Nobody was even talking about Covid. The references to the faucet dripping or walls closing was clearly about Trump finally getting into legal trouble. Covid has nothing to do with that.
Hey man, at least give my Liberal forum reply a citation in the footnote, lol.So, this is what it has come to, eh? No low too low, no shallow too shallow to own Liberals. Correction, to attempt to own Liberals. "To own" implies success which this isn't. So, is this supposed to be some retort to "What happens if President Trump loses the election and decides to not leave the office?" Was this supposed to be a classic JE devils advocate/contrary opinion supposition?
Keep in mind the President, as President and then candidate, has twice now not only intimated but flat out said he intends to question the legitimacy of our national election if he loses. Just plainly saying he only loses "if it's rigged" while suggesting he be given a 3rd term.
Trump: 'The only way we're going to lose this election is if the election is rigged'
President Trump on Monday further cast doubt on the U.S. election process, claiming falsely that the only way he would lose in November is if the election is “rigged.”www.google.com
US presidential election is rigged, says Donald Trump – video
Republican presidential candidate says the media are colluding with Hillary Clinton’s campaign and that people who died 10 years ago are casting voteswww.theguardian.com
When asked if he intends to respect the results casually saying, both times, he'll wait to see the results before he decides to respect the results of our free elections, shocking from a candidate, patently un-American from a sitting President.
White House declines to say whether Trump will accept election results if he loses
The president continues to try to undermine confidence in election results reached by mail-in voting.www.google.com
From that, it is a small step, logically, to ask "What if he doesn't leave or what if he fights it?" That question is not without merit and the President, himself, has provided the ammunition to ask it.
Which brings me to the point. What intimation has been provided, what inclination shown, what evidence can be given to show that former Vice President Biden will go on a molestation spree of kids, in general, and specifically if he wins this election? It's so clownish it isn't worth giving legitimacy or credence to. And I'm willing to risk doing just that to call this BS thread out for what it is.
You see, it's this kind of stuff, this BS, as to why I've reached a place where I'm comfortable questioning Trump supporter's character. You all have moved from supporting the man to acting just like him. It's gone from possibly turning a blind eye or disliking the immoral stuff he does to being willing participants in it. It is no longer just tacit support for "his Administration" or "the Republican agenda" but mostly for the man himself. A vociferous defense of any and every thing he does. Which signals to me this is what you all wanted all along. That is what you voted for. The party had a then record 17 persons to choose from and you all overwhelming chose him. Why? Kasich, Rubio, Bush or Cruz wouldn't have "respected abortion" or "appoint Conservative judges"? Of course they would have. But you all wanted something none of those dudes would do.
And that's stoop to this level. Someone who would had "the stones" to say anything, wasn't shackled by the burdens of respecting political norms and customs, someone who wouldn't allow respect of the office to make him bite his tongue or stay his twitter fingers, someone who "wasn't a politician", all for the grand purpose of doing what the hell he wants and saying what the hell he wants. Well, congratulations! And if it seems like that pill is becoming harder and harder to swallow well I would assume it is because you all realize what electing such a man really costs.
What a shameful thread JE. With one click, you've sullied your posting rep and credibility and for what?
It is 100% this.
There is only video evidence of it in this case.Except it fell flat, for the reasons many posted here. Biden isn’t asking questions on Twitter about molesting children, nor is he floating trial balloons about molesting children, while Trump is doing both of those things about accepting the results of the election. So I guess his point is that just because he doesn’t take what Trump says seriously, then we shouldn’t even discuss it? Or something?
But then, he never came back and really fleshed out what he meant, while people in the other thread did say why they were afraid Trump means what he says, and would try to follow through.
Really poor excuse for a thread concept, imho. He’s had no problem critiquing my threads in the past, so I assume it’s okay to critique this one.
Combined with other things - it is evidence for it.
Hey, there are plenty of references to Trump wanting to . . . his daughter on this board. I am not crying about it.In the spirit of ludicrous absurdity, I'll ask the following question with my tongue firmly against my cheek knowing full well Trump won't share:
Do you think Trump would share Ivanka if they tied?
