zztop
Well-known member
Offline
I feel like this deserves a separate topic.
What will be the plan for the DNC?
How will this all shake out?
What will be the plan for the DNC?
How will this all shake out?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with the sentiment about insurance companies, but corporations do contribute to employees' health insurance in a number of ways. Corporations contribute matching funds to the price of health, vision, and life insurance of their employees. They also are able to negotiate better rates for employees, by contracting group insurance. Then even offer some relief after an employee is terminated/laid off/separates from a corporation with C.O.B.R.A.
Is it perfect? No. Equitable/just? Depends who you ask. But personally, I paid $800 a month for the best coverage I could get for my family while I was working, with the company I was working for contributing $600 (IIRC). When I retired, I could've signed up for C.O.B.R.A. for ~$1,500/month. If I were the get the same coverage by myself, it was ~$2,500/month.
And one thing about corporations... I get that people think corporations are made exclusively of Warren Buffets, Bill Gateses, Elon Musks, and CEO's who make millions. But corporations are also people like you or me, thousands of shareholders who own fractions of companies here and there.
That sword cuts both ways, Krod. If a child wants something and you forbid them from having it, then you are also making life altering decisions for the child. You're just forcing them to follow the life path that you think they should follow.1- the fact that adults are making these life altering decisions for kids is the crazy part. All of it should be outlawed until they are at least 18. It’s gross and detrimental
I completely agree with Fetterman and no one told me I'm not getting picked for VP. Fetterman never once expressed any desire to be president or VP and consistently supported Biden being the nominee. He's just being factually accurate when he says this:They obviously told Fetterman he isn't getting picked for VP.
It's pretty easy to work through logically.. they thought defeating Biden was essentially in the bag, they may still think they'll defeat Kamala but now the scene has been shaken up and if the trajectory you felt before was certain victory.. you didn't really want anything to shake that.So I have seen two things happening at the same time on Twitter. Several people, some media, some former Rs like Sarah Longwell, have posted that the Trump campaign is in shambles over this. They’re not sure they want to face Harris, they’re doubting their strategy of trying to get Biden out now.
At the same time random MAGAs in the comments are saying that’s not true - like they would know. And swearing they wanted Biden out because he’s harder to beat than Harris.
Just nice to see the chaos on the other side for a change.
I'm curious to see the reaction of the alleged liberal media, who up to know did a really good job of mocking Biden every chance they got.
I completely agree with Fetterman and no one told me I'm not getting picked for VP. Fetterman never once expressed any desire to be president and consistency supported Biden being the nominee. He's just being factually accurate when he says this:
Sen. John Fetterman: "People pushed out an honorable man, loving father and a great president before an absolute sleazeball like Menendez. Congratulations."
2 contradictory thoughts. They either wanted Biden to stay in because he’s easier to beat than anyone else, or they wanted Biden out because he would be harder to beat than Harris. I probably didn’t make that clear.It's pretty easy to work through logically.. they thought defeating Biden was essentially in the bag, they may still think they'll defeat Kamala but now the scene has been shaken up and if the trajectory you felt before was certain victory.. you didn't really want anything to shake that.
Oh yeah I understood.2 contradictory thoughts. They either wanted Biden to stay in because he’s easier to beat than anyone else, or they wanted Biden out because he would be harder to beat than Harris. I probably didn’t make that clear.
All of that is understood and why I wasn’t making the argument that corporations aren’t making any contributions.
There is abundant room for improvement, however, and that is going to require changes to tax rates at the higher levels, or reduced services, or costs passed on to workers.
It's pretty easy to work through logically.. they thought defeating Biden was essentially in the bag, they may still think they'll defeat Kamala but now the scene has been shaken up and if the trajectory you felt before was certain victory.. you didn't really want anything to shake that.
So I have seen two things happening at the same time on Twitter. Several people, some media, some former Rs like Sarah Longwell, have posted that the Trump campaign is in shambles over this. They’re not sure they want to face Harris, they’re doubting their strategy of trying to get Biden out now.
At the same time random MAGAs in the comments are saying that’s not true - like they would know. And swearing they wanted Biden out because he’s harder to beat than Harris.
Just nice to see the chaos on the other side for a change.
There's also the cost of doing health care business, both operational and legal. I read somewhere that last year, in Louisiana alone, more than $400,000,000 were awarded by juries in punitive damages, and one of the businesses hit the biggest were pharmaceuticals. That's something that's not going to happen in other countries. In MX, there would be fines, criminal charges, but tribunals (no jury trials in MX) are not going to award millions to anyone.