Biden Impeachment Inquiry Hearings (1 Viewer)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
    According to Mary Trump, Trump had labeled Qatar a “funder of terrorism” in 2017 and reversed himself in 2018 calling them a “partner in stopping the funding of terrorism”. What happened in between?

     
    And the corruption of the courts comes into play as well. I couldn’t be more disgusted with this.

     
    FullMonte said:
    Days later? According to the testimony, the $3 million was wired to Robinson Walker on March 1, 2017. So, the meeting was in late February 2017.

    Can you explain what government influence you think Joe Biden was peddling a month after he left office?
    Click to expand...
    Spoiler alert: why, no, he cannot. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
     
    MT15 said:
    Spoiler alert: why, no, he cannot. 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡
    Click to expand...
    Also, he's posted a tweet saying "Biden shows up, gives a 10-minute presentation" while the transcript that's the source for this actually says:

    Q He didn't make any sort of presentation?
    A No, not a presentation. He did not

    Q You said earlier in your testimony that Joe Biden did not give a presentation during -- during his drop-by appearance, correct?
    A That's correct.
    Q Okay. So if someone were to walk out of this room and say that Joe Biden gave a 10-minute presentation to CEFC, that would be misrepresenting your testimony, correct?
    A That is correct.
    Q And it was also your testimony that the $3 million payment had no connection -- it was not connected to Mr. -- I'm sorry -- to Joe Biden's appearance at that lunch, correct?
    A That's correct.
    Q So if someone were to walk out of this room and say that you were paid $3 million because Joe Biden made an appearance at that lunch, that would be misrepresenting your testimony, correct?
    A That's correct.
    Q Okay. And putting this all together, if someone were to walk out of this room, say that Joe Biden gave a 10-minute presentation at that lunch, and that as a result of that presentation, you were paid $3 million, that would be a misstatement of your testimony, correct?
    A That's correct.

    Same every time. Everything they link to doesn't say what they claim it says.
     
    Yeah, one would think that after being burned countless times by posting a tweet from a partisan source who is mis-representing a fact or an article, one would learn to not trust these partisan sources. But he never learns. Never once in all these years.
     
    FullMonte said:
    Days later? According to the testimony, the $3 million was wired to Robinson Walker on March 1, 2017. So, the meeting was in late February 2017.

    Can you explain what government influence you think Joe Biden was peddling a month after he left office?
    Click to expand...
    Playing the long game

    “I’m going to run for president in 2020. I’m going to cheat to win. Then you’ll be on easy street”
     
    Just out of curiosity suppose that the GOP went forward with this impeachment last year and based mostly on this informant’s information successfully voted to impeach

    Then it comes out that not only was the guy lying and full of shirt the shirt was given to him by Russia

    What then?

    Is it vacated? Stricken from the history books like it never happened (like Reggie’s Heisman?)
     
    Optimus Prime said:
    Just out of curiosity suppose that the GOP went forward with this impeachment last year and based mostly on this informant’s information successfully voted to impeach

    Then it comes out that not only was the guy lying and full of shirt the shirt was given to him by Russia

    What then?

    Is it vacated? Stricken from the history books like it never happened (like Reggie’s Heisman?)
    Click to expand...
    No. Democrats would let it stand out of some BS respect for the process or something and the GOP would simply laugh at the idea.
     
    I think the saying is something like “you can’t unring the bell”. Once someone is impeached, they’re impeached.
     
    Republican investigators will visit convicted fraudster and member of the notorious Galanis crime family Jason Galanis in an Alabama prison on Friday in the latest attempt to salvage the impeachment investigation into president Joe Biden, The Independent has learned.

    According to a source, House investigators are headed to Federal Prison Camp Montgomery to interview Galanis, a convicted criminal who is serving a 14-year prison sentence for conspiracy to commit securities fraud, securities fraud, and investment adviser fraud in addition to other crimes.…….

    www.independent.co.uk

    Republicans to interview member of notorious crime family for Biden probe

    Interview with Jason Galanis comes hours after a key source in House Republicans’ impeachment inquiry was arrested for a second time on charges of lying in allegations about the president and his son Hunter Biden
    www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom