Search results for query: *

That makes sense. Why would someone concerned with the amendments protecting the people and the state from federal overreach be worried about massive overreach and blatant illegality by the federal government...

I agree 100%. The issue is that one side acted in good faith, and Pam Bondi is a partisan hack who used her power to spite the lawful decision of a group of federal judges.

A political food fight started by Pam Bondi after the judges pointed out that there is a time limit at the buffet, and Habba has been there long enough that she's about to violate the rules put in place by management.The judges acted within the scope of the law. Bondi fired someone in order to...

Did the judges follow the law, yes or no?

So what you are saying is that the judges followed the law and Pam Bondi subverted the law in order to nullify the judges' legal obligations. Sounds like Bondi is a radical activist and should be decried as such. Wanna join me in calling for her immediate termination?

If this has been you trying, your effort has been seriously lacking.

You didn't answer the question he asked. If the question had been:"Do you expect LEO and the DOJ to protect and defend the Constitution and its amendments and faithfully execute the laws of the United States?"Then you would have answered his question. But that was clearly not the question he...

He tried to retain power when he lost in 2020, yet his party and the electorate tolerated it.

I didn't present an either/or option. You are struggling to follow some pretty basic conversations here.You have already demonstrated that your ability to think is flawed, so... yeah.

That's not what I said, Joe. There is a difference between a hate group agreeing with one of your positions and you agreeing with the positions of a hate group.I would also add that Optimus explained quite well why there are times when "I don't give a damn" is woefully inadequate.

You don't give a damn if they agree with you, but do you give a damn if you realize that you agree with them?

It's been spelled out for you already, but sure. I am not saying I am 100% right (or right in any way), I am just offering an opinion based on our interactions.I think there's a chance that you like certain policies, but don't want to be associated with the white supremacists and neo-nazis...

Your failure to understand the simple point being made- one that LA spelled out in plain language- is solely your fault. I don't know if it's because of a blind hyperpartisan mindset, cognitive dissonance fed by a deep-seated need to avoid an ugly truth, or just a simple inability to understand...

How many curious eyes found their way to these files, I wonder...

Yeah, I got to watch it this morning. It's really frigging funny.

Why are you so hesitant to answer now? You had no problem playing games and strawmanning. You had no problem engaging in your own evasive way. Now that there's no wiggle room left, though, you clam up. Why is that?

Patches O'Houlihan would be proud.

Of the evidence provided to support the assertion that neo-nazis and their ilk support the GOP. There is plenty to look at in this post:https://madaboutpolitics.com/threads/republican-assault-on-public-education.279890/page-26#post-581744

Side note, I just saw that guy on an episode of Game Changer. He's pretty funny.

What's wrong with the evidence provided? Why do you not consider it when forming your opinion?