brandon
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 17, 2019
- Messages
- 3,121
- Reaction score
- 5,420
Offline
T&P
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So why, if guns are so freaking obvious, don’t we do something about access to guns first and see what happens?Wow, now you are thinking.
I should have known I needed to state the freaking obvious.
I'll do better next time.
But there absolutely was evidence it would work.I really don't care what you reject or accept.
I wonder what would have happened if the doctor who figured out how to use pig valves in humans had simply said "There is no evidence that it is possible so it must not be possible". That is all you're doing. You are denying even the possibility because you see no evidence for it.
Obtuse much?But there absolutely was evidence it would work.
You think they were just like “what if we tried a pig heart LOL?!” and then just started cutting a dude’s chest open?
What do you propose to achieve that goal?So why, if guns are so freaking obvious, don’t we do something about access to guns first and see what happens?
Great! So presumably there’s been some research done on your argument that you can produce so we can review it, right?Obtuse much?
Obviously I don't think that. Thank you for making my PRECISE point. They did not know, so they did research--because they were open to the possibility. What part are you not getting here?
Go play your obtuse game on someone else.Great! So presumably there’s been some research done on your argument that you can produce so we can review it, right?
Or are you saying you’re going to go do the research yourself and report back?
Again, you’re making the claim of possibility. So now you need to back that up.
I really don't care what you reject or accept.
I wonder what would have happened if the doctor who figured out how to use pig valves in humans had simply said "There is no evidence that it is possible so it must not be possible". That is all you're doing. You are denying even the possibility because you see no evidence for it.
Since we’re talking about times when there was less violence - here’s one that actually has a scientific correlation.
Guess what happened between the two red lines:
Well, I’ve written pretty extensively on this in multiple threads, but to keep it short and sweet:What do you propose to achieve that goal?
It’s not an obtuse game. It’s how science works.Go play your obtuse game on someone else.
Adios.It’s not an obtuse game. It’s how science works.
This should help:Scientific Method For Kids With Examples - Little Bins for Little Hands
Using the scientific method with kids is a great way to introduce how to ask questions, set up an experiment, and test results.littlebinsforlittlehands.com
On post #1776, I declare this board independent from your unsupported assertions.Adios.
That will help some, but most folks don't really want to sell their guns.Voluntary gun buyback program at above-market rates.
That's good, too, but doesn't necessarily restrict access to guns in general.Restrict the manufacture and sale of semi-automatic weapons.
Great things too, but not sure how much effect that will have on access.Require licensing to purchase these weapons with mandatory background checks, gun registration, wait times, and yearly qualification training.
(Bugler blowing)On post #1776, I declare this board independent from your unsupported assertions.
Do you consider yourself open minded?When people have ideas or theories or hypotheses, they go out and test them. They gather information and data. They then make their case to the scientific community for evaluation.
You are putting forth a theory with zero evidence and getting pissy when people won't accept it without you doing the legwork. Do you see the difference?
That will help some, but most folks don't really want to sell their guns.
That's good, too, but doesn't necessarily restrict access to guns in general.
Great things too, but not sure how much effect that will have on access.
I would allow for every 2 years of qualification for those between 26 and 55 years old.
Do you consider yourself open minded?
To an extent.To an extent, yes. To quote Tim Minchin: "If you open your mind too much, your brain will fall out."