Federal criminal investigation Hunter Biden focuses on his business dealings (Update: DOJ appoints special counsel) (3 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    SaintForLife

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages
    7,313
    Reaction score
    3,404
    Location
    Madisonville
    Offline
    Hunter Biden received a $3.5 million wire transfer from Elena Baturina, the richest woman in Russia and the widow of Yury Luzhkov, the former mayor of Moscow, Senate Republicans revealed in their report on the younger Biden’s work in Ukraine.

    Baturina is referenced in the 87-page report, which was released Wednesday, addressing her payment to Biden’s investment firm in early 2014.

    “Baturina became Russia’s only female billionaire when her plastics company, Inteko, received a series of Moscow municipal contracts while her husband was mayor,” it said in providing background on the businesswoman.

    The report described her involvement with Biden as “a financial relationship,” but declined to delve deeper into why the wire transfer was made.

    The probe also found that Baturina sent 11 wires transfers between May and December 2015 to a bank account belonging to BAK USA, a tech startup that filed for bankruptcy in March 2019.

    Nine of those 11 wire transfers were first sent to Rosemont Seneca Partners, the investment firm founded by Biden and Chris Heinz, stepson of former Secretary of State John Kerry, before being transferred to BAK USA.

    We all know their is massive corruption on both sides of the aisle. Here is an alleged allegation against Hunter Biden who was allegedly enriching himself because his Dad was Vice President.
     
    I'll be impressed when they charge him for the bribes for The big Guy. Until then, this is to give themselves plausible deniability for the well-documented fact that they are going after Trump for being Trump.

    Nice touch, insisting that the gun charge be a felony. Good way to send a message to anyone who owns a stabilizing brace that they legally bought, and thinks that the ATF won't really classify them as felons.
    So..what evidence is there if these “bribes for the big guy”?
     
    I'll be impressed when they charge him for the bribes for The big Guy. Until then, this is to give themselves plausible deniability for the well-documented fact that they are going after Trump for being Trump.

    Nice touch, insisting that the gun charge be a felony. Good way to send a message to anyone who owns a stabilizing brace that they legally bought, and thinks that the ATF won't really classify them as felons.
    The Trump appointed US Attorney investigated him for any illegalities during his time at Burisma and any other activities. There’s nothing there. Quit spouting lies about this stuff - it’s boring and tiresome.
     
    So..what evidence is there if these “bribes for the big guy”?
    Data purportedly from a laptop that allegedly belonged to Hunter Biden included a May 2017 email from one of his business partners laying out how percentages of equity from a proposed venture with a Chinese energy company could be divided. One line of that email asks the question, “10 held by H for the big guy?”
     
    Data purportedly from a laptop that allegedly belonged to Hunter Biden included a May 2017 email from one of his business partners laying out how percentages of equity from a proposed venture with a Chinese energy company could be divided. One line of that email asks the question, “10 held by H for the big guy?”
    You should be laughed out of this place and shamed for all time for referring to that collection of crazy crap that you call the “laptop”. “purportedly” is sure doing a LOT of work in that sentence.

    The “laptop” is a political dirty trick much worse than the Steele Dossier, because nobody made up a fake origin story for that. I’m sure you were apoplectic about the Steele Dossier, but here you are regurgitating worse. It’s okay when your side does it, right?
     
    Data purportedly from a laptop that allegedly belonged to Hunter Biden included a May 2017 email from one of his business partners laying out how percentages of equity from a proposed venture with a Chinese energy company could be divided. One line of that email asks the question, “10 held by H for the big guy?”
    Ok. Let's say, for arguments sake, that email is 100% accurate. In May 2017, Joe Biden was a private citizen. Exactly what law would be violated by private citizen Joe Biden receiving equity in a Chinese energy company?
     
    Ok. Let's say, for arguments sake, that email is 100% accurate. In May 2017, Joe Biden was a private citizen. Exactly what law would be violated by private citizen Joe Biden receiving equity in a Chinese energy company?
    I don't believe that I said that private citizen Joe Biden receiving equity in a Chinese energy company violated a law.

    Are you comfortable with Joe Biden having equity in a Chinese energy company, now that he is president?
     
    I don't believe that I said that private citizen Joe Biden receiving equity in a Chinese energy company violated a law.

    You didn't? You said "I'll be impressed when they charge him for the bribes for The big Guy." That sounds like you were saying you wanted him prosecuted. So, either you were saying that he did something illegal, or you were saying that you wanted him prosecuted for something that was not illegal. Can you explain which of those two it was?

    Are you comfortable with Joe Biden having equity in a Chinese energy company, now that he is president?

    Since the deal apparently did not happen, I don't think Joe Biden owns any equity in a chinese energy company. But, Hunter Biden (who is not, in any way, a US government employee) did divest of his interest in a Chinese investment firm before his father was inaugurated so that there would not be any appearance of impropriety.

     
    You didn't? You said "I'll be impressed when they charge him for the bribes for The big Guy." That sounds like you were saying you wanted him prosecuted. So, either you were saying that he did something illegal, or you were saying that you wanted him prosecuted for something that was not illegal. Can you explain which of those two it was?



    Since the deal apparently did not happen, I don't think Joe Biden owns any equity in a chinese energy company. But, Hunter Biden (who is not, in any way, a US government employee) did divest of his interest in a Chinese investment firm before his father was inaugurated so that there would not be any appearance of impropriety.

    Those pesky facts keep getting in the way, Monte. It’s not fair! Lol
     
    You didn't? You said "I'll be impressed when they charge him for the bribes for The big Guy." That sounds like you were saying you wanted him prosecuted. So, either you were saying that he did something illegal, or you were saying that you wanted him prosecuted for something that was not illegal. Can you explain which of those two it was?

    If you read it in context, it makes sense as an opening to my opinion on why they charged HB and why they chose those particular charges.

    When I said "I'll be impressed when they charge him for the bribes for The big Guy." I meant that I would be impressed if they charged him for the bribes for the Big Guy," not that I ever think that they will.

    Maybe a better question would have been "why will you be impressed by that" rather than spinning your own interpretation and insisting that I take one of your two choices of what I meant.

    I would be impressed by that because I fully expected the DOJ to avoid any charges of Hunter that would implicate his father. If they had charged him with something that did implicate his father, I would be impressed with their willingness to go after a non-Republican, or non-Trump president. Doesn't mean that I would agree with it, but I would rethink my opinion that this is all part of the larger "Operation Get Trump," ongoing for seven years now.

    I was not implying any detailed knowledge of the law, nor access to evidence that no one else has, nor desire that he be prosecuted for one thing rather than another. Any such inferences did not originate with my words.

    If you want to know, I'd prefer at this point that Hunter not be prosecuted for anything at all. Prosecuting the son of a sitting president would undermine confidence not only in the presidency, but also the justice system. If Biden and Hunter are involved in bribery, which seems pretty obvious, the DOJ should turn its evidence over to Congress for action. If and when Congress removes Biden, the DOJ can take its turn.


    Since the deal apparently did not happen, I don't think Joe Biden owns any equity in a chinese energy company. But, Hunter Biden (who is not, in any way, a US government employee) did divest of his interest in a Chinese investment firm before his father was inaugurated so that there would not be any appearance of impropriety.

    They can divest their Chinese equity, by cashing it in or trading it for something else. That does not erase their memory of how generous the Chinese were to them.
     
    Last edited:
    From NBC:

    WASHINGTON — The charges brought against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden are rarely prosecuted, legal experts say.

    Under a plea deal reached with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware — an office headed by Donald Trump appointee David Weiss — Hunter Biden will plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges of failing to pay taxes, which he later reimbursed. Biden also faces a felony gun charge — possession of a firearm by a person who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” — but it is likely to be dismissed if he meets certain conditions under the plea agreement, according to court documents.

    The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists.


    Has the agreement been published? I wonder why no prosecution for lying on the firearms form? Is it cool for anyone to do that?
     
    1687287246907.png
    Ummm, Ben? When Ann Coulter points out Trump stupidity you need to drink a big glass of Please stop!.
     
    From NBC:

    WASHINGTON — The charges brought against President Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden are rarely prosecuted, legal experts say.

    Under a plea deal reached with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Delaware — an office headed by Donald Trump appointee David Weiss — Hunter Biden will plead guilty to two misdemeanor charges of failing to pay taxes, which he later reimbursed. Biden also faces a felony gun charge — possession of a firearm by a person who is an “unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance” — but it is likely to be dismissed if he meets certain conditions under the plea agreement, according to court documents.

    The federal gun charge, which makes it unlawful for a drug addict to possess a weapon, is a rarely used statute that is facing legal challenges and has recently been used as a catch-all charge against white supremacists.


    Has the agreement been published? I wonder why no prosecution for lying on the firearms form? Is it cool for anyone to do that?
    How hypocritical is it for Rs, who are pushing to abolish all firearms registrations, to care about this? I guess there’s no limit to the hypocrisy, is there?
     
    I would be impressed by that because I fully expected the DOJ to avoid any charges of Hunter that would implicate his father. If they had charged him with something that did implicate his father, I would be impressed with their willingness to go after a non-Republican, or non-Trump president.

    So again..you are saying that you be impressed because you expected the DOJ to avoid charging Hunter and his father with something that you admit was not illegal. You expected the DOJ to do the right thing. But then you say that you’d be impressed with them going after a non-republican and charging him with something that is not illegal.


    They can divest their Chinese equity, by cashing it in or trading it for something else. That does not erase their memory of how generous the Chinese were to them.

    So, I have to ask…do you apply that same rationale to the foreign entities that Trump did business with, considering that he still owned the business while he was president?
     
    So again..you are saying that you be impressed because you expected the DOJ to avoid charging Hunter and his father with something that you admit was not illegal. You expected the DOJ to do the right thing. But then you say that you’d be impressed with them going after a non-republican and charging him with something that is not illegal.
    I admitted that bribery is not illegal?
    So, I have to ask…do you apply that same rationale to the foreign entities that Trump did business with, considering that he still owned the business while he was president?
    It is concerning that the Trump's do business with foreigners.

    But the Trumps do business in foreign countries because they own businesses. They have goods and real estate and going companies to sell, money to invest and lend and to buy and sell goods and services, and a history of profit making that long predates Trump taking office. They participate in actual commerce.

    Other than influence, what do the Biden's have to exchange for all the millions of foreign money? Hunter's art talents?
     
    You should be laughed out of this place and shamed for all time for referring to that collection of crazy crap that you call the “laptop”. “purportedly” is sure doing a LOT of work in that sentence.

    The “laptop” is a political dirty trick much worse than the Steele Dossier, because nobody made up a fake origin story for that. I’m sure you were apoplectic about the Steele Dossier, but here you are regurgitating worse. It’s okay when your side does it, right?

    He should be labeled as the troll he is....this guy is as bad or worse than Farb.....geez....
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom