Biden Impeachment Inquiry Hearings (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread



    LOLOLOL "OMGZ See tHe MeDIa is AgHensT uS"

    No its because its a joke. And they simply dont want to perpetuate the fraud.

    ( Unlike the previous televised impeachment hearings )

    They should be applauded not lauded. But you keep doin you and trying to make mountains out of mole hills. You will get hip-checked into the boards, and disengage and move on to the next talking points memo you get from your handlers.

    Its possible the only thing you are good at.
     
    LOLOLOL "OMGZ See tHe MeDIa is AgHensT uS"

    No its because its a joke. And they simply dont want to perpetuate the fraud.

    ( Unlike the previous televised impeachment hearings )

    They should be applauded not lauded. But you keep doin you and trying to make mountains out of mole hills. You will get hip-checked into the boards, and disengage and move on to the next talking points memo you get from your handlers.

    Its possible the only thing you are good at.
    They are running cover for Biden like when the Hunter laptop story was suppressed and censored before the election.
     
    if you keep complaining maybe you can get this thread closed like you did for the Hunter Biden thread
    I must be living rent free in your head.

    but here are the issues -

    1. your thread title needs one word added “Inquiry”. That’s it. Yet you are not going to do it. Why?

    2. because your first post is a horrible, million tweet long monstrosity - every time anyone opens any page on the thread they have to scroll past all that crap. You’re negatively impacting the experience on here for everyone.

    Maybe one of the mods could insert a small post for the first post of the thread? Or just break up that monster first post so that we don’t have to scroll past all of it every time we look at the thread.

    SFL - you’re the only one who does this.
     
    I must be living rent free in your head.

    but here are the issues -

    1. your thread title needs one word added “Inquiry”. That’s it. Yet you are not going to do it. Why?

    2. because your first post is a horrible, million tweet long monstrosity - every time anyone opens any page on the thread they have to scroll past all that crap. You’re negatively impacting the experience on here for everyone.

    Maybe one of the mods could insert a small post for the first post of the thread? Or just break up that monster first post so that we don’t have to scroll past all of it every time we look at the thread.

    SFL - you’re the only one who does this.

    You are still complaining about things you also do? Here's your own "spamming" post:


    When will you hold yourself to the same standard you demand of me?
    You are embarrassing yourself. Constantly complaining about things you also do.
     
    Before the impeachment process begins? She most certainly did.
    This is patently false.
    The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.
     
    You are embarrassing yourself. Constantly complaining about things you also do.
    What is embarrassing is your inability to even respond to reasonable requests and reasonable questions. It exposes you for the complete partisan that you are.

    This is what is embarrasing. Rs will not even commit to holding their Dear Leader accountable for criminal offenses. Nope the rule of law must be perverted to “get” Dems, but never be used against a Republican. The GOP is just a complete joke now,

     
    The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.
    That’s exactly what I said - she held a full vote before they started the actual impeachment process. After McCarthy threw a complete fit and said how horrible it was that she did it this way.

    So evidently it isn’t as horrible as he said, or he is being a complete hypocrite now. Which?
     
    They are running cover for Biden like when the Hunter laptop story was suppressed and censored before the election.
    No, they're simply refusing to allow the GOP to use them as mouthpieces for propaganda.
     
    That’s exactly what I said - she held a full vote before they started the actual impeachment process. After McCarthy threw a complete fit and said how horrible it was that she did it this way.

    So evidently it isn’t as horrible as he said, or he is being a complete hypocrite now. Which?
    The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.

    The impeachment inquiry by Pelosi was September 24. The vote was on October 31st. How are you claiming the vote was before the inquiry? The CNN article said the vote was a month after the inquiry.
     
    The House did hold a vote to launch the first impeachment inquiry into Trump, but about a month into probe. Pelosi announced a formal impeachment inquiry on September 24, 2019, but the House did not vote on the matter until October 31.

    The impeachment inquiry by Pelosi was September 24. The vote was on October 31st. How are you claiming the vote was before the inquiry? The CNN article said the vote was a month after the inquiry.
    I never said it was before the inquiry started. what I said was that it was after McCarthy threw his hissy fit about doing it that way and before the official impeachment hearings where articles of impeachment were introduced. Please try to read more carefully.
     
    This isn’t the first time that Rs on this committee have fabricated a message to make it look like they have the message when they don’t. All they have in this case is testimony of someone’s recollection of this message, AFAIK, and they make it look like it is the actual message.

    Totally dishonest - totally unethical. SFL- you okay with this?

     
    Part of the “corruption” is that supposedly Joe has interfered in Hunter’s investigation. Specifically it has been alleged that Biden’s DOJ is responsible for the lack of certain interviews, that they were suppressing interviews. Welp, that one is false. The suppression came in 2020, before Biden was president. It was Rosen’s office and Trump’s DOJ that did that.

     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom