Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would you not expect it? I think it is sad that you didn’t expect justice. I think the justice system does a pretty good job of convicting when the evidence is strong, but the media doesn’t portray it well. He was clearly guilty. The only question was what degree he would get.I did not expect that. I didn't even put it on live to avoid the gut punch of an acquittal. Thanks goodness for some semblance of justice/decency.
Why would you not expect it? I think it is sad that you didn’t expect justice. I think the justice system does a pretty good job of convicting when the evidence is strong, but the media doesn’t portray it well. He was clearly guilty. The only question was what degree he would get.
He was a cop. We treat cops better than we treat veterans in this country. Acquittal was definitely the safe bet, even with the mountain of evidence.
Why would you not expect it? I think it is sad that you didn’t expect justice. I think the justice system does a pretty good job of convicting when the evidence is strong, but the media doesn’t portray it well. He was clearly guilty. The only question was what degree he would get.
i was worried about a hung jury though. Only takes one person to do that.
i was worried about a hung jury though. Only takes one person to do that.
You ever watch the philando Castile video?Nah, it was never a safe bet. This was about as close to an open/shut case as there ever will be. There really was no other verdict unless you have an idiot on the jury deliberately trying to muck things up. I get the history of cops getting friendly judgements often. Buy when there is clear video evidence from start to finish, generally juries will make the right call.
I was 100% sure there was a going to be a guilty verdict. The only question was whether is one of the charges or all of them. I expect this will hold up on any appeals challenge as well.
You ever watch the philando Castile video?
Cue Sesame Street song
====================
Three-quarters of Americans overall said they agree with the guilty jury verdict found for each of the three charges against former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin in the murder of George Floyd. But among Republican voters, about half said the outcome was the "wrong verdict," according to a new survey.
A CBS News/YouGov poll of more than 2,500 U.S. adults released Sunday found that white Americans' reactions to the Chauvin verdict were "largely related to partisanship."
About 9 in 10 Democrats surveyed said Chauvin's conviction on all three counts—second-degree murder, third-degree murder, and second-degree manslaughter—was the "right" decision. The 75 percent of independent voters who agreed it was the right verdict directly corresponded to the overall response from Americans. Eighty-two percent of people who identify as political moderates said they agree the guilty verdict was the right decision.
But among Republican Party voters, 46 percent said it was the "wrong verdict," about five times the amount of disagreeing Democrats............
Nearly Half of Republicans Think Chauvin Trial Verdict Was Wrong: Poll
U.S. adults who disagreed with the verdict were overwhelmingly white, conservative and male.www.newsweek.com
It's an interesting barometer of public opinion but I don't care whether someone is a Democrat or Republican, unless you are familiar with all of the evidence presented and listened to the full charge from the judge on how the jury is to consider the charges, an opinion on whether a verdict is "right" or "wrong" lacks sufficient information to be meaningful.
There is often information about the elements of the criminal charges or restrictions on use of evidence that inform the verdict in a way that a person on the street does not comprehend.
The police department’s original version of what happened with George Floyd. Do you think if there was no video Chauvin ever would have been charged? (rhetorical).
Nah, it was never a safe bet. This was about as close to an open/shut case as there ever will be. There really was no other verdict unless you have an idiot on the jury deliberately trying to muck things up. I get the history of cops getting friendly judgements often. Buy when there is clear video evidence from start to finish, generally juries will make the right call.
I was 100% sure there was a going to be a guilty verdict. The only question was whether is one of the charges or all of them. I expect this will hold up on any appeals challenge as well.
It was never a safe bet but one of the most powerful points that someone made centered around the fact that there were multiple kids/minors witnessing the murder....and a few of those kids/bystanders were brave enough to film it.....to me that is incredibly powerful....this is a 1st step in a long process to holding police accountable....
We definitely don't treat cops better than veterans, and the notion that this case could end in acquittal was a media narrative to keep people engaged. Cops get convicted regularly, especially when the evidence is this strong. A hung jury was a possibility, but acquittal was almost impossible.He was a cop. We treat cops better than we treat veterans in this country. Acquittal was definitely the safe bet, even with the mountain of evidence.