Capitol Riot arrests (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Bigdaddysaints

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Nov 16, 2019
    Messages
    2,737
    Reaction score
    4,005
    Location
    Prairieville, La
    Offline
    Figured we should start a separate thread on the arrests and those involved in the storming of the Capitol. I know it has been talked about in the other thread a lot, but for the ones who just want to follow the ones arrested and/or charged, this will be an easier way to see updates on the investigations.

    Link below is everyone who has been arrested. But we know there will be more.

    The website seems to be updated with new information daily.

    The ones who are getting the most air time:


    Jake Angeli
    1610987626331.png


    Adam Johnson
    1610987698358.png


    Richard Barnett
    1610987768489.png


    Kevin Seefried
    1610987811788.png


    Eric Gavelek Munchel
    1610987942709.png


    Larry R. Brock
    Lisa Eisenhart
    Robert Keith Packer
    Klete Keller
    Aaron Mostofsky
    Anthime Joseph Gionet
    Peter Francis Stager
    Christine Priola
     
    imagine that, RG using fake news, who'd thought it.. lol.. but he says main stream media can't be trusted, but it he saw it on Facebook, that's a trusted source. smh.
    What on EARTH are you drivelling on about ? I seem to recall that my source was Forbes, but the number of 25,000 (or 26,000) was widely promulgated, including on some military PR sites. I have NEVER quoted from Facebook in these fora. And precisely WHAT did I post that is "fake news" ? I may occasionally make mistakes, but I don't deliberately post 'fake news'.

    You, Sir, owe me an apology.
     
    Not to mention the fact that a bunch of loons had planned to kidnap the Governor of Michigan WITH zipties. To completely ignore that piece of context is just, well being intellectually dishonest at worst, at best, just ignorant.

    How is that contextual with the Capitol invasion ? It was a year earlier, in a different state, with different motivations, and the protesters where escorted into the state building by police ?
     
    And is it a proportional response to build walls around the capitol, and man them with 26,000 national guard troops ?

    What on EARTH are you drivelling on about ? I seem to recall that my source was Forbes, but the number of 25,000 (or 26,000) was widely promulgated, including on some military PR sites. I have NEVER quoted from Facebook in these fora. And precisely WHAT did I post that is "fake news" ? I may occasionally make mistakes, but I don't deliberately post 'fake news'.

    You, Sir, owe me an apology.
    none of the top quote ia true. they are not building walls around the Capitol and manning them with 26k troops.
    were you saying that AFTER the insurrection attempt, they should not have put up fences and had troops guarding the Capitol since there were talks of other attempts by the Qcrazies up to the inauguration? do you think they should have had zero extra protection because of what happened on Jan 6th? you were against all the extra security?
    you seem to think that there are walls and 26k troops there right now, which is in fact not true.
     
    How is that contextual with the Capitol invasion ? It was a year earlier, in a different state, with different motivations, and the protesters where escorted into the state building by police ?

    You have way of framing your posts in the form of rhetorical questions rather than genuine questions. The posts come off as genuine questions when they're really statements feigning ignorance when I think it's really willful ignorance. I don't post much anymore, but I'm damn sure not wasting gray matter responding to willful ignorance. I'm not convinced you're asking this "question" in good faith, so maybe somebody else can play your game.
     
    none of the top quote ia true. they are not building walls around the Capitol and manning them with 26k troops.
    were you saying that AFTER the insurrection attempt, they should not have put up fences and had troops guarding the Capitol since there were talks of other attempts by the Qcrazies up to the inauguration? do you think they should have had zero extra protection because of what happened on Jan 6th? you were against all the extra security?
    you seem to think that there are walls and 26k troops there right now, which is in fact not true.
    All of my top quote was true. They build wire walls around the capital building, and there where 26,000 national guard there. Which part was false ?
     
    Except for the protester they shot dead ?

    Only after she was waned repeatedly that she'd be shot if she and the group she was in breached the barrier. That area was sealed off to protect the members of Congress and staffers who were holed up there. I watched the video from more than one angle. The agent who shot her was likely told to defend that barrier with deadly force if breached.

    Is it sad she died? Sure. Is it her fault? Yes.
     
    Who cares if she was warned. She was a breaking and entering perp, that was aggressively crossing over a barricade inside the Capitol. The law gives the right to use deadly force in that situation

    I only regret she wasn’t shot in the stomach so she would have suffered before she died.
     
    REally ? She was warned ? I didn't know that. Do you have corroboration of that ?

    listen closely to the video.

    Thats all the corroboration you will need.

    Fact remains, she lost her life because of a false premise, co-opted by the POTUS at the time. What should be of great sadness to you is she indeed lost her life because she believed in something/someone who simply wasnt true/truthful.
     
    listen closely to the video.

    Thats all the corroboration you will need.

    Fact remains, she lost her life because of a false premise, co-opted by the POTUS at the time. What should be of great sadness to you is she indeed lost her life because she believed in something/someone who simply wasnt true/truthful.

    Translation: Some are only interested in questioning appropriate police procedures and responses because of agendas and the people who are being policed.
     
    Translation: Some are only interested in questioning appropriate police procedures and responses because of agendas and the people who are being policed.

    uh huh.

    sure thang.

    gotcha.

    you continue to believe what you wish to believe. Fact remains, a young woman is dead, not for a cause...for an ideology that had her break into the Capitol of the US, and continue on her rampage to where high-level government officials were being protected.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom