- Nov 14, 2019
- Reaction score
- Bossier City
Sure...that's fine. When a president, for example, takes some kind of action that he claims is a benefit to the country, there will be those that agree, and there will be those that disagree that it is a benefit.If that is your standard then impeachment is just a political weapon, because the parties routinely disagree on what is a benefit to the U.S.
But, when the president asks a foreign government to announce an investigation into his political opponent, with no real desire (or care) about an actual investigation, so that he can use that announcement to damage his opponent politically...is there anyone who will agree that action is a benefit to the US, as a whole?