All things Racist...USA edition (3 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Farb

    Mostly Peaceful Poster
    Joined
    Oct 1, 2019
    Messages
    6,610
    Reaction score
    2,233
    Age
    49
    Location
    Mobile
    Offline
    I was looking for a place to put this so we could discuss but didn't really find a place that worked so I created this thread so we can all place articles, experiences, videos and examples of racism in the USA.

    This is one that happened this week. The lady even called and filed a complaint on the officer. This officer also chose to wear the body cam (apparently, LA doesn't require this yet). This exchange wasn't necessarily racist IMO until she started with the "mexican racist...you will never be white, like you want" garbage. That is when it turned racist IMO

    All the murderer and other insults, I think are just a by product of CRT and ACAB rhetoric that is very common on the radical left and sadly is being brought to mainstream in this country.

    Another point that I think is worth mentioning is she is a teacher and the sense of entitlement she feels is mind blowing.

    https://news.yahoo.com/black-teacher-berates-latino-la-221235341.html
     
    Did he actually wrestle away control of the tazer?

    The only evidence of that i've seen is the cop screaming at him like a girl to let go of the tazer.
    I know if I am wrestling with a man over control of a weapon in a life or death situation, I would probably sound like a 'girl' too. Big men like you would not though. Tuff.
     
    You’re almost close to getting something. But do they kill more black people than white people proportionally?
    proportionally to the amount of crime committed by a racial group or the make up the population of the racial group?
     
    The police officer didn't need to kill the guy to protect himself. He could have stood up with his weapon pointed at the guy. If the guy runs again, he runs again. Get him later. If when the officer gets up off him with his weapon pointed at him and the guy begins to point the taser at him, if he has it in his hand, then you have an argument, maybe.
    LOL. Or maybe he could have shot him in the leg to wound him or my favorite, fire a warning shot?
    What if the officer let him run and he car jacks a mother, with a kid in the back and kills both in his attempt to get away from the cop. No big deal, right?
     
    So he is automatically guilty for running, but the officer isn't guilty for conviently turning off his body cam before he shot him in the back of the head?
    What is more likly, in the middle of fight for a weapon, the officer made the decision to turn off his body cam or the body cam got turned off by accident in the struggle for a weapon?
     
    LOL. Or maybe he could have shot him in the leg to wound him or my favorite, fire a warning shot?
    What if the officer let him run and he car jacks a mother, with a kid in the back and kills both in his attempt to get away from the cop. No big deal, right?
    You couldn't be any more ridiculous if you tried. Then again you probably are trying.
     
    LOL. Or maybe he could have shot him in the leg to wound him or my favorite, fire a warning shot?
    What if the officer let him run and he car jacks a mother, with a kid in the back and kills both in his attempt to get away from the cop. No big deal, right?
    So it seems like you might be saying that it’s okay to just execute black men who attempt to run from a traffic stop because they might be violent and commit future crimes? Is that what you are saying? Pre-emptive judge, jury and executioner?

    Does it matter to you if there was no history or violence? Or that fleeing might be related to fear of the police? Or perhaps a non-violent charge?

    I don’t think you want that, but I guess I could be wrong about you.
     
    So the onus is on me to prove that something that does not exist actually does not exist? Yeah, no thanks.
    Sadly, I did that exercise here already for the sake of honest dialogue, so feel free to look up those posts.

    So what are you saying doesn’t exist?

    That something is written down in a bank that says “deny loans to blacks, or at least charge them higher interest rates?” I’d agree with that

    Or that racism exists at all? That qualified blacks aren’t being denied loans or paying higher interest?
     
    Last edited:
    So it seems like you might be saying that it’s okay to just execute black men who attempt to run from a traffic stop because they might be violent and commit future crimes? Is that what you are saying? Pre-emptive judge, jury and executioner?

    Does it matter to you if there was no history or violence? Or that fleeing might be related to fear of the police? Or perhaps a non-violent charge?

    I don’t think you want that, but I guess I could be wrong about you.


    "While we acknowledge that some may see the publication of such information as inflammatory, and cite press reports after the killings of other Black men by police officers, we saw the license revocation as important context given the sequence of events in Grand Rapids and that the encounter between Lyoya and the officer deteriorated quickly after the officer asked for Lyoya's license. Our intention was purely journalistic," Bhatia said.

    https://www.freep.com/story/news/po...ya-killing-policy-driving-records/7337515001/
     
    I know if I am wrestling with a man over control of a weapon in a life or death situation, I would probably sound like a 'girl' too. Big men like you would not though. Tuff.

    It was only a life and death situation for the guy who wasn't carrying multiple weapons.
     
    Definitely sounds like this woman shouldn't be a professor
    ======================================

    Several national law student associations are calling for Amy Wax, a University of Pennsylvania Law School professor who for years has espoused openly racist rhetoric, to be suspended from campus and prevented from speaking to students.

    The National Black Law Students Association, the National Asian Pacific American Law Student Association, and the North American South Asian Law Students Association jointly released a letter on Wednesday, shared first with NBC Asian America, condemning Wax’s comments. In recent interviews, Wax has said that the U.S. would be “better off with fewer Asians,” and that “Blacks” and Asians are resentful of Western success.

    “That Wax has been permitted to teach, supervise, and ridicule minority law students for over twenty one years is alarming,” the letter said. “Few understand how much more burdensome law school is for students who continuously receive the message that they are 'less than' or do not belong.”

    The message, co-written by student leaders, enumerates action Penn can take to remedy the situation, including removing Wax from all teaching duties and investigating if her grading of students of color has been fair during her two decades at the school.

    The investigation should be completely transparent to students, the letter says, and Wax should be suspended from campus grounds during the process. According to the law school's website, she's currently teaching two courses.

    “It’s a bit scary thinking about the impact that she’s had teaching at Penn for so long,” Dillon Yang, president of the National Asian Pacific American Law Student Association and a second-year law student at Notre Dame University, told NBC Asian America. “Professors are supposed to teach the law in a neutral way, in ways that law students can form their own thoughts about the law. But clearly she doesn’t hide what she truly feels about the different minority groups in America. It’s hard for me to believe that it wouldn’t shine through in a classroom setting.”..............

     
    I answered it. You're being ridiculous.
    No you didn't, you just called me names. Does the officers responsibility end when the suspect starts to run away or will the officer be responsible if that fleeing suspect kills someone in their escape?
     
    So it seems like you might be saying that it’s okay to just execute black men who attempt to run from a traffic stop because they might be violent and commit future crimes? Is that what you are saying? Pre-emptive judge, jury and executioner?

    Does it matter to you if there was no history or violence? Or that fleeing might be related to fear of the police? Or perhaps a non-violent charge?

    I don’t think you want that, but I guess I could be wrong about you.
    Are you saying police should just surrender their weapons during a struggle?

    The fact that you can use 'fear of police' as a reason to run show how dangerous the completely false narrative of police hunting innocent black man is in todays society. Every time a suspect run due to 'fear' that blood in on the hands of the ACAB and BLM activitist. Got to make that money though
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom