Hunter Biden (7 Viewers)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 8 (members: 0, guests: 8)

    FullMonte

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Nov 14, 2019
    Messages
    1,492
    Reaction score
    2,584
    Age
    57
    Location
    Bossier City
    Offline
    Lost in all the news coverage about what's going on in the US right now is this bit of information.

    The Ukrainian government has completed an audit of thousands of case files related to Burisma. Ruslan Ryaboshapka (the prosecutor general), described by Zelenskiy as "100 percent my person" in the July phone call with president Trump said "I specifically asked prosecutors to check especially carefully those facts about Biden's alleged involvement. They answered that there was nothing of the kind."

    Not that anyone SHOULD be surprised to find out that Hunter Biden was not implicated in something that was done by the CEO of Burisma in his role as a government employee, that happened two years before Biden joined the board.

    www.theguardian.com

    Ukrainian prosecutors find no evidence against Hunter Biden

    Audit probed energy company Burisma, of which Biden was a board member from 2014-2019
    www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
     
    DaveXA said:
    :spit:
    Click to expand...
    The DOJ filing disproves what yall have claimed about the Hunter Biden laptop and you talk about me drinking the kool-aid lol. Heaven forbid that you would comment on the DOJ filing.

    Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Because Hunter was selling access to his dad, but you knew that already.
    Click to expand...

    No, I don't. There is absolutely no evidence of that at all.

    But regardless, what does that have to do with the detail of Hunter's gun charges? Why should I care about that?
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Because Hunter was selling access to his dad, but you knew that already.
    Click to expand...
    No proof of that at all, and actual sworn testimony contradicting that. You just parrot made up shirt all the time from known liars, of which Miranda is a prime example of a known liar.

    What Hunter wanted to do was give the appearance of access. It’s not great, it’s a bit shady, which is why Joe didn’t want him to take the job. However, testimony so far has affirmed there was no actual influence on Joe, no actual access beyond polite niceties.

    You are misrepresenting the truth, but you know that.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    The DOJ filing disproves what yall have claimed about the Hunter Biden laptop and you talk about me drinking the kool-aid lol. Heaven forbid that you would comment on the DOJ filing.

    Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    Click to expand...
    Conflating gun charges and laptops and odd meetings and whatnot is all funny.
     
    MT15 said:
    No proof of that at all, and actual sworn testimony contradicting that. You just parrot made up shirt all the time from known liars, of which Miranda is a prime example of a known liar.

    What Hunter wanted to do was give the appearance of access. It’s not great, it’s a bit shady, which is why Joe didn’t want him to take the job. However, testimony so far has affirmed there was no actual influence on Joe, no actual access beyond polite niceties.

    You are misrepresenting the truth, but you know that.
    Click to expand...


    Full Post:

    Remember when Rep. @danielsgoldman went around to media outlets saying that Devon Archer testified that Hunter Biden was selling the "illusion of access" to his father?

    Well, according to the transcript, Goldman was trying to put words into his mouth.

    And Archer said it was not entirely right because Joe Biden still met with Hunter's business partners.

     
    SaintForLife said:
    Because Hunter was selling access to his dad, but you knew that already.
    Click to expand...
    right but have you said anything about trumps kids doing the same? what about trumps 9 mill from foreign governments? why so quiet on those things. what's good for the good is good for the you know. the rest.
     
    fooferdoggie said:
    right but have you said anything about trumps kids doing the same? what about trumps 9 mill from foreign governments? why so quiet on those things. what's good for the good is good for the you know. the rest.
    Click to expand...
    Expose them all. I would support any investigations into exposing corruption in both parties.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Expose them all. I would support any investigations into exposing corruption in both parties.
    Click to expand...
    No you wouldn’t. You have been against every investigation into Trump and strangely silent or make flimsy excuses whenever it is found that he did anything wrong.
     
    SaintForLife said:


    Full Post:

    Remember when Rep. @danielsgoldman went around to media outlets saying that Devon Archer testified that Hunter Biden was selling the "illusion of access" to his father?

    Well, according to the transcript, Goldman was trying to put words into his mouth.

    And Archer said it was not entirely right because Joe Biden still met with Hunter's business partners.

    Click to expand...

    That is simply not true. Did you read the transcript yourself? I did, and I can assure you that things are not what you are being told there.
     
    MT15 said:
    That is simply not true. Did you read the transcript yourself? I did, and I can assure you that things are not what you are being told there.
    Click to expand...
    As you would tell me, you have been lied to by the propagandists you follow. You should probably re-evaluate the people you follow.

    What I posted above has screenshots of the transcripts. The illusion of access came from Goldman and not Archer.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    As you would tell me, you have been lied to by the propagandists you follow. You should probably re-evaluate the people you follow.

    What I posted above has screenshots of the transcripts. The illusion of access came from Goldman and not Archer.
    Click to expand...

    You mean when Goldman used the phrase and Archer agreed with the phrasing.
     
    cuddlemonkey said:
    You mean when Goldman used the phrase and Archer agreed with the phrasing.
    Click to expand...
    Not quite.

    "Almost fair"

    1000004194.jpg
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Not quite.

    "Almost fair"

    1000004194.jpg
    Click to expand...
    I see your "almost fair" (Notice that they don't continue the pages why he explains why 'almost'?) and raise you a "right."

    1705526573230.png


    NOTE: "Right. An illusion of access to his father,..." is Archer's own words confirming that. So the tweet you posted saying that "illusion of access" is not from Archer's testimony is a straight up LIE.
     
    SaintForLife said:
    Not quite.

    "Almost fair"

    1000004194.jpg
    Click to expand...

    Ever wonder why the answer to that last question is cut off?

    "A Because there -- there is -- there are touch points and contact points that I can't deny that happened, but nothing of material was discussed. But I can't go on record saying that there was -- there was communications."
     

    Attachments

    • Screenshot 2024-01-17 3.17.43 PM.png
      Screenshot 2024-01-17 3.17.43 PM.png
      76.3 KB · Views: 71

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom