- Banned
- #1
TheRealTruth
Well-known member
Offline
I ask because it's so long ago. Because people change, is there a point that things said in the past should no longer apply?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't worry, it is bad optics for Biden, it will be taken down or fact checked, either way, you guys are good.
I ask because it's so long ago. Because people change, is there a point that things said in the past should no longer apply?
Don't worry, it is bad optics for Biden, it will be taken down or fact checked, either way, you guys are good.
But yes, it is relevant during a presidential campaign. If high school year books are fair game for a justice then old lies of a presidential candidate are legit also.
Rs digging 35 years back on opponent is revealing.
Even worse for them, Ds only have to post yesterday's POTUS tweets (or video of press conference) to expose lies.
Brett Kavanaugh approves this message.Rs digging 35 years back on opponent is revealing.
What is the cut off limit? I mean people are still crying about Trump stuff from the 70s and 80s. So it it the 90s? 2000s? Also let's be fair you only have to go back 2 days to find stuff on Biden.
Brett Kavanaugh approves this message.
I ask because it's so long ago. Because people change, is there a point that things said in the past should no longer apply?
Sure it matters. Now let's apply the same standards to Trump's lies and disinformation that occur on a daily basis and not 35 years ago.
Yeah pulling up interviews that old doesn’t really serve a purpose. I would hope people’s opinions would evolve.
Now major events like the Crime Bill and the Central Park 5 are still fair game and should be discussed.