Biden Impeachment Inquiry Hearings (2 Viewers)

[SaintForLife]

Impeachment Inquiry Hearing

 

[efil4]

LOLOLOL "OMGZ See tHe MeDIa is AgHensT uS"

No its because its a joke. And they simply dont want to perpetuate the fraud.

( Unlike the previous televised impeachment hearings )

They should be applauded not lauded. But you keep doin you and trying to make mountains out of mole hills. You will get hip-checked into the boards, and disengage and move on to the next talking points memo you get from your handlers.

Its possible the only thing you are good at.

 

[SaintForLife]

LOLOLOL "OMGZ See tHe MeDIa is AgHensT uS"

No its because its a joke. And they simply dont want to perpetuate the fraud.

( Unlike the previous televised impeachment hearings )

They should be applauded not lauded. But you keep doin you and trying to make mountains out of mole hills. You will get hip-checked into the boards, and disengage and move on to the next talking points memo you get from your handlers.

Its possible the only thing you are good at.

They are running cover for Biden like when the Hunter laptop story was suppressed and censored before the election.

 

[MT15]

Pelosi didn't hold a vote beforehand.

Before the impeachment process begins? She most certainly did.

 

[efil4]

They are running cover for Biden like when the Hunter laptop story was suppressed and censored before the election.

uh huh.

you aint got no tweet to back that up? you came up with that on your own, huh?

it shows.

 

[CoolBrees]

Pelosi didn't hold a vote beforehand.

This is patently false.

 

[superchuck500]

I think Hunter Biden should be impeached

 

[MT15]

if you keep complaining maybe you can get this thread closed like you did for the Hunter Biden thread

I must be living rent free in your head.

but here are the issues -

1. your thread title needs one word added “Inquiry”. That’s it. Yet you are not going to do it. Why?

2. because your first post is a horrible, million tweet long monstrosity - every time anyone opens any page on the thread they have to scroll past all that crap. You’re negatively impacting the experience on here for everyone.

Maybe one of the mods could insert a small post for the first post of the thread? Or just break up that monster first post so that we don’t have to scroll past all of it every time we look at the thread.

SFL - you’re the only one who does this.

 

[SaintForLife]

I must be living rent free in your head.

but here are the issues -

1. your thread title needs one word added “Inquiry”. That’s it. Yet you are not going to do it. Why?

2. because your first post is a horrible, million tweet long monstrosity - every time anyone opens any page on the thread they have to scroll past all that crap. You’re negatively impacting the experience on here for everyone.

Maybe one of the mods could insert a small post for the first post of the thread? Or just break up that monster first post so that we don’t have to scroll past all of it every time we look at the thread.

SFL - you’re the only one who does this.

You are still complaining about things you also do? Here's your own "spamming" post:

Banning books in schools

Excellent article I thought deserved its own thread =========================On the surface, it would appear that book censors and censored authors like myself can agree on one thing: Books are powerful.Particularly books for children and teens.Why else would people like me spend so much...

madaboutpolitics.com

When will you hold yourself to the same standard you demand of me?

You are embarrassing yourself. Constantly complaining about things you also do.

 

[SaintForLife]

Before the impeachment process begins? She most certainly did.

This is patently false.

The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.

Exclusive: Pelosi defends Trump impeachment approach in face of GOP inquiry into Biden | CNN Politics

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday defended her approach to the first impeachment of then-President Donald Trump in 2019, in her first public comments on the Republican effort to launch an inquiry into President Joe Biden.

www.cnn.com

 

[MT15]

You are embarrassing yourself. Constantly complaining about things you also do.

What is embarrassing is your inability to even respond to reasonable requests and reasonable questions. It exposes you for the complete partisan that you are.

This is what is embarrasing. Rs will not even commit to holding their Dear Leader accountable for criminal offenses. Nope the rule of law must be perverted to “get” Dems, but never be used against a Republican. The GOP is just a complete joke now,

 

[MT15]

The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.

Exclusive: Pelosi defends Trump impeachment approach in face of GOP inquiry into Biden | CNN Politics

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday defended her approach to the first impeachment of then-President Donald Trump in 2019, in her first public comments on the Republican effort to launch an inquiry into President Joe Biden.

www.cnn.com

That’s exactly what I said - she held a full vote before they started the actual impeachment process. After McCarthy threw a complete fit and said how horrible it was that she did it this way.

So evidently it isn’t as horrible as he said, or he is being a complete hypocrite now. Which?

 

[brandon]

They are running cover for Biden like when the Hunter laptop story was suppressed and censored before the election.

No, they're simply refusing to allow the GOP to use them as mouthpieces for propaganda.

 

[SaintForLife]

That’s exactly what I said - she held a full vote before they started the actual impeachment process. After McCarthy threw a complete fit and said how horrible it was that she did it this way.

So evidently it isn’t as horrible as he said, or he is being a complete hypocrite now. Which?

The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.

The impeachment inquiry by Pelosi was September 24. The vote was on October 31st. How are you claiming the vote was before the inquiry? The CNN article said the vote was a month after the inquiry.

 

[SaintForLife]

No, they're simply refusing to allow the GOP to use them as mouthpieces for propaganda.

But they allowed the Democrats to use them as mouthpieces for propaganda?

 

[MT15]

The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.

The impeachment inquiry by Pelosi was September 24. The vote was on October 31st. How are you claiming the vote was before the inquiry? The CNN article said the vote was a month after the inquiry.

I never said it was before the inquiry started. what I said was that it was after McCarthy threw his hissy fit about doing it that way and before the official impeachment hearings where articles of impeachment were introduced. Please try to read more carefully.

 

[MT15]

so that tweet is hyperbolic. It was covered on every news program I saw. It just wasn’t covered live. That is NOT a “blackout”.

 

[MT15]

This isn’t the first time that Rs on this committee have fabricated a message to make it look like they have the message when they don’t. All they have in this case is testimony of someone’s recollection of this message, AFAIK, and they make it look like it is the actual message.

Totally dishonest - totally unethical. SFL- you okay with this?

 

[MT15]

Part of the “corruption” is that supposedly Joe has interfered in Hunter’s investigation. Specifically it has been alleged that Biden’s DOJ is responsible for the lack of certain interviews, that they were suppressing interviews. Welp, that one is false. The suppression came in 2020, before Biden was president. It was Rosen’s office and Trump’s DOJ that did that.