- Banned
- #1
TheRealTruth
Well-known member
Offline
I am starting to hear it being floated by some that there should not be any debates for this presidential election?
Is there a precedent for this?
Is there a precedent for this?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Facts don’t have bias.Should facts have a bias?
Factcheck.org has a well-earned reputation for being non-partisan and their fact checks are widely considered accurate. There actually isn't a need for more than one. However, your statement inferred that you don't believe their reputation and therefore don't trust their info. I deduced that you must feel that they have a left bias because their facts don't align with your beliefs.I don't find many fact checking site reputable. The fact we have to have two fact checking sites in play for a debate and the question if there is not a 'right leaning' fact checking site, to me, demonstrates the fact checking sites are not really fact checking sites but political sites and probably should not be labeled 'fact checking' at all.
Only interested if both are forced to speak solely about policy deliverables in specifics... and with timelines....
Not interested in another reality TV finger pointing shirt show...
Oh, there will be debates and there will definitely be a fool on the stage. It will be fun to watch him when he gets blistered with facts. Then again, he does perform a rather impressive jedi mind trick to keep his followers in line.The fools of the DNC know biden is the biggest fool of the bunch. So there is no way they want to have debates.
I'm interested in a train wreck sort of way.
You've got a word salad machine that has never enjoyed getting into specifics, and someone who is well known for making some extraordinary gaffes.
Well, sure, but we already see a load of that guy. What about Joe Biden?I'm interested in a train wreck sort of way.
You've got a word salad machine that has never enjoyed getting into specifics, and someone who is well known for making some extraordinary gaffes.
He is where he has been through this whole process, in his basement, safe from questions.Well, sure, but we already see a load of that guy. What about Joe Biden?
I don't know about that. With how Trump stalked Clinton around the stage in 2016 to intimidate her, can he really control himself enough to stay away from Biden?Yes, they should debate. I don't see a health reason why they shouldn't. Maybe there won't be a crowd. Moderators are a mile away anyway. The two debaters can keep 20 feet apart.
You just probably can't do a town hall.
He is where he has been through this whole process, in his basement, safe from questions.
The fools of the DNC know biden is the biggest fool of the bunch. So there is no way they want to have debates.
Honestly, after Clinton and Trump, how can the presidency be further diminished? Satanic ritual in the oval office? There's already been sex (Clinton) and lies, gaffes and theatrics (Trump).I have no desire to see Trump and Biden potentially further diminish the office with lies, gaffes or theatrics.