Trump Tracker Too (2 Trump 2 Tracker) (4 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    EmBeeFiveOhFour

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 1, 2019
    Messages
    636
    Reaction score
    1,952
    Location
    Near a River's Bend
    Offline
    The football board had the very useful Daily Trump Tracker thread, which was a good place to briefly discuss the latest ridiculous thing that might have ended 97% of prior Presidential administrations even if it didn't necessarily justify an entire thread devoted to it in 2017-2019 (because of the sheer volume of these things). Since I don't see anything like that here already, I'll add one myself.
     
    136719388_3608341359259866_2397577185343727542_o.jpg
     
    Last edited:
    Trumps twitter obituary
    ===================
    WASHINGTON (AP) — @realDonaldTrump, the Twitter feed that grew from the random musings of a reality TV star into the cudgel of an American president, has died. It was not quite 12 years old.

    The provocative handle was given birth by a New York real estate tycoon who used it to help him become the 45th U.S. president.

    It began with a May 4, 2009, tweet promoting Donald Trump’s upcoming appearance on David Letterman’s show.

    It died more than 57,000 tweets later, with Trump using some of his final postings on the powerful platform to commiserate with a pro-Trump mob that besieged the halls of Congress in a deadly assault as lawmakers were set to certify his defeat.

    The account met its demise when Twitter announced Friday it was pulling the plug permanently on @realDonaldTrump, citing concern that Trump would use it for “further incitement of violence.”

    Trump retorted that he’d be “building out our own platform in the near future. We will not be SILENCED!”.........

     
    i'll just put this here

    The EPA's new rule, which will be formally published tomorrow, is an attempt to set additional standards for the evidence it considers when establishing new regulations for pollutants. In principle, the rule sounds great: it wants the data behind the scientific papers it uses to be made publicly available before it can be used to support regulatory decisions. In reality, the rule is problematic, because many of these studies rely on patient records that need to be kept confidential. In other cases, the organizations with the best information on some environmental hazards are the companies that produce or work with them, and they may not be interested in sharing proprietary data.

    The practical result of this sort of change is that the EPA would be precluded from relying on scientific papers that contained the clearest indications of public harm. This would almost certainly lead to weaker rules or a decision not to regulate at all.
     
    Just now on CNN: Sources say Trump is regretting committing to a peaceful transfer of power.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom