Search results for query: *

It's a heart being hugged, if that helps.

If being manly means burning my mouth and not getting to cool it down with ice cream, then I don't wanna be a man.

GOP on GOP violence there, with the mayor Knox County, TN delivering the Tombstone.

Stop shifting the goalposts. Nobody is comparing US politics to Nazism. What people are saying- and showing proof to back it up- is that Trump's rhetoric is eerily similar to that of Hitler. If I show you actual examples of this, will you believe it?

You didn't pay attention, then. That's your fault.

No you haven't. You've said why you think neither candidate was the best the respective parties could have put forward. I am asking you why you think they are unfit to hold office.

Which do you think is better for democracy, electing someone with legal proposals or electing someone with illegal proposals and hoping that the courts side against them?

What makes Kamala unfit for office and what makes Trump unfit for office?

You still can't articulate how Kamala was a poor candidate, especially when compared with Trump. Tell me, Joe. What made Kamala a "poor candidate" and what made Trump "not the best the GOP has to offer"?

Not a high bar, to be fair.

Again, you keep saying the exact things Kamala was doing, yet you insist on this both sides bullshirt. I never said Trump insulted the electorate, but now that you mention it, he did. It wasn't even subtle.

I'm not saying it works. I am saying that your argument is crap. This is what you said:"Better candidates, better policy, better messaging. Actually listening to the electorate and addressing their concerns instead of insulting their intelligence and telling them what THEY think.We need...

President CM Punk? I'll take it.

More both sides bullshirt. One campaign ran on fear, hate, and lies. One campaign ran on policies and empathy.

Yet the guy who won did so by running a campaign built on demonization, violent rhetoric, and a distinct lack of dialogue, especially when it came to issues and policies.

This is like saying that you don't mind handing your house keys to a burglar because you have security cameras.

And you think it's a bad idea to follow treatment plans set forth by teams of doctors working closely with patients and their guardians?So you aren't a specialist in the field, yet you want to speak with authority when it comes to decrying how immoral the specialists are?

This is such a ridiculous argument. It's a forking copout. This was my exact attitude when I was 20. Now I've matured into an adult. I'd be embarrassed to have this mindset in my 60s.

Are you a physician or employed in the medical field?

You are aware that these aren't situations where parents are randomly deciding to consent to the whims of a child, right? That there are teams of doctors and professionals involved at every step?