jesus should've been impeached for. Why the Dems didn't pick that wording is beyond me. It's like they're allergic to winning.

    Bribery is specifically mentioned in the Constitution. Bribery is a felony crime. Bribery is a short, easily-understood word, perfect for soundbites. Bribery is what Cheato did. He tried to bribe Zelenskyy with weapons in return for an investigation into Biden.

    Just use the damn word, Pelosi! JFC
     


    the woman canvasser lied about the content of the phone call to reporters at the time, and the man has since died. She said Trump just called to make sure she was okay.

    But they never did sign off on the results, so they caved in to Trump. The MI election board ruled that their vote to accept was sufficient, and their signatures weren’t necessary.

    There was no reason to suspect those results. Trump almost got away with taking away the votes of 800,000 voters in Wayne County.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom