Harris VP watch (8 Viewers)

SaintForLife said:

Not even close to true lol

Click to expand...

Actually very true. There have only been a few times and those have been recent where the media have not prostrated themselves at his feet. The amount or oral ministrations the media has performed on Trump would put Deep Throat in the shade. Your foolish claims that the media is deferential to Democrats is laughable.

SaintForLife said:

It's swiftboating to highlight the many times that Walz has lied about his military record?

Click to expand...

It's swiftboating to repeatedly lie about Walz lying about his military record, because Waltz hasn't lied about his military record.

Are you ever going to stop spamming the board with lies? Are you ever going to post something that is actually accurate and true?

SaintForLife said:

Ah I see. You want me to extend a courtesy to you all that you don't extend to me?

Click to expand...

Are you a masochist?

Evidently the sources for all these smears on Walz just aren’t all that credible. Just some are easily fooled and have just an incredible amount of confirmation bias.

Now they are going after a post about his pet. The second dog is the dog his dog was playing with at the park.

Nebaghead said:

Now they are going after a post about his pet. The second dog is the dog his dog was playing with at the park.

Click to expand...

Gets more ridiculous and desperate with each passing day

Nebaghead said:

Now they are going after a post about his pet. The second dog is the dog his dog was playing with at the park.

Click to expand...

And, I just posted this in the media thread because NewsMax actually ran the story.

bird said:

Actually very true. There have only been a few times and those have been recent where the media have not prostrated themselves at his feet. The amount or oral ministrations the media has performed on Trump would put Deep Throat in the shade. Your foolish claims that the media is deferential to Democrats is laughable.

Click to expand...

Okay buddy. That's hilarious

SaintForLife said:

Okay buddy. That's hilarious

Click to expand...

Lol. I don't think even you could cover Trump without it being negative coverage. His entire campaign is "American Carnage." How do you cover that in a positive light?

That's not even taking into account all of his senile rants, post and actions. And you know as well as I do that Trump thrives off of that negative coverage, as do his MAGA faithful. Your world wouldn't be the same without it.

SaintForLife said:

Okay buddy. That's hilarious

Click to expand...

Tell us about “newsbusters” please.

to be fair, if they did an article or a segment only using his own words, they would consider that negative..

MT15 said:

Tell us about “newsbusters” please.

Click to expand...

their home page is 100% or what they accuse other of . lol

Bigdaddysaints said:

their home page is 100% or what they accuse other of . lol

Click to expand...

Thanks. I know SFL won’t come clean about them.

Oh, it’s actually worse than I imagined. On the page for the study they have a testimonial from … wait for it … Rush Limbaugh, that paragon of unbiased news coverage.

They also show this on the same page.



And the article did present some facts about minutes devoted, but then devolved into partisan sniping and moaning. Never mind that it was a really BIG news story, and so would tend to dominate the news.

Oh, and guess who they have done a Special Report on? You will never guess.

SFL - the parent of Newsbusters is Media Research Center. They are operating as a not-for-profit, but with a decided partisan bias. They tell you so right up front. The fact that you think they are credible and actual news organizations are not is just crazy. Like you may need an intervention, dude.

At least you should be dimly aware of the biased nature of what you post and not delude yourself into thinking that just because you think it’s an “independent” news source means it has any credibility at all. That article is straight up biased propaganda.

Here’s how they describe themselves.

“Welcome to NewsBusters, Exposing and Combating Liberal Media Bias 24/7, a project of the Media Research Center (MRC), America’s leading media watchdog in documenting, exposing and neutralizing liberal media bias.”

Dude, everyone here knows your sources are trash. Straight up. You’re not fooling anyone.

SaintForLife said:

Okay buddy. That's hilarious

Click to expand...

Thanks! That was funny. A RWNJ website claims there is left bias in the media. The entire 2016 campaign Trump got basically free media coverage with little to no push back on his bullschlitz. Then your false god kicked off an attempted coup. Now, finally in the last several months the media is exposing him for what he is: a rapidly declining, severely racist, misogynistic, buffoon with no concept of morality and whose only goals are to grift and keep himself out of jail. Great guy you picked to worship.

Why do you hate America?

Interesting insider tidbit. Wonder if Vance will do anything about it or just leave it be?

There are still big social media accounts pushing lies about Walz. Thankfully it doesn’t seem to have much traction, but posting this in case anyone gets questions from people about these lies.