Miscellaneous Trump (4 Viewers)

[Huntn]

Anxiety surges as Donald Trump may be indicted soon: Why 2024 is 'the final battle' and 'the big one'​

Anxiety surges as Donald Trump may be indicted soon: Why 2024 is 'the final battle' and 'the big one'

Donald Trump's many legal problems – and calls for protests – have generated new fears of political violence and anxiety about the 2024 election.

www.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON – It looks like American politics is entering a new age of anxiety, triggered by an unprecedented legal development: The potential indictment of a former president and current presidential candidate.

Donald Trump's many legal problems – and calls for protests by his followers – have generated new fears of political violence and anxiety about the unknowable impact all this will have on the already-tense 2024 presidential election

I’ll reframe this is a more accurate way, Are Presidents above the law? This new age was spurred into existence when home grown dummies elected a corrupt, mentally ill, anti-democratic, would be dictator as President and don’t bother to hold him responsible for his crimes, don’t want to because in the ensuing mayhem and destruction, they think they will be better off. The man is actually advocating violence (not the first time). And btw, screw democracy too. If this feeling spreads, we are In deep shirt.

This goes beyond one treasonous Peice of work and out to all his minions. This is on you or should we be sympathetic to the idea of they can’t help being selfish suckers to the Nation’s detriment? Donald Trump is the single largest individual threat to our democracy and it‘s all going to boil down to will the majority of the GOP return to his embrace and start slinging his excrement to support him?

 

[Booker]

The difference between Biden and Mr Armageddon is so stark it’s an easy way of figuring out who in this country is so selfish they’ve left reality or have a group death wish, but are too challenged to recognize their path.

I hardly ever even thought of Joe Biden while he was president. I miss that.

 

[TampaJoe]

Bothsidesism at its finest, Joe. Only one party continued to endorse a mentally declining man close to 80 years old, and that's the party you keep voting for.

Yeah right. Had it not been fo the debate, he would have been the candidate and you would have voted for and defended him. So dont try and sell me that line of bull. I dont buy it for a second.

 

[TampaJoe]

The difference between Biden and Mr Armageddon is so stark it’s an easy way of figuring out who in this country is so selfish they’ve left reality or have a group death wish, but are too challenged to recognize their path.

Thats not the point. Neither man was for the office and yet thats what the political parties gave us for candidates. We werent choosing between the two best candidates. We were choosing the lesser of two evils. When that is the choice, the outcome is unpredictable.

 

[CoolBrees]

Even if he was dead I would vote for Joe Biden over this clusterf-

 

[TampaJoe]

Even if he was dead I would vote for Joe Biden over this clusterf-

Thats my point. People on the other side feel just as strongly. You may not understand the “why” but the fact remains. This country is highly polarized and neither is nominating candidates with broad appeal.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

Yeah right. Had it not been fo the debate, he would have been the candidate and you would have voted for and defended him. So dont try and sell me that line of bull. I dont buy it for a second.

Here in the real world, Biden wasn't the candidate, and the only old man showing signs of severe mental decline was the guy your party supported. Nobody gives a damn about hypotheticals of the past when we have reality to contend with.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

Thats not the point. Neither man was for the office and yet thats what the political parties gave us for candidates. We werent choosing between the two best candidates. We were choosing the lesser of two evils. When that is the choice, the outcome is unpredictable.

Holy shirt, Biden was on the ballot in Florida? That's wild.

 

[RobF]

Here in the real world, Biden wasn't the candidate, and the only old man showing signs of severe mental decline was the guy your party supported. Nobody gives a damn about hypotheticals of the past when we have reality to contend with.

See, that's what gets me.

I'm sitting over here just watching what's been going on over there, and the reality is so overwhelming that even though we're only just over 11 weeks into Trump's administration, there is zero, not a shadow of a, you'd have to have been living in a cave on the Moon to have any, doubt that even a full-on "Weekend at Bernie's" scenario Biden administration would, when the alternative has been this, have been clearly the right choice.

And yet you still have people chirping, "Ohhh, but Biden, both sides, no great candidates really, both sides both sides both sides," even when a Biden administration would, a) obviously have been vastly better than what's going on, and b) wasn't on the ballot.

Like, this is not even remotely worth engaging with. I'm only posting this because it's just that ludicrous it's hard not to.

 

[efil4]

Thats not the point. Neither man was for the office and yet thats what the political parties gave us for candidates. We werent choosing between the two best candidates. We were choosing the lesser of two evils. When that is the choice, the outcome is unpredictable.

ummm the adage is choosing between the lesser of two evils.

And you end up WITH the LESSER of two evils.



Because, predictably, folks will not CHOOSE the GREATER EVIL.

so its totally predictable, hence the "lesser" part.

 

[TampaJoe]

Holy shirt, Biden was on the ballot in Florida? That's wild.

You are acting like he wasn‘t headed to the nomination. Democrats didnt vote him out. They had already voted him in. He had all the delegates. And then the debate. Then it became apparent to a few prominent Democrats that the gig was up and they all but forced Biden to drop out. They couldnt gaslight the general public any longer. Had it not been forthe debate, Biden would have been the nominee. He had the delegates. And you would have supported and defended that decision.

I get it. I woudnt have voted for Trump either. But up until the debate, Biden was the nominee. And he was not fit for the job. Obviously.

Both parties need to up their game. I dont think we can continue to operate in sucha highly divisive and hyperpartisan environment. Political disagreements shouldn't devolve into violent confrontations. Lincoln spoke of a house divided. We are there.

 

[TampaJoe]

ummm the adage is choosing between the lesser of two evils.

And you end up WITH the LESSER of two evils.



Because, predictably, folks will not CHOOSE the GREATER EVIL.

so its totally predictable, hence the "lesser" part.

Have you ever had to choose between the lesser of two evils? Damnd if you do and damned if don‘t decision. Ask yourself if it would have or could have been different with a better candidate.

You can complain because you didnt win. Understandable. But the truth is it was far from your best effort. Not your best candidate.

 

[efil4]

Have you ever had to choose between the lesser of two evils? Damnd if you do and damned if don‘t decision. Ask yourself if it would have or could have been different with a better candidate.

You can complain because you didnt win. Understandable. But the truth is it was far from your best effort. Not your best candidate.

if you do live in Fl- you do it every year you look at home insurance.

Thats why you go with the LESSER - And what you are telling me is that, Harris was ostensibly, based on campaign promises, WORSE than Trump, yeah?

And if you are a single-issue voter, we can stop discussion now as you are wasting my time.

 

[TampaJoe]

if you do live in Fl- you do it every year you look at home insurance.

Thats why you go with the LESSER - And what you are telling me is that, Harris was ostensibly, based on campaign promises, WORSE than Trump, yeah?

And if you are a single-issue voter, we can stop discussion now as you are wasting my time.

I‘m not a single issue voter. And we are not talking about insurance. We are discussing choosing the leader of the free world. Big difference. We SHOULD be choosing between the very best this country has to offer. Its that important. But that is not what is happening. We SHOULD be choosing the best of the best and NOT the lesser of two evils.

The system used by our political parties for choosing candidates is lacking something. I am not sure what the answer is but obviously none of the candidates (TrumpBidenHarris) was the best of the best. Not even close.

We need someone capable of governing without further dividing this country.

 

[DaveXA]

Have you ever had to choose between the lesser of two evils? Damnd if you do and damned if don‘t decision. Ask yourself if it would have or could have been different with a better candidate.

You can complain because you didnt win. Understandable. But the truth is it was far from your best effort. Not your best candidate.

Sorry, but Trump was absolutely not the lesser of 2 evils between him and Harris. Biden wasn't the candidate. The what-ifs are neither here or there.

Neither were the best candidates, but let's focus on the actual candidates, not what should have been.

 

[MT15]

Guys, it’s just not an honest take. Not worth engaging with a poster who’s in total denial of reality.

 

[coldseat]

I‘m not a single issue voter. And we are not talking about insurance. We are discussing choosing the leader of the free world. Big difference. We SHOULD be choosing between the very best this country has to offer. Its that important. But that is not what is happening. We SHOULD be choosing the best of the best and NOT the lesser of two evils.

The system used by our political parties for choosing candidates is lacking something. I am not sure what the answer is but obviously none of the candidates (TrumpBidenHarris) was the best of the best. Not even close.

We need someone capable of governing without further dividing this country.

That was Harris. You should have voted for her.

The whole, Biden v. Trump argument is pointless given that Democrats did replace their candidate after Biden (under pressure) dropped out. It doesn't really matter in the end how it happened, we had a much better choice in Harris than we did in Trump.

Also, Trump's first debate against Biden and second debate against Harris should have both ended his political career (hell, the insurrection should have done that), like they did for Biden. They would have at any other time in our history. But Republicans are a cult.

 

[efil4]

I‘m not a single issue voter. And we are not talking about insurance. We are discussing choosing the leader of the free world. Big difference. We SHOULD be choosing between the very best this country has to offer. Its that important. But that is not what is happening. We SHOULD be choosing the best of the best and NOT the lesser of two evils.

The system used by our political parties for choosing candidates is lacking something. I am not sure what the answer is but obviously none of the candidates (TrumpBidenHarris) was the best of the best. Not even close.

We need someone capable of governing without further dividing this country.

YOU said the lesser of two evils.

For me, it wasnt a "lesser of two evils" choice in 2024. Apparently for you, it was. And you chose the GREATER of the two.

and LOL at the "best" - in a utopia, yes you would have the "best of the best" - but what you do have is candidates and understand who they will surround themselves with ( because a CEO/POTUS is only as good as those immediately around them)
And in 2024 you KNEW who Trump would surround himself with as well as Harris.

And you chose Trump and his choices knowing full well what his plan was. If you were hopeful that his campaign promises were "exaggerated" , after so many people were telling you he was serious, but you simply couldnt believe it because for whatever reason you aligned with that candidate as the LESSER of two evils between he and Harris. You were conned.

Now you get to reap the consequences of your choice and watch your every day expenses rise, your wealth decline with no true action plan to lower prices/increase your wealth.


and yes we arent talking about insurance, but the analogy is correct. You SHOULD have access to the BEST INSURERS, but you DONT.( Because of your risk/exposures the BEST INSURERS DONT WANT ) So now you have to CHOOSE between LESSER INSURERS or simply go uninsured. Same scenario here.

 

[Saint Jack]

Yeah right. Had it not been fo the debate, he would have been the candidate and you would have voted for and defended him. So dont try and sell me that line of bull. I dont buy it for a second.

The difference between the two is that Biden never went on a rant about wanting to annex Canada.