SCOTUS rules 6-3 that Title VII of Civil Rights Act applies to sexual orientation (1 Viewer)

< Previous | Next >

GrandAdmiral

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
1,361
Location
Center of the Universe
Offline
This is a big decision. Only about 20 or so states allow such protections. This now provides protections nationwide. Long time coming for many in the LGBTQ community. 6-3 decision is pretty decisive.

 

superchuck500

U.S. Blues
Joined
Mar 26, 2019
Messages
1,955
Reaction score
4,376
Location
Charleston, SC
Offline
It's the biggest decision in the history of civil rights based on sexual orientation/identity. It's bigger than the gay marriage ruling IMO.

I know this is a huge victory and relief for those who have been advocating it for decades. I bet some tears are being shed right now.
 

coldseat

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
741
Reaction score
1,264
Age
45
Location
San Antonio
Offline
This is an unexpected and welcomed decision by this court. I can't believe it took this long to recognize that in law, but better late than never.

I'm grateful I now have those legal protections even though I live in Texas.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #8
OP
GrandAdmiral

GrandAdmiral

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 20, 2019
Messages
1,229
Reaction score
1,361
Location
Center of the Universe
Offline
This is an unexpected and welcomed decision by this court. I can't believe it took this long to recognize that in law, but better late than never.

I'm grateful I now have those legal protections even though I live in Texas.
It really was considering most of the lower courts ruled that it didn't apply to orientation.
 

insidejob

white house klansman goes into hiding
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
1,593
Age
85
Location
Back in 70124
Offline
This is huge. And I like seeing Gorsutch and Roberts writing the dissent majority opinion too.
 
Last edited:

Optimus Prime

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2019
Messages
877
Reaction score
1,331
Age
44
Location
Washington DC Metro
Offline
What was the reasoning behind the dissent?

“Businesses should be allowed to discriminate against gay and transgendered people because.......”
 

EmBeeFiveOhFour

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
501
Reaction score
1,447
Location
Near a River's Bend
Offline
What was the reasoning behind the dissent?

“Businesses should be allowed to discriminate against gay and transgendered people because.......”
Because Congress in 1964 didn't pass the law intending to prevent discrimination of gay and transgendered people. And no attempts to expand the law to apply to sexual orientation in Congress have been successful.

But the words of the law (prohibiting discrimination "because of sex") are what they are. And the guys dissenting are of course the ones who claim to care the most about "textualism."
 

coldseat

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
741
Reaction score
1,264
Age
45
Location
San Antonio
Offline
Gorsuch is an interesting character. He's very conservative, but he seems to interpert his consevatisim differently than the other conservatives on the court. Espicially when it comes to minority rights and the environnment.
 

NoPartyMike

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 30, 2019
Messages
103
Reaction score
108
Location
AmericanDreamLand
Offline
Will this have an impact in regard to transgenders in the military?

Also, will this have an effect on the recent health care protection rollbacks, based on a providers ethical stance?
 

MT15

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2019
Messages
3,133
Reaction score
4,935
Location
Midwest
Offline
This is a welcome decision, but not unexpected according to some lawyers I read on Twitter.

Does this invalidate or render unconstitutional the recent EO by Trump about declining medical services?
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

< Previous | Next >

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Advertisement

Fact Checkers News Feed

General News Feed

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Top Bottom