Special Counsel January 6 conspiracy case against Trump in DC (Update: Trial set for March 4, 2024) (1 Viewer)

Indeed

Hey, at least he isn’t beclowning himself like Comer, who was just on Fox.

Ohhhhh, this would be huge, if true. The Jan 6 Committee left her entirely alone, even though she was deep into the fake electors scheme



He deleted it pretty fast:

A different opinion:

More ideas for last 2:

CNN is reporting Chesebro as #5. That just leaves #6 as unknown. WaPo also confirmed Chesebro.

MT15 said:

Click to expand...

To be the first to make the claim...

We now know of 95 members of Congress who are part of the deep state.

This is pretty chilling:

MT15 said:

Click to expand...

Pence’s version of “Burn in hell forker!”

MT15 said:

Click to expand...

To me, there is one simple sharpie line that tells me everything I need to know about that speech.

…….Mr Trump has been charged with three criminal conspiracies – including a conspiracy to deprive Americans’ right to vote and to have their votes counted, a statute rooted in bedrock civil rights protections enacted in the brutal aftermath of the US Civil War.

A crime of conspiracy against rights invokes Section 241 of Title 18 of US Code, among criminal codes that came from the Enforcement Acts, also known as the Ku Klux Klan Acts.

Those laws were designed to protect Americans’ newly enshrined rights under the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments – allowing the federal government to protect the rights of newly enfranchised Black people to vote, hold office, serve on juries and receive equal protection under the law against white supremacist terror.

The legal assault waged by then-President Trump’s campaign to invalidate ballots and overturn election results in states that he lost centered on a handful of counties with large populations of Black and Latino voters, a reminder of the very reason Section 241 was established in the first place in 1870.

Section 241 criminalises conspiracies to “injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person” from exercising such rights, which don’t necessarily require a successful conspiracy to prosecute. Prosecutors also don’t have to prove intentional racist discrimination.

But they do have to prove “intentionality,” Sean Morales-Doyle, director of the voting rights and elections programme at the Brennan Center for Justice at the NYU School of Law, told The Independent. “They have to show that this was a conspiracy intended to deprive people of their right to vote,” he said.

Mr Trump “has a right, like every American, to speak publicly about the election and even to claim, falsely, that there had been outcome-derivative fraud during the election and that he had won,” according to the indictment. He also is entitled to formally challenge the results.……

MT15 said:

This is pretty chilling:

Click to expand...

And there it is.

My hypothetical on SR from 2018 right there in black and white as Trump’s legitimate plan.

If you have the military, it doesn’t matter what the law or the courts say.

That was literally the plan.

Let’s see if Mitch will say this now, or will he weasel out?