Republicans moving ahead with Trump’s ‘big’ bill of tax breaks (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    zztop

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Feb 5, 2020
    Messages
    3,486
    Reaction score
    4,362
    Location
    in a van down by the river
    Offline

    More than a month after House Republicans surprised Washington by advancing their framework for Trump’s $4.5 trillion in tax breaks and $2 trillion in spending cuts, Senate Republicans voted Thursday to start working on their version. The largely party-line vote, 52-48, sets the stage for a potential Senate all-nighter Friday spilling into the weekend.
     
    The gaslighting is just so hardcore



    the core supporters know little to nothing about Moodys.

    so if they are repeatedly told the downgrade is based on current financials, then thats all they know. ( and believe )

    If they were to take just FIVE minutes, they would find that Moodys rates based on forecasted ( future ) not solely current. So they would then have to reconcile what they are reading with what they are told, and they will defer to told because its their party. So will roll with that.
     

    CFPB

    The legislation seeks to significantly limit funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was established during the Obama administration in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

    As part of its funding structure, the CFPB receives transfers from the Federal Reserve not exceeding a cap set at 12 percent of the Federal Reserve System’s total operating expenses. The GOP-crafted recommendations, if enacted, would significantly reduce the amount of funding the agency can receive from the central bank, setting that cap to 5 percent.

    Democrats have hailed the CFPB as one of the most successful creations of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, praising its aggressive track record of enforcing consumer protection laws. But Republicans have long pressed for measures to rein in the agency, which they have argued has too much power and independence from Congress
     

    CFPB

    The legislation seeks to significantly limit funding for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was established during the Obama administration in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis.

    As part of its funding structure, the CFPB receives transfers from the Federal Reserve not exceeding a cap set at 12 percent of the Federal Reserve System’s total operating expenses. The GOP-crafted recommendations, if enacted, would significantly reduce the amount of funding the agency can receive from the central bank, setting that cap to 5 percent.

    Democrats have hailed the CFPB as one of the most successful creations of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law, praising its aggressive track record of enforcing consumer protection laws. But Republicans have long pressed for measures to rein in the agency, which they have argued has too much power and independence from Congress

    Republicans and their voters hate everything that investigates corruption of the private sector. Whether it's fleecing consumer, destroying the environment or cheating on taxes. They don't want any corruption of the private sector investigated. Or in the public sector when it comes to fellow Republicans.
     
    Gutting clean energy incentives
    The House bill also repeals the Section 25D residential solar tax credit, which has been a critical driver of solar adoption for middle-class families. Without it, installing solar gets way more expensive – and out of reach for many households.

    As Electrek reported last week, solar and wind accounted for almost 98% of new US electrical generating capacity added in Q1 2025, according to new Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) data.

    Solar and wind also made up an impressive 100% of new capacity in March, and March was the 19th consecutive month in which solar was the largest source of new capacity.
     
    Gutting clean energy incentives
    The House bill also repeals the Section 25D residential solar tax credit, which has been a critical driver of solar adoption for middle-class families. Without it, installing solar gets way more expensive – and out of reach for many households.

    As Electrek reported last week, solar and wind accounted for almost 98% of new US electrical generating capacity added in Q1 2025, according to new Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) data.

    Solar and wind also made up an impressive 100% of new capacity in March, and March was the 19th consecutive month in which solar was the largest source of new capacity.
    It just makes no sense to oppose these things.
     
    SALT (state and local tax) deduction:

    Republicans and House Speaker Mike Johnson have come to an agreement to boost the state and local tax deduction to $40K, indicating that one of the last sticking points for President Donald Trump's massive tax cut bill has been resolved, according to media reports.

    The $40K deduction cap is an increase from the $30K in the proposed bill and four times the $10K cap that's currently allowed.

    "I think the SALT caucus, as they call themselves, it’s not everything they wanted, but I think they know what a huge improvement that is for their constituents, and it gives them a lot to go home and talk about," Johnson told CNN
     
    I read it increases spending as well, so wouldn’t that be considered adding to the deficit?
    Net income = revenue - costs.

    Deficit is when net income is < 0; surplus is when net income > 0. Ultimately, it doesn't matter where the imbalance is coming from...we're in a deficit.

     
    The latest CBO score is deficit increase of $3.8T over 10 years.

    And right on cue, MAGA says CBO is leftist


    So, the budget deficit from 2021-2024 was $7.68 trillion.


    $3.8T over 10 years doesn’t seem so horrible.
     
    So, the budget deficit from 2021-2024 was $7.68 trillion.


    $3.8T over 10 years doesn’t seem so horrible.

    The reason its only 3.8T is because they are slashing Medicare and other programs for the poor.

    Still doesn't seem horrible?
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom