I honestly think he's got this disdain for our troops because they're a daily reminder of his time spent in Vietnam.
I didn’t say you were voting for him.
www.cnn.com
www.cnn.comI know why you liked my postBecause I criticized Trump which I have done before. Most of those tweets I post show documents or articles that support what I'm talking about.
It's almost like it was planned and coordinated. It's also interesting to learn that Goldberg was handpicked to help push the narrative for Obama Iran Deal:More to come?
==============
New York (CNN Business)Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, said his magazine's story about Trump calling Americans who died in battle "losers" and "suckers," was just the tip of the iceberg.
"I would fully expect more reporting to come out about this and more confirmation and new pieces of information in the coming days and weeks," Goldberg told CNN's Chief Media Correspondent Brian Stelter on "Reliable Sources" Sunday. "We have a responsibility and we're going to do it regardless of what he says."........
The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief says his story about Trump calling vets ‘losers’ is just the beginning | CNN Business
Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, said his magazine’s story about Trump calling Americans who died in battle “losers” and “suckers,” was just the tip of the iceberg.
Question: If Goldberg's reporting was independently verified by multiple other news sources, unless that independent verification used sources other than the four for Goldberg's article, we should just dismiss Goldberg's reporting?It's almost like it was planned and coordinated. It's also interesting to learn that Goldberg was handpicked to help push the narrative for Obama Iran Deal:
For those in need of more traditional-seeming forms of validation, handpicked Beltway insiders like Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic and Laura Rozen of Al-Monitor helped retail the administration’s narrative.The Aspiring Novelist Who Became Obama’s Foreign-Policy Guru (Published 2016)
How Ben Rhodes rewrote the rules of diplomacy for the digital age.www.nytimes.com
Back in 2016 Goldberg didn't seem to be a fan of anonymous sources:
The author mentioned by name two prominent D.C-based journalists: “For those in need of more traditional-seeming forms of validation, handpicked Beltway insiders like Jeffrey Goldberg of The Atlantic and Laura Rozen of Al-Monitor helped retail the administration’s narrative,” Samuels wrote.
Both rejected Samuels’ implication that they had actively marched in line behind the White House with regards to the deal, dutifully pushing out messaging crafted by Rhodes. Goldberg strongly objected to the assertion that he was “retailing” the deal for the White House and responded in a written piece for The Atlantic. He said he was never contacted by the Times to verify the claim.
“I did not find this mention of my name amusing at all, because Samuels is making a serious, unsourced, and unsubstantiated allegation against me in an otherwise highly credible publication (one for which I happened to work, in fact),” Goldberg wrote in his magazine. “And he did so without disclosing that he holds a longtime personal grudge against me.”
Between this and him pushing the lies to help get us into Iraq, he doesn't sound like a neutral credible journalist:
The Atlantic writer, who himself has been given tremendous access to the White House,
More to come?
==============
New York (CNN Business)Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, said his magazine's story about Trump calling Americans who died in battle "losers" and "suckers," was just the tip of the iceberg.
"I would fully expect more reporting to come out about this and more confirmation and new pieces of information in the coming days and weeks," Goldberg told CNN's Chief Media Correspondent Brian Stelter on "Reliable Sources" Sunday. "We have a responsibility and we're going to do it regardless of what he says."........
The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief says his story about Trump calling vets ‘losers’ is just the beginning | CNN Business
Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, said his magazine’s story about Trump calling Americans who died in battle “losers” and “suckers,” was just the tip of the iceberg.
www.mediaite.com
If the sources couldn't even get a central claim right does that give you much confidence in the rest of the story? Griffin's sources didn't even hear Trump say what they claim. It sounds like a game of telephone.SFL, you’re contending Trump never said any of those things? Because what you are posting doesn’t make me think the original article was wrong in any substantive way. In fact, we said right from the beginning that it could be true that they canceled the helicopter due to weather and it could still be true that Trump said what was alleged. Fact is, Trump wasn’t prevented from going to the cemetery by weather. If he wanted to go he still could have gone. Therefore he didn’t want to go. Plain as that.
If the article is wrong, General Kelly could set the record straight, but he doesn’t. Neither has any other person who has any credibility (meaning any person who hasn’t been known to lie to cover for Trump in the past), except maybe John Bolton, and he said he didn’t hear it but it sounded like something he would say.
This is pretty much beating a dead horse at this point, at least to me. We get it, you don’t believe the story. But you never will. Most people do believe the story. It tracks with his previous comments and his known personality.
Create an account or login to comment
You must be a member in order to leave a comment
Create account
Create an account on our community. It's easy!
Log in
Already have an account? Log in here.
