Here come the GOP budget bills - with March 14 shutdown date approaching (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    superchuck500

    U.S. Blues
    Joined
    Mar 26, 2019
    Messages
    6,463
    Reaction score
    16,091
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Offline
    The GOP in both the House and Senate have released their budget resolutions. Both aim to produce $1.5T to $2T in tax cuts- while slashing spending.

    The Senate budget committee is hearing their resolution today and resolving over 200 proposed amendments.

    The House has released their budge resolution:

    - $4 Trillion debt-ceiling increase
    - Defund Medicaid entirely (effectively)
    - Reduce SNAP by 20%



     
    Rand Paul goes first and says the CR is terrible b/c it doesn't cut enough - but also that Congress shouldn't be ceding its power to the president. He's a No.

    1741980819205.png
    I'll take him being half right over those that are completely wrong. That is how far we have fallen, we are now praising half-arse work.
     
    I'll take him being half right over those that are completely wrong. That is how far we have fallen, we are now praising half-arse work.

    I can deal with someone like that. I disagree with him on policy, but in this case agree with him on process. To me process is more important than specific policy.

    However, I think he is still off on process and sanity in other areas (ie January 6th, pandemic, etc).
     
    Rand Paul goes first and says the CR is terrible b/c it doesn't cut enough - but also that Congress shouldn't be ceding its power to the president. He's a No.

    1741980819205.png
    Great that he is a no. Beyond that he is an idiot. He has no concept of the impact of government spending on the economy or he doesn’t give a schlitz.
     
    I'm not sure why impoundment would be unlawful when it's authorized by duly-passed federal legislation. We have the anti-impoundment act but that, itself, is legislation - so why can't Congress condition funds on executive discretion to impound? Yes, the appropriations power is in the Constitution but if Congress agrees to condition appropriations on executive discretion, I don't see how that's unconstitutional.

    On the tariff provision, it's not just that Congress is ceding its power to cancel the tariffs, it's that Congress is ceding its power to cancel a presidential declaration of emergency. We have already seen Trump completely willing to use emergency powers when there's no actual emergency - so that alone should be highly troubling. You're right that Congress wouldn't block it now, but the problem is that when this becomes law, they can't block it at all until 10/1/2025. Trump could go deep-end bat shirt in May and Congress will have eliminated its power to end the use of these emergency powers through the end of September. Yes, for tariffs but it's broader than that.

    I also question whether changing how days are counted is permissible - why do it that way?

    Simply jumping over to DC home rule with no planning, nothing but this out of the blue, vindictive and punitive budget crushing move, would be an absolute disaster. It's an entire authorization and management shift, that would have to be planned - and the reality is that the GOP doesn't give two shirts about running DC. They want to complain about it but they're not going to run DC. It would be a massive mess.
    Impoundment, to me, goes against one thing and has another problem. The first is that the executive is to execute the laws. This, imo, includes the budget and CRs as well.

    The second is that impoundment is in essence a line item veto. The president does not have that power.

    Impoundment is unconstitutional on its face. If the congress is too gutless to do its job that does not give the president a power he does not have. The same applies to the line item veto.

    Of course, if the Dems can get their limbs moving in the same direction then the SCOTUS would have a case before it. That being said the corrupt SCOTUS might rule any old way they want without regard to anything.
     

    The shutdown would’ve forced law enforcement, the military and all other essential employees to work without pay. A few weeks of that would’ve caused outrage that would’ve put a lot of pressure on Republicans to agree to a clean CR.
     
    The shutdown would’ve forced law enforcement, the military and all other essential employees to work without pay. A few weeks of that would’ve caused outrage that would’ve put a lot of pressure on Republicans to agree to a clean CR.
    Right? How can ownership of a shutdown be due to the dems if they were not allowed input. Furthermore w poison pills that take congressional input out. How often did Republicans call both biden and Obama dictators when republicans completely halt government operations thereby forcing executive orders?

    And we wonder why these Magas continue to threaten shutdown.

    Newsflash, repubs control every branch of the government.
     
    Last edited:

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom