Why Would Releasing the 1023 Detailing the Biden Bribery Scheme Endanger the Source? (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Snarky Sack

    He, Him, Sir, Dude
    Joined
    Jun 9, 2023
    Messages
    1,291
    Reaction score
    275
    Age
    62
    Location
    Houston Area
    Offline
    Even if the name of source is redacted?



    This is from the FBI itself, not wild speculation. Providing evidence against the Biden family means risking death. Anyone care to connect the dots, there?

    By saying that, do you think the FBI makes it less likely or more likely that people with knowledge of crimes by senior officials (of any political stripe) will come forward?
     
    Biden did much better in energy policy with the inflation reduction act and the infrastructure act. The Keystone pipeline would only produce jobs for a short term, whereas these acts produce long term jobs.


    Do you have another example?
    Not if you don't accept that one.

    You are not going by the premise of your question.
     
    In case you haven’t realized it yet, America First is a farce. It is Trump First. He doesn’t care about Americans. He cares about himself.
    If that's all you wanted to say, you could have said it without me. You asked for an example of Trump putting America First and BIiden not. I showed you a clear example.

    That is not changed by your believe that Biden later did something even better for America.
     
    If that's all you wanted to say, you could have said it without me. You asked for an example of Trump putting America First and BIiden not. I showed you a clear example.

    That is not changed by your believe that Biden later did something even better for America.

    If Biden canceled the pipeline to protect the environment and reinvest in clean energy that creates long-term jobs, is that not putting America first?
     
    If Biden canceled the pipeline to protect the environment and reinvest in clean energy that creates long-term jobs, is that not putting America first?
    If he did it for those reasons. I have no reason to think he did.

    Here is another source for why he did it:

    Biden canceled the pipeline’s border crossing permit in January over longstanding concerns that burning oil sands crude could make climate change worse and harder to reverse.

     
    If he did it for those reasons. I have no reason to think he did.

    Here is another source for why he did it:

    Biden canceled the pipeline’s border crossing permit in January over longstanding concerns that burning oil sands crude could make climate change worse and harder to reverse.
    If he did it for those reasons. I have no reason to think he did.

    Here is another source for why he did it:

    Biden canceled the pipeline’s border crossing permit in January over longstanding concerns that burning oil sands crude could make climate change worse and harder to reverse.
    The article you linked said exactly what Cuddle said. In other words, it said that it was due to concern for the environment. Later Biden passes an energy bill that would be much better for Americans. The pipeline wasn’t going to make America energy independent. It was Canadian crude, not American crude. Besides, America was a net fossil fuel exported before Trump. Also, it wasn’t Americans that were going to benefit. It was the fossil fuel companies.
     
    Biden cancelled the Keystone Pipeline, eliminating thousands of jobs and reducing our energy independence.


    The stated Reason:

    Biden canceled it in January over longstanding concerns that burning oil sands crude would make climate change worse.
    Climate change is not an "other countries" problem, it is an Earth problem. Climate change is very much a problem for America, because America is part of Earth and there's no way for America to isolate itself from Earth's climate.

    For a matter of fact, Miami (you know Trump's current home greater metropolitan area) is the most vulnerable city and Florida (you know Trump's home state) is the second most vulnerable region to the effects of the climate change being caused primarily by the current and increasing levels of burning fossil fuels.

    New modeling by Resources for the Future, a nonpartisan economic think tank, reveals that “100-year floods” could occur every few years rather than once a century in many locations, endangering an additional 300,000 homes, 2,500 miles of roadways, 30 schools and four hospitals.

    Miami will also become “the most vulnerable major coastal city in the world,” RFF said, with hundreds of billions of dollars in assets under assault from winds, storm surges, coastal flooding and sea-level rise.
    Miami-Dade County and the Tampa Bay region will feel some of the greatest effects from rising seas, for example, which are projected to gain between 8 and 12 inches in elevation by 2040. Nearly a half-million Floridians living less than 3 feet above current high-water levels could experience regular flooding, experts said, threatening $145 billion in real estate value.

    Parts of the Florida Keys, already facing chronic inundation from king tides and modest storms, may need to be abandoned, RFF said. The Florida Panhandle, long assumed to be less vulnerable to climate warming, in fact will see some of the same impacts as other regions, Raimi said.
     
    Last edited:
    If he did it for those reasons. I have no reason to think he did.

    Here is another source for why he did it:

    Biden canceled the pipeline’s border crossing permit in January over longstanding concerns that burning oil sands crude could make climate change worse and harder to reverse.

    This is the first time I can recall you using a legitimate, unbiased source... and you don't realize that it agrees with me. LOL
     
    If he did plead guilty, which he never will. What he will do is have his lawyers negotiate a plea deal as they will certainly advise him to do. He will be a tough bargainer, and the doj will think they can outsmart him. In the end he will plead guilty to nothing most likely. If he does feel guilty to anything, it will be some silly misdemeanor.

    Very appropriate for such a silly case.
    So you think it is silly to keep TS documents, show them and discuss them with people without clearances? They may even be agents of another country.

    Do you believe the Clinton emails being deleted was silly? Do you believe the possession of documents by Pence and Biden was silly?
     
    So you think it is silly to keep TS documents, show them and discuss them with people without clearances? They may even be agents of another country.

    Do you believe the Clinton emails being deleted was silly? Do you believe the possession of documents by Pence and Biden was silly?
    You are much to clever to be understood, sir!

    Give my regards to @J-DONK , who swore to send an avenging sock puppet to troll me.

    I wait in suspense for said sock puppet to appear.
     
    You are much to clever to be understood, sir!

    Give my regards to @J-DONK , who swore to send an avenging sock puppet to troll me.

    I wait in suspense for said sock puppet to appear.
    Nice way to evade. Answer the question. Why is the case against Trump silly? Do you think Robert L. Birchum‘s conviction and 3 year sentence is silly?

     
    Nice way to evade. Answer the question. Why is the case against Trump silly? Do you think Robert L. Birchum‘s conviction and 3 year sentence is silly?

    Not at all.

    Was Birchum a yugely popular candidate for president, front runner in the primary of a major political party?

    If so, I am appalled at such an attack on democracy!

    That you don't ask why I have referred to @J-DONK in two different replies to me, tells me all I need to know.
     
    Not at all.

    Was Birchum a yugely popular candidate for president, front runner in the primary of a major political party?

    If so, I am appalled at such an attack on democracy!

    That you don't ask why I have referred to @J-DONK in two different replies to me, tells me all I need to know.
    You paint yourself into a corner and this is how you try to come out of it?

    Does the rule of law mean anything to you? So being that (according to you) Trump is a "yugely popular candidate", (I lean toward "most imbecilic"), then he should then be above the law? I mean, isn't your party all about the rule of law, or does it only apply when it fits the parties agenda? You know, like if it was Biden being charged instead? That would be cool, right? Because of the Biden Crime family, and all. :rolleyes:
     
    Not at all.

    Was Birchum a yugely popular candidate for president, front runner in the primary of a major political party?

    If so, I am appalled at such an attack on democracy!

    That you don't ask why I have referred to @J-DONK in two different replies to me, tells me all I need to know.
    I’m glad you admitted your hypocrisy. You think Trump is above the law because he is clever enough to know that people like you will let him get away with anything by running for president. You effectively think he should be untouchable, except for some horrific act that you deem crosses the line. Trifling with National security is silly, even though real people can be killed. Others like me want him to be treated as he should be. The law shouldn’t be a popularity contest. If we allow a person to break laws by running for president and he has fooled enough people into supporting him, then there will be no barriers for such a person to destroy the country.

    The fact is that the document retention and obstruction case against Trump is not silly. Such actions are very dangerous, and we must not allow anyone to get away with such gross actions with our top secrets. It is vital to our national security that we establish that that is not acceptable no matter who you are.
     
    Correct. But if he pleaded guilty, of course it would be reported that he "admitted guilt under the espionage act." So the DOJ, in what will be lengthy and fruitless negotiations, will offer to let him plead to something else. It's a very common prosecution tactic and I don't blame them for that. I fault their very obvious motives.
    This doesn’t make any sense. So the DOJ shouldn’t charge him under the act because of the name of the act? They charged him under the Espionage Act because they have credible evidence that he violated the Espionage Act. That’s it. They didn’t name the law.
     
    You are much to clever to be understood, sir!

    Give my regards to @J-DONK , who swore to send an avenging sock puppet to troll me.

    I wait in suspense for said sock puppet to appear.
    You should probably quit accusing people of violating the TOS. Take it up with a moderator by reporting it if you suspect something.
     
    The article you linked said exactly what Cuddle said. In other words, it said that it was due to concern for the environment.
    I saw "climate" not "environment." Two very different things as far as putting America first, which is the subject.
    Later Biden passes an energy bill that would be much better for Americans. The pipeline wasn’t going to make America energy independent. It was Canadian crude, not American crude. Besides, America was a net fossil fuel exported before Trump. Also, it wasn’t Americans that were going to benefit. It was the fossil fuel companies.
    Irrelevant to the subject is your opinion that whether what Biden later did was better for America. Putting America first is about motivation, and putting America first is no Biden's motivation. He makes the desire to make America great again an insult.

    He's a globalist, or is controlled by globalists, who are very much opposed to American success. That's why he made the absurd implied claim that cancelling an American pipeline reduced global warming, but encouraging a Russian pipeline is fine.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom