Federal Law Enforcement Use Unmarked Vehicles To Grab Protesters Off Portland Streets (UPDATE: Trump admin. deploying federal LE to cities) (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Dragon

    Well-known member
    Staff member
    Joined
    Sep 28, 2019
    Messages
    1,461
    Reaction score
    2,676
    Age
    61
    Location
    Elsinore,Denmark
    Offline
    “All United States Marshals Service arrestees have public records of arrest documenting their charges. Our agency did not arrest or detain Mark James Pettibone.”

    OPB sent DHS an extensive list of questions about Pettibone’s arrest including: What is the legal justification for making arrests away from federal property? What is the legal justification for searching people who are not participating in criminal activity? Why are federal officers using civilian vehicles and taking people away in them? Are the arrests federal officers make legal under the constitution? If so, how?

    After 7 p.m. Thursday, a DHS spokesperson responded, on background, that they could confirm Wolf was in Portland during the day. The spokesperson didn’t acknowledge the remaining questions.








    This story is very troublesome.
     
    The Proud Boys are not a joke. People don’t join because they like McInnis’s humor. That’s a brutally inaccurate generalization by Maté. But not surprising coming from him.

    They aren’t new, either. They have been around since Trump’s first year. So to act like it’s new is nonsense and discussion on the group’s racism happened back on political forums prior to this site being formed.

    your tweets are incorrect on all kinds of ways.

    as for numbers, hundreds showed up in a single city recently. Thousands gathered in and around Charlottesville.

    and they had a major social media presence until they lost some of that platform for racism and Islamaphobia and misogyny. But they are still widely, easily found because their followere post all over social media.
    Yeah, the membership numbers posted are based on the small percentage who are naive enough to formally associate their name to the group. The smarter, and probably more dangerous, participants in the Proud Boy's activities know that they're much better off if they participate in anonymity instead of outing themselves by formally signing up as members.
     
    The Proud Boys are not a joke. People don’t join because they like McInnis’s humor. That’s a brutally inaccurate generalization by Maté. But not surprising coming from him.

    They aren’t new, either. They have been around since Trump’s first year. So to act like it’s new is nonsense and discussion on the group’s racism happened back on political forums prior to this site being formed.

    your tweets are incorrect on all kinds of ways.

    as for numbers, hundreds showed up in a single city recently. Thousands gathered in and around Charlottesville.

    and they had a major social media presence until they lost some of that platform for racism and Islamaphobia and misogyny. But they are still widely, easily found because their followere post all over social media.
    Do you know their actual numbers? They seem to be a small group despite the media purposely inflating their reach and influence while they try to ignore the left wingers commiting violence.

    You don't think their numbers even come close to the violent left wing rioters that are destroying businesses and properties correct?

    Proud Boys rally in Portland draws only about 200 after city braced for thousands

     
    Yeah, the membership numbers posted are based on the small percentage who are naive enough to formally associate their name to the group. The smarter, and probably more dangerous, participants in the Proud Boy's activities know that they're much better off if they participate in anonymity instead of outing themselves by formally signing up as members.
    Are they just an idea and not an organization like Biden claimed about Antifa at the debate?
     
    Are they just an idea and not an organization like Biden claimed about Antifa at the debate?
    No, they are not just an idea. They are a highly organized, branded group with a centralized structure of power and communication network spread out across several social communications platforms.

    The numbers of people participating in their social communications network, as well as in in their self recorded activities across the nation, are proof that their numbers are in the thousands and not hundreds.

    Those who are anti-fascists (so called "Antifa") don't have an organized, branded group with a centralized structure of power nor do they have a communication network. The only people branding people as "Antifa" are people who don't identify with being anti-fascists.
     
    Last edited:
    Do you know their actual numbers? They seem to be a small group despite the media purposely inflating their reach and influence while they try to ignore the left wingers commiting violence.

    You don't think their numbers even come close to the violent left wing rioters that are destroying businesses and properties correct?

    Proud Boys rally in Portland draws only about 200 after city braced for thousands


    How many does it take to turn a march into a riot?
    Twenty, maybe thirty?
    If they can get 200 to show up in broad daylight in a city that's about as ideologically hostile as possible, there's thousands across the nation.
     
    It took only two men to blow up the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma. Any domestic terrorist organization is worth investigating and monitoring.
    I never claimed it wasn't worth monitoring and investigating. What I said was the national media and Democrats have acted like Proud Boys are larger than they really are while they act like the left wing rioters and anarchists are smaller and less of a concern.
     
    What I said was the national media and Democrats have acted like Proud Boys are larger than they really are while they act like the left wing rioters and anarchists are smaller and less of a concern.
    You have said that, but objective facts show that what you said is questionable at best and most likely not true.
     
    No, they are not just an idea. They are a highly organized, branded group with a centralized structure of power and communication network spread out across several social communications platforms.

    The numbers of people participating in their social communications network, as well as in in their self recorded activities across the nation, are proof that their numbers are in the thousands and not hundreds.

    Those who are anti-fascists (so called "Antifa") don't have an organized, branded group with a centralized structure of power nor do they have a communication network. The only people branding people as "Antifa" are people who don't identify with being anti-fascists.
    For a group that's supposedly not organized Antifa has committed a lot of violence and have damaged a lot of property. Proud Boy seem like they are more about physically fighting Antifa than destroying property.
     
    Oh, like the FBI who said white supremacist are the biggest domestic terrorist threat. Not ANTIFA.
    Nobody believes the Proud Boys are a bigger threat than the left wingers rioting and damaging property. Are all white supremacists Proud Boys?
     
    I'll respond in two parts:
    For a group that's supposedly not organized Antifa has committed a lot of violence and have damaged a lot of property. For a group that's supposedly not organized Antifa has committed a lot of violence and have damaged a lot of property.
    The actual truth is that almost all of the people who have committed violence and damaged property have been accused of belonging to a non-existent group called "Antifa."

    Show me objective evidence that proves those people were members of the mythical group "Antifa."

    Show me the objective evidence of someone clearly declaring themselves as belonging to an organization called "Antifa" while committing violence and/or destroying property.

    Anyone can claim something is true. It's only convincing when they demonstrate objective evidence of that claim.

    Proud Boy seem like they are more about physically fighting Antifa than destroying property.
    Which is worse and more dangerous, physical harm or property harm?
     
    Last edited:
    Nobody believes the Proud Boys are a bigger threat than the left wingers rioting and damaging property. Are all white supremacists Proud Boys?
    The mother loving FBI classified them as a domestic terrorist grouping. Show me where they classified the BLM group as that. Riot and looting is bad no matter who does it. The MO of BLM is t rioting, the Proud Boys is to incite violence. Their rule to join is to fight someone for the cause.
     
    Nobody believes the Proud Boys are a bigger threat than the left wingers rioting and damaging property.
    I do.

    Several posters in this thread have clearly stated they do and offered objective evidence to support those beliefs.

    The FBI does.

    Most of the citizens of Portland do.

    National polls have shown that the majority of Americans do.

    Is it your contention that we are all "nobody."

    The Proud Boys don't have to be all white supremacists to be a significant part of the threat of white supremacists.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom