- Banned
- #1
SaintForLife
Well-known member
Offline
Trump is alive, but his ear was bleeding
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, I don't. People are saying no one ever takes a head shot to kill but that is just not true depending on the obstructions, shot and protection. I am by no means saying this was not a single shooter/lone crazy wolf situation but to use the shot placement as a means to discredit a theory is just not accurate and it is dishonest.
You think Republican rhetoric influenced him to kill Trump? . What Republican rhetoric would inspire someone to kill their parties nominee?
I've said the failures are so massive that you can't rule out that someone else was involved or helped him.
The development is odd because it suggests that multiple teams appeared to be looking at or toward Crooks who somehow managed to get off a clear shot on Trump.
Out of the four counter-sn*per teams, two were USSS, and two were local teams.
A "local marksman" also engaged but was not the one to fire the fatal shot.
I'm just wondering how there seemed to be multiple sn*per teams looking at Crooks yet he was able to get a perfect shot on Trump.
i don't think it was they key motivation either. he was the school shooter type and saw his chance to one-up the everyday kind of shootings and decided to go big. he probably noticed security was laxed and realized he had his chance.It’s already been said, but a lot of Republicans don’t support Trump. Many of them share the view that he’s a danger to our country. You’ve heard of Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.
But I’m still of the speculative opinion that political differences weren’t the key motivating factor.
The development is odd because it suggests that multiple teams appeared to be looking at or toward Crooks who somehow managed to get off a clear shot on Trump.
Out of the four counter-sn*per teams, two were USSS, and two were local teams.
A "local marksman" also engaged but was not the one to fire the fatal shot.
I'm just wondering how there seemed to be multiple sn*per teams looking at Crooks yet he was able to get a perfect shot on Trump.
chances are if Biden was in town, we'd still be having this conversation..
Possible explanation: confusion combined with not knowing enough about site lines and the amount of time that passed from when Crooks was identified as a confirmed threat by LEO to snipers, exposed himself as a hittable target, and fired shots.
All of this can be traced back to the apparently poor job they did securing the scene and communicating.
You think Republican rhetoric influenced him to kill Trump? . What Republican rhetoric would inspire someone to kill their parties nominee?
Is there even a shred of evidence that anyone's rhetoric inspired the shooter?
I'm not sure if you did it on purpose, but you apparently missed half of a sentence.They do have a photo, it was a bullet, and I've thought so all along.
The wound is consistent with a bullet down to a personally observed fact that I saw the hole in his ear in another photo. A hole in his ear which is almost exactly the diameter of those bullets.
0.225 inches in diameter to be exact.
If that photo showing the bullet is enlarged enough on the screen it's there. That was the first thing I did when I saw that photo and didn't see the bullet they were talking about. A small sized photo doesn't show detail an enlarged photo will.
Why quibble over this???
According to RonnieOkay. But whenever we see his ear again, if we ever do lol, I’m going to be interested in seeing a bullet hole or some sort of damage consistent with it. Until then I will assume Trump is lying. That assumption hasn’t led me astray yet.
Sounds like exactly the type of guy the CIA/SS/NSA/LGB/LSMFT would have hired and sent to their super secret sniper marksman perfect shot training school for this type of plot.Not just that, a 20 year old that was rejected from his highschool rifle team.