The Voting Thread (Procedures, Turnout, Legal Challenges)(Update: Trump to file suit in PA, MI, WI, AZ, NV, GA) (16 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Lapaz

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Sep 28, 2019
    Messages
    2,387
    Reaction score
    2,153
    Age
    62
    Location
    Alabama
    Offline
    There is a lot of push-back from Trump on voting by mail, but most states allow it, and 1/3 allow it without any excuse. His rationale is that it will lead to vast fraud, but of course that isn't his real reason. His real reason is that he thinks it will be worse for conservatives, but studies have shown that states that have instituted much broader voting by mail haven't had any statistical changes in party voting.



    Although, normally voting by mail doesn't affect party votes, I bet it might this year if we have another resurgence of Covid, because I think the right is much more apt to discount the virus than the left. I know that is why Trump is against it.

    Whether you're left or right wing, expanding mail in votes is the right thing to do to reduce the likelihood of spreading the virus, to expand voter participation, and to make it easier for those that do show up to stay distant. It will also allow any people with susceptibilities to remain safer. I think voting by mail could be made extremely secure by having people vote using traditional postal mail, coupled with requiring a confirmation either by phone, email or text. If done by phone, then voters can provide confirmation that can include confirming their form number. If done by email or text, it can include a picture of their form, and then confirmation that that was their form. Rather than staffers individually calling people, this can be automated by having voters call the number, text the number, or email the address provided to them on their form. A website can even be created with a database of those that have voted, and perhaps a link to allow people to confirm their vote was correctly registered. For people without computers, a site can include a means to access the database over the phone with some confirmation information. These types of systems are used extensively by banks and other sites that need security, so I think they are mature enough to use. We could even use such a site for people to confirm their vote on the day of the election.
     
    There were two black guys there.

    That's what I saw too. One ironically wearing a Redskins jersey and another sporting an America First tee. I think anyone wearing an AF shirt should be required to duct tape the word CRAZY above the logo.

    mockup-1ee596eb-768x768.jpg
     
    Steve Scalise is evidently on Fox this morning lying about “concerns” due to “vote swings” that appear after election night.



    I'm appreciative of the fact the my congressman didn't sign on to that stupid suit. I think he might have been the only Republican in the House delegation who didn't.
     
    Last edited:
    The same folks screaming to "Destroy the GOP" will continue to vote straight Republican, but they will now expect those candidates to be even crazier and divorced from reality (and it seems the majority of existing GOP "leaders" are happy to comply).
     
    86A2C25F-9EA7-4A75-9D6E-EB5A07657AD0.jpeg

    That prompted me to read the whole thread (wow... many of you have known each other for a long time!) This take by @zztop aged like a fine wine 👏

    My first thought when I saw this was "hey look at me having an intelligent thought" because I don't consider myself a know-it-all about anything really hah :D

    My second thought was "damn, I wish I was not right" because look how things have unfolded :(

    My third thought was "I miss the old PDB" because there was a lot more participation in the old PDB compared to here

    My fourth thought was "hey, I recognize a lot of those people in that topic" because I seem to only remember people by their avatars. And over here, even if they are the same name vs the old PDB, if they have a different avatar, I don't really attribute them as the same person. (I know that probably sounds strange)
     
    This was the first time I actually read Pascrell's letter to Pelosi about not seating the members of Congress who signed onto the TX suit. Makes all the sense in the world to me. I get that it'd be akin to opening Pandora's box, but what's the point of having these things built in if they're not to be used when the shoe fits?

     
    This was the first time I actually read Pascrell's letter to Pelosi about not seating the members of Congress who signed onto the TX suit. Makes all the sense in the world to me. I get that it'd be akin to opening Pandora's box, but what's the point of having these things built in if they're not to be used when the shoe fits?



    Does the Senate have an equivalent rule?
    Because they have the majority now and I wouldn't put it past McConnell to refuse to seat the two Senators from Georgia should they win.
     
    Does the Senate have an equivalent rule?
    Because they have the majority now and I wouldn't put it past McConnell to refuse to seat the two Senators from Georgia should they win.

    Lol, they'll probably dare Pelosi to do it in order to give the Senate side the ability to do it on their side. That'll be fun.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom