Government Efficiency (3 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

RobF

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2019
Messages
1,356
Reaction score
4,156
Location
Warrington, UK
Offline
I think this topic deserves its own thread, both to discuss generally the topic of government efficiency, and specifically the so-called 'Department of Government Efficiency' and the incoming Trump administration's aims to "dismantle Government Bureaucracy, slash excess regulations, cut wasteful expenditures and restructure Federal Agencies".

The announcements have been covered in the The Trump Cabinet and key post thread, but to recap, Trump has announced that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy will work together on a not-actually-an-official-government-Department of Government Efficiency, which is intended to work with the White House and Office of Management & Budget to "drive large scale structural reform, and create an entrepreneurial approach to Government never seen before," with the 'Department' to conclude its work "no later than July 4, 2026."

Musk has previously said that the federal budget could be reduced by "at least $2 trillion", and Ramaswarmy, during his presidential campaign, said he would fire more than 75% of the federal work force and disband agencies including the Department of Education and the FBI.
 
So what if Trump/Musk says "no, we're not going to do that." The only way to hold him accountable would be through impeachment, and we know that's not going to happen.
There's no "what if" there...it's WHEN they ignore the ruling!
 
I don't think it's that simple but we'll have to see.
Sure, but that's the simplified, cut-to-the-chase version. If/when the adminstation resists orders to undo what they've done, then what -- contempt? How would that be enforced?

And for arguments sake let's assume that there are appeals and things bounce back and forth through the courts for awhile. I would expect every nuance to be challenged, maybe even venue/jurisdiction, anything to gum things up (and also assume that while this drags out the administration will continue to resist reinstating eliminated people/positions/programs/etc.).

But if this were to eventually get to the Supreme Court, and even they were to rule against him, but he still says, "no, you can't make me" -- then what? The threat of impeachment would be the normal guardrail to hold a normal president accountable, but Trump is quite obviously abnormal.
 
Sure, but that's the simplified, cut-to-the-chase version. If/when the adminstation resists orders to undo what they've done, then what -- contempt? How would that be enforced?

And for arguments sake let's assume that there are appeals and things bounce back and forth through the courts for awhile. I would expect every nuance to be challenged, maybe even venue/jurisdiction, anything to gum things up (and also assume that while this drags out the administration will continue to resist reinstating eliminated people/positions/programs/etc.).

But if this were to eventually get to the Supreme Court, and even they were to rule against him, but he still says, "no, you can't make me" -- then what? The threat of impeachment would be the normal guardrail to hold a normal president accountable, but Trump is quite obviously abnormal.

Yes, for Trump that's really the only recourse. For the Trump administration and all that work for it, there's more on the table. The judiciary has ways to take punitive action and has the power in its rules to appoint persons other than US Marshals to execute court orders that have the effect of law.

Yes, of course the President and the executive branch could simply refuse and the Constitution is basically over at that point . . . smoke 'em if you got 'em. But this system tends to be resilient, I think it's best to let it play out over getting spun out in possibilities, even if they seem exceedingly likely.
 
Yes, for Trump that's really the only recourse. For the Trump administration and all that work for it, there's more on the table. The judiciary has ways to take punitive action and has the power in its rules to appoint persons other than US Marshals to execute court orders that have the effect of law.

Yes, of course the President and the executive branch could simply refuse and the Constitution is basically over at that point . . . smoke 'em if you got 'em. But this system tends to be resilient, I think it's best to let it play out over getting spun out in possibilities, even if they seem exceedingly likely.
I hear you, it just feels like we're watching the inevitable play out in slow motion. Congress won't/can't impeach and convict Trump, and I would expect he can and will pardon anyone working in his administration from punitive judiciary action.

At least I live in Colorado, so if/when the times comes to "smoke 'em if you got 'em" there will at least be good shirt to smoke.
 
WASHINGTON (AP) — Top Democrats on the House Judiciary and House Oversight committees have filed a lengthy Freedom of Information Act request questioning whether the Trump administration’s DOGE Service is operating “outside the bounds of federal law,” The Associated Press has learned.

Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland and Rep. Gerald Connolly of Virginia are seeking detailed information about the authority of the Department of Government Efficiency Service, including billionaire Trump adviser Elon Musk and some 40 other people, to carry out firings of federal workers and dismantling of federal agencies.

They also are requesting detailed information about DOGE’s access to sensitive data, its use of artificial intelligence, the resumes and training of its staff and its communications related to Musk-held entities including SpaceX, Starlink and Tesla.

“The Administration and Mr. Musk have hidden behind a veil of secrecy as they systematically dismantle the federal government of the United States,” the Democrats wrote in a letter to DOGE administrator Amy Gleason accompanying the FOIA request, which was obtained by the AP. “The American people deserve answers, and we are committed to using every tool at our disposal to expose the truth about DOGE’s operations.”…….



 
So, my brother's agency is on the list that Trump wants to shut down, he's been there for nearly 20 years

When I talked with him he was as down and dejected as I've ever heard him

My girlfriend (who's own job is in limbo) is taking all this daily chaos, cruelty and uncertainty very hard and damn near had a panic attack (not an exaggeration) the other night over it all

Voight said that he wanted federal employees to feel trauma and distress every day

Well, mission accomplished butt crevasse

Fork him, fork Trump, fork Musk and everyone who voted for this
 
Last edited:
Several federally-operated campgrounds at one of Pennsylvania’s most popular summer destinations will be closed indefinitely due to “executive-order driven staffing shortages.”

Raystown Lake, in Huntingdon County, is the largest lake entirely within Pennsylvania. The 8,300-acre lake is managed by the U.S. Army Corps Engineers and, according to a news release from the agency’s Baltimore office, staffing shortages will require staff to focus on “dam operations for flood protection and emergency response readiness” ahead of the 2025 season.

According to the Army Corps, the lakes Seven Points, Susquehannock, and Nancy’s Boat-to-Shore Campgrounds will all be closed until further notice. All told, more than 300 campsites will be closed as a result of the announcement, including boat-in only sites.

Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has targeted cutbacks at a slew of government agencies, including the Army Corps.

In addition, further north in Tioga County, Tompkins Campground on Tioga-Hammond and Cowanesque Lakes will also close, along with its swim beach and boat ramp. Tompkins has approximately 125 sites.

Avid campers know that lakefront campsites are difficult to obtain in the summer, in Pennsylvania and beyond, and many are reserved well in advance of the season. According to the Army Corps, refunds would be provided to campers who made reservations through Recreation.gov.

In Northwestern Pennsylvania, the U.S. Forest Service operates approximately 1,000 campsites on the Allegheny Reservoir, though there’s been no news of closures. A spokesperson for the agency could not immediately be reached for comment Tuesday...............

 
So, my brother's agency is on the list that Trump wants to shut down, he's been there for nearly 20 years

When I talked with him he was as down and dejected as I've ever heard him

My girlfriend (who's own job is in limbo) is taking all this daily chaos, cruelty and uncertainty very hard and damn near had a panic attack (not an exaggeration) the other night over it all

Voight said that he wanted federal employees to feel trauma and distress every day

Well, mission accomplished butt crevasse

Fork him, fork Trump, fork Musk and everyone who voted for this
I hear you. My wife’s position is in jeopardy also….the absolute destruction that this is doing across America is hideous and evil. Better days can’t get here soon enough.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Back
Top Bottom