Harris and Walz first joint interview Thursday, Aug. 29 (1 Viewer)

[zztop]

Thursday, Aug. 29th at 9 p.m. ET on CNN

 

[Optimus Prime]

Meanwhile on tiger
(I read through their topic, which I regret - they didn't like the interview to say the least)

We appreciate you taking one for the team. Truly doing the Lord's work

What are they saying over there? What talking points will soon be sandblasted all over this thread?

 

[zztop]

We appreciate you taking one for the team. Truly doing the Lord's work

What are they saying over there? What talking points will soon be sandblasted all over this thread?

I've depleted my tiger reserves, so I don't want to revisit there for a while lol
but going off memory (and the comments I can post here)

- KH seemed unauthentic
- 'tampon tim' looked like a creepy uncle/handler who was uncomfortable to be there
- CNN is propoganda
- KH did not seem presidential enough
- "trainwreck"
- One person made an odd comment of not believing KH did not think of herself first when Biden called her about dropping out.
- I think someone else said something like "how can you trust this person when they change their position on things they said previously" (if I had to guess, this was about KH's comment to not ban fracking)

 

[coldseat]

I've depleted my tiger reserves, so I don't want to revisit there for a while lol
but going off memory (and the comments I can post here)

- KH seemed unauthentic
- 'tampon tim' looked like a creepy uncle/handler who was uncomfortable to be there
- CNN is propoganda
- KH did not seem presidential enough
- "trainwreck"
- One person made an odd comment of not believing KH did not think of herself first when Biden called her about dropping out.
- I think someone else said something like "how can you trust this person when they change their position on things they said previously" (if I had to guess, this was about KH's comment to not ban fracking)

Sounds like standard boiler plate crap Maga was going to say regardless of how the interview went. Which basically means they have nothing.

 

[Nebaghead]

Sounds like standard boiler plate crap Maga was going to say regardless of how the interview went. Which basically means they have nothing.

I like the how you can trust someone who changes their position, like someone now supporting free IVF and repealing the abortion ban in Florida.

 

[zztop]

I like the how you can trust someone who changes their position, like someone now supporting free IVF and repealing the abortion ban in Florida.

yeah, I found that an ironic comment. Maybe it is because of that motto "republicans: it's only okay when we do it"

 

[DJ1BigTymer]

...
- I think someone else said something like "how can you trust this person when they change their position on things they said previously" (if I had to guess, this was about KH's comment to not ban fracking)

You know how she can avoid this? Stop answering YES to questions that catches you off guard!

DB - Will you appoint a Republican to your Cabinet?
KH - YES. I would.

SLOW DOWN! What she should have said:

- I would consider doing so...I got — we got 68 days to go with this election, so I’m not puttin’ the cart before the horse. But I would. I think — I think it’s really important. I — I have spent my career inviting diversity of opinion. I think it’s important to have people at the table when some of the most important decisions are being made that have different views, different experiences. And I think it would be to the benefit of the American public to have a member of my Cabinet who is a Republican.

 

[Dragon]

Maybe she was just being honest. Maybe she already have a candidate in mind

 

[GrandAdmiral]

Maybe she was just being honest. Maybe she already have a candidate in mind

Also of note, she said she would, not will.

 

[Lapaz]

yeah, I found that an ironic comment. Maybe it is because of that motto "republicans: it's only okay when we do it"

Walz has said some minor lies like carrying a weapon in war, something about a DUI, but most people have embellished things like that, and I think he'll look honest in comparison to Trump. With that said, I think he said it once, and I have heard a couple of veterans say that he did carry weapons in war, just not in combat. Nevertheless, none of us are perfect, but let's let the Washington Post track their lies. It's all a continuum, and I think Trump will be on the extreme lying end, and Walz will be closer to the honest end of the continuum.

Regarding the interview, I don't think Harris did a good job of explaining her support of fracking, whether she would change anything regarding Gaza, and immigration policy. I think she needs to have more clear answers for the debate.

 

[zztop]

Meanwhile


(I like this reply)

 

[MT15]

Elise is a clown show.

 

[zztop]

Another take

Megyn Kelly Complains Kamala Harris Used Her VP as a ‘Big White Blankie’ in CNN Interview | Video

Megyn Kelly didn't hold back her thoughts on Kamala Harris bringing Tim Walz to her first sit-down interview as the Democratic nominee.

www.thewrap.com

“She did show up with her blankie, her emotional support governor. He did – if it’s possible – more poorly than she did.”

 

[MT15]

Man, we don’t need to hear Kelly’s take on, well, anything. lol.