Kremlin papers appear to show Putin’s plot to put Trump in White House (1 Viewer)

[Booker]

Not really that shocking to anyone paying attention the last five years. The only question was whether Russia was working with the campaign, which the Mueller investigation was unable to confirm, but it was obvious Russia was working in Trump's interest.

And no doubt Putin feels he got his money's worth, just for January 6 alone. The elevation of Donald Trump was one of the worst things that ever happened to this country.

The report – “No 32-04 \ vd” – is classified as secret. It says Trump is the “most promising candidate” from the Kremlin’s point of view. The word in Russian is perspektivny.

There is a brief psychological assessment of Trump, who is described as an “impulsive, mentally unstable and unbalanced individual who suffers from an inferiority complex”.

There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected – the document says – from Trump’s earlier “non-official visits to Russian Federation territory”.

“It is acutely necessary to use all possible force to facilitate his [Trump’s] election to the post of US president,” the paper says.

This would help bring about Russia’s favoured “theoretical political scenario”. A Trump win “will definitely lead to the destabilisation of the US’s sociopolitical system” and see hidden discontent burst into the open, it predicts.

Kremlin papers appear to show Putin’s plot to put Trump in White House

Exclusive: Documents suggest Russia launched secret multi-agency effort to interfere in US democracy

www.theguardian.com

 

[Paul]

Yea, no.

this is not an example of systemic racism, and i believe that you are trying to muddy the waters hoping to get a liberal to say something is systemic racism that clearly is not.

You are trying to build a meta straw man.

The police assumes whites will be less violent than POC and you do not think that is systemic racism? OOOOOOOOOOOOK!!!!! The police force is an institution not a person.

 

[samiam5211]

The police assumes whites will be less violent than POC and you do not think that is systemic racism? OOOOOOOOOOOOK!!!!! The police force is an institution not a person.

That's not what happened on Jan 6. You aren't that stupid, so i assume you are being disingenuous.

 

[V Chip]

IN an ideal world skin color should not be an issue. It would be treated no differently than height, weight, or any other mundane physical trait of humans. This may not be realistic today, but we have to start somewhere.

That answered none of the questions.

 

[Saint by the Bay]

The capital police assumed right-wingers would be less violent than left-wingers. Race wasn't a part of the equation.

 

[MT15]

This is a fascinating thread about the way FB is hurting the US by it’s refusal to kick off known bad actors from foreign nations whose sole purpose is to fragment the US. Zuck is a true villain.

 

[MT15]

And there’s this now. But the whole Russia angle was a hoax, right?

‘Two veteran Republican campaign operatives — including one who got a pardon from then-President Donald Trump one month before he left office — are charged in a new federal indictment with funneling $25,000 from a Russian national into the Trump campaign in 2016.

Jesse Benton, 43, and Doug Wead, 75, made brief appearances Monday at a video hearing in U.S. District Court in Washington, pleading not guilty to six felony charges including facilitating a campaign contribution by a foreign national, acting as a straw donor and causing the filing of false campaign finance reports.’

Longtime GOP operatives charged with funneling Russian national’s money to Trump, RNC

Jesse Benton and Doug Wead pleaded not guilty to six felony charges, including facilitating a campaign contribution by a foreign national.

www.politico.com

 

[Paul]

And there’s this now. But the whole Russia angle was a hoax, right?

‘Two veteran Republican campaign operatives — including one who got a pardon from then-President Donald Trump one month before he left office — are charged in a new federal indictment with funneling $25,000 from a Russian national into the Trump campaign in 2016.

Jesse Benton, 43, and Doug Wead, 75, made brief appearances Monday at a video hearing in U.S. District Court in Washington, pleading not guilty to six felony charges including facilitating a campaign contribution by a foreign national, acting as a straw donor and causing the filing of false campaign finance reports.’

Longtime GOP operatives charged with funneling Russian national’s money to Trump, RNC

Jesse Benton and Doug Wead pleaded not guilty to six felony charges, including facilitating a campaign contribution by a foreign national.

www.politico.com

Guys: Trump is gone!

 

[insidejob]

Guys: Trump is gone!

Guy: He's still a criminal who deserves to face the same justice system as the rest of us!

 

[SFIDC3]

Guy: He's still a criminal who deserves to face the same justice system as the rest of us!

Add to the fact that he will likely run for president again (unless he dies or is jailed first which I'm hoping for) and when he loses by a landslide and claims the election was stolen it is very likely violence from the right wing luny toons will follow....

 

[SaintForLife]

 

[MT15]

You sure this indictment is one to crow about, SFL?

 

[SaintForLife]

You sure this indictment is one to crow about, SFL?

Wait, so you are using the reporter who pushed the Russian bounties BS, that the drone strike in Afghanistan that killed innocent people actually targeted ISIS, and was one of the biggest purveyors of the Russiagate bombshells that fizzled out after closer examination to try to discredit Durham? That article you linked to didn't show much other than the excuses from the indicted. Can you find another source besides this CIA stenographer?

I wonder why longtime Clinton/DNC lawyer Marc Elias left Perkins Coie right at the time of the indictment of Sussman who was also working for Clinton? I'm just speculating, but was Perkins Coie working with Durham so they got rid of Elias to avoid being liable for any potential crimes committed by Sussman or Elias?

More speculation, but I wonder if the reason why its taken Durham so long is because he had to fight to get records from Perkins Coie in court? I doubt Perkins Coie's clients like Hillary/DNC agreed to waive the attorney/client privileges and just voluntarily hand over documents. We know that Durham does have documents from Perkins Coie like Sussman's billing records.

For the people who have claimed that Durham has nothing and this one indictment is nothing, why did Durham issue new subpoenas to Perkins Coie after the Sussman indictment?

 

[Goatman saint]

Who do we even believe anymore? Our political structure has become nothing more than a game of thrones for corporate entities. Does the public even matter anymore? Doubtful. Does the health and welfare of the people make any difference? No. Just a bunch of lying and manipulative game playing buy the elites to further enrich themselves and consolidate power and influence.

 

[SaintForLife]

 

[SaintForLife]

Who do we even believe anymore? Our political structure has become nothing more than a game of thrones for corporate entities. Does the public even matter anymore? Doubtful. Does the health and welfare of the people make any difference? No. Just a bunch of lying and manipulative game playing buy the elites to further enrich themselves and consolidate power and influence.

Excellent post!

 

[SaintForLife]

Interesting that some more connections are being revealed.






But it was not until nearly four years later that the public learned that CrowdStrike was not as confident about the Russian hacking allegation that it had publicly lodged. In December 2017 testimony that was declassified only in May 2020, Henry admitted that his firm was akin to a bank examiner who believes the vault has been robbed – but has no proof of how. CrowdStrike, Henry disclosed, "did not have concrete evidence" that alleged Russian hackers removed any data from the DNC servers.

"There's circumstantial evidence, but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated," Henry told the House Intelligence Committee. "There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."

Read in retrospect, public statements from U.S. intelligence officials indicate that they knew of this crucial gap early on, and used qualified language to gloss it over.

 

[SaintForLife]

 

[SaintForLife]