What happens to the Republican Party now? (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    MT15

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Mar 13, 2019
    Messages
    17,985
    Reaction score
    24,888
    Location
    Midwest
    Offline
    This election nonsense by Trump may end up splitting up the Republican Party. I just don’t see how the one third (?) who are principled conservatives can stay in the same party with Trump sycophants who are willing to sign onto the TX Supreme Court case.

    We also saw the alt right types chanting “destroy the GOP” in Washington today because they didn’t keep Trump in power. I think the Q types will also hold the same ill will toward the traditional Republican Party. In fact its quite possible that all the voters who are really in a Trump personality cult will also blame the GOP for his loss. It’s only a matter of time IMO before Trump himself gets around to blaming the GOP.

    There is some discussion of this on Twitter. What do you all think?



     
    Good read

    And as usual it seems like democrats are yet again perfectly content to sit back and Fox and GOP set the narrative

    We’ve talked about it before how part of the “adults in the room” role is ignoring childish games and antics

    It’s not until election time that they realize “people actually listen and believe that stuff?”
    =========
    In recent days I’ve seen every major paper write a version of the How Did This Tragic Train Derailment Become a New Culture War story. I didn’t need to ask myself whether any of them gave the actual answer, which I think most of us know.

    How is it that a train derailment caused by a major GOP-donating corporation, in a state run by a Republican governor, caused at least in part by regulations rolled back by Republican President Donald Trump … well, how exactly is that a story about Democrats not caring about people in “flyover country”?

    The Republican crackpot investigations complex is even now prepping to hold hearings about it. The reality of the situation is that big corporations like Norfolk Southern spend millions in Washington for lax regulation and our railroad infrastructure is woefully aged and deficient — and not just for freight rail.

    Virtually every upgrade to the country’s railroad infrastructure and the quality of its rail stock pays dividends either in safety or efficiency. Republicans are simultaneously calling out corporations for not caring about ordinary Americans while carrying their anti-regulatory water on Capitol Hill.

    Democrats should run a freight train right through that contradiction. Only good things can come of it……..

     
    Last edited:
    I didn't know the term 'woke' went back to the 1940s
    ==================================

    The fact is that conservatives don’t like the concept of “woke” these days.

    Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, the potential Republican presidential candidate, has repeatedly said that his state is where “woke goes to die”. Former president Donald Trump has talked about generals being too “woke”.

    Mr DeSantis did not attend the Conservative Political Action Conference just outside Washington this week. But plenty of others focused on “wokeness”.

    Presidential hopeful Nikki Haley said that “I’m running for president to renew an America that’s proud and strong, not weak and woke.” Senator Tommy Tuberville of Alabama held a talk on the first full day of the conference entitled “Sacking the Woke Playbook”.

    “Today, they are being indoctrinated with all this woke — transgender athletes, CRT, 1619,” Mr Tuberville said in reference to allowing transgender athletes; critical race theory, the niche legal theory that many conservatives have used as a catch-all to describe education about Black history and racism; and the 1619 Project, the project by The New York Times led by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones that chronicles the impact of slavery in the founding and present day of the United States.

    Black Americans largely adopted the term “woke” going back as late as the 1940s as a phrase meant to be aware of racism around them and became a staple of African American Vernacular English (AAVE). But plenty of activists at CPAC had a different definition.

    Marleen Laska, a conservative activist from Pennsylvania who attended the conference, has a broad definition of what “woke” meant.

    “That’s a loaded question,” she said. “It covers so many things. It incorporated all the stupidity that is going on with the country.”..............

     
    Nothing to see here, just because Arkansas is trying to make it okay for a child to work without parental permission doesn’t mean they don’t care about kids. Theoretically, it wouldn’t be illegal for said child to work at a drag show, would it? 🤦‍♀️

     
    Republican activists took over a college in the Idaho panhandle and have driven it into the ground.

    Trustees backed by the Kootenai County GOP took over the governing majority of North Idaho College and denounced alleged liberal "indoctrination" by the faculty and vowed to root out "deep state" corruption in the school administration, but their leadership resulted in lawsuits from two of the past five school presidents and Moody's downgraded their debt over “significant governance and management dysfunction," reported the New York Times.

    “As a businessperson here, it’s heartbreaking to me to be standing on the brink of the loss of this institution,” said Eve Knudtsen, a Republican who owns a Chevrolet dealership outside of Couer d'Alene.

    The regional higher education commission warned the 90-year-old college known for its technical training programs could be stripped of its accreditation if changes weren't made within weeks, which would effectively shut down the community college attended by about 4,600 students.

    Conservative retirees from other states have flocked to the county, where Donald Trump won 70 percent of the vote in 2020, and GOP activists set their sights on the college after its diversity council issued a statement of support for social justice demonstrations after the police killing of George Floyd.

    “The mission of the Republican Party in Kootenai County is to try to find people who will run for office — any office, from sewer districts to school boards to trustee boards — who embrace the policies of the Republican Party as outlined in our platform,” said Brent Regan, chairman of the Kootenai County Republican Central Committee..............

     
    Nothing to see here, just because Arkansas is trying to make it okay for a child to work without parental permission doesn’t mean they don’t care about kids. Theoretically, it wouldn’t be illegal for said child to work at a drag show, would it? 🤦‍♀️




    How else we gonna manufacture cheap goods once Trump is POTUS and we seal off all trade with China? Those widgets aint gonna make themselves and no one is going to shell out $500 for a widget that used to cost $10.

    Sanders is forward thinkin! Arkansas- hub of US mfg.

    LOLOLOL.
     
    Where are the free speech defenders now? The ones who had the vapors over the “Twitter Files”?


    I see you are gaslighting again. You know the Twitter Files were about the government pressuring social media companies to censor American citizens online speech. This doesn’t include the government.
     
    I see you are gaslighting again. You know the Twitter Files were about the government pressuring social media companies to censor American citizens online speech. This doesn’t include the government.

    He is saying this in his capacity as an appointed (by the governor of Florida) memeber of the board of trustees of a public university. That is very much coming from the government.
     
    I see you are gaslighting again. You know the Twitter Files were about the government pressuring social media companies to censor American citizens online speech. This doesn’t include the government.
    So, you love to project don’t you? I’m not gaslighting, you are.

    There’s no evidence of government censorship on Twitter. None. There were requests made by both parties. Both parties. Just like any person can report a post. Twitter ignored those it didn’t think were legit complaints, and acted on those it determined did violate its policies. In fact, the requests made by the Biden campaign were specifically not government censorship because he wasn’t part of government at the time. The Trump campaign’s requests are murkier, since he was actually POTUS at the time. This isn’t hard, SFL,

    You also may want to review the term “public university”. 🤦‍♀️ You keep clowning yourself.
     
    All 26 Republicans on the powerful House Oversight Committee have refused to sign a simple, two-sentence statement denouncing white supremacy.

    "We, Members of the Committee on Oversight and Accountability, together denounce white nationalism and white supremacy in all its forms, including the 'Great Replacement' conspiracy theory. These hateful and dangerous ideologies have no place in the work of the United States Congress or our Committee," the statement (copy below) from Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) reads.

    It comes after several Oversight Committee Republicans "invoked dangerous and conspiratorial rhetoric echoing the racist and nativist tropes peddled by white supremacists and right-wing extremists," during a February hearing on the "border crisis," Ranking Member Raskin said in a March 5 letter to Committee Chair James Comer (photo, top.) The Washington Post first reported on Raskin’s letter.

    "In particular, some Members repeatedly described the number of migrants arriving at the border as an 'invasion,' and even went so far as to falsely accuse the Biden-Harris Administration of implementing a plan 'to deliberately open our border' for purposes of 'changing our culture'—mirroring language often used by MAGA extremists who believe that pro-immigration policies are designed to replace white populations with non-white immigrants and other racial minorities," Raskin's letter says.............

     
    so it looks like we may actually be doing this

    Is economic chaos the point? That the GOP can hammer Biden and Dems for the cratered economy for the campaign? And hope that they avoid getting blamed for it?
    ============================================================================
    House Republicans are readying a proposal that would prepare the U.S. government in the event of a default, as GOP leaders and the White House remain at distant odds over the fate of the debt ceiling.

    The House Ways and Means Committee, led by Rep. Jason T. Smith (R-Mo.), announced that the panel will consider a measure Thursday that would prioritize some federal payments over others, arguing it would protect U.S. credit if the two parties cannot reach a deal over the country’s ability to borrow to pay its bills.

    The debt ceiling sets the legal limit for how much the government can borrow to pay for spending Congress has already authorized, and lawmakers must raise or suspend the cap by later this year — or risk a fiscal calamity with global implications. Republicans have seized on the urgent task to try to secure steep spending cuts from the White House, an approach that has drawn President Biden’s ire over the risks it poses to the U.S. economy.

    A default could cost the United States millions of jobs, plunge the nation into a recession and rattle markets around the world, according to federal officials and top economists. And it would force the sprawling government to make unprecedented, difficult decisions about the programs to sustain, since Washington runs an annual deficit that totaled $1.4 trillion in the 2022 fiscal year.

    The Republican approach, generally known as “debt prioritization,” would serve as an emergency road map for a default. Under an early version of the legislation, dubbed the Default Prevention Act, the GOP proposal would allow the government to continue borrowing to make payments on existing debt and issue benefit checks to seniors on Social Security. An updated version, circulated later Wednesday, sets up a system of tiers to prioritize other payments, including on defense and care for veterans, before others. In the meantime, it would bar members of Congress from receiving salaries during such a fiscal crisis.............


     
    Scary stuff
    ==============

    The anti-government Boogaloo Bois are regrouping ahead of next year's presidential elections after law enforcement nearly wiped out the militant movement, according to a new report.

    Hawaiian shirt-wearing members of the loosely organized group were implicated in a number of shootings, particularly around protests over George Floyd's police murder, and implicated in plots to sabotage power grids and a conspiracy to kidnap Michigan's governor, but social media companies finally disrupted their communications and the FBI started rounding them up, reported Vice News.

    “The fact of the matter is the FBI won,” a once-prominent Boogaloo from Texas recently posted online.

    But some members who drifted away from the movement are returning, while new members are being recruited with fantasies of an "armed revolt" against police and other government agents in what they see as a fight against tyranny, and their once hard-to-define ideology has been whittled down to a 22-page manifesto.

    “The difference between now and 2020 is they have their ideology figured out,” said Katie Paul, director of the watchdog Tech Transparency Project. “I'm extremely concerned because with these new Boog groups, there's no longer any effort to appear to be careful in terms of what they're posting. They're going straight to the ‘kill tyrants,' ‘kill congresspeople’ memes.”

    The group's reemergence seems to coincide with the FBI search of Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort looking for classified materials, which triggered a wave of violent threats from his supporters, and they remain angry at the bureau for infiltrating their ranks and believe federal agents fomented the Jan. 6 insurrection.

    “The people that were arrested, the people that were charged, they just made us more angry, they made us more hateful towards the government,” said Mike Dunn, a former U.S. Marine who joined the movement three years ago but left after the crackdown. “That hatred for the U.S. government is just sitting there. We’re thinking. We’re learning to be smart.”.........

     
    for what it's worth

    i find this poll surprising, it feels like it's been years since I've heard the term 'woke' in it's original intended use
    ====================================================

    Washington, DC, March 8th, 2023 – A new USA Today/Ipsos poll finds that Americans are divided on whether “woke” is a compliment or an insult. When asked what it means to be "woke," however, a majority say it entails being informed about social injustices rather than being overly politically correct. Differences by party and age emerge around views on “wokeness,” with Democrats and younger Americans more likely to see “wokeness” as a compliment than Republicans and older Americans, respectively.

    Detailed Findings:

    1. Americans are divided on whether “woke” is an insult or a compliment. This division is largely fueled by differences in party affiliation and age.

    • Two in five (40%) say they consider “woke” to be an insult, but about a third (32%) consider it a compliment.
    • While a majority of Republicans (60%) and a plurality of independents (42%) consider “woke” to be an insult, nearly half of Democrats (46%) say they take it as a compliment.
    • Similarly, Americans ages 18-34 (43%) are more likely than those ages 50-64 (23%) or 65+ (19%) to view “woke” as a compliment. Compared to those ages 18-34 (21%), though, Americans ages 65+ (38%) are significantly more likely to say they do not know what “woke” means.
    2. Americans are less divided over the definition of “wokeness,” as over half say “wokeness” means being informed about social injustices. Differences by party and age, however, remain present.

    • Fifty-six percent of Americans say “wokeness” encompasses being informed, educated on, and aware of social injustices. In contrast, two in five (39%) say “wokeness” involves being overly politically correct and policing others’ words.
    • A vast majority (78%) of Democrats say being “woke” means being informed, while nearly three-fifths (56%) of Republicans say it means being overly politically correct. Compared to Democrats and Republicans, however, independents are more divided on the definition of “wokeness,” as 51% say it involves being informed and 45% say it means being overly politically correct.
    • Americans ages 50-64 (48%) are more likely than those ages 18-34 (33%) or 35-49 (37%) to view “wokeness” as being overly politically correct...........
    =============================================

    Republican presidential hopefuls are vowing to wage a war on "woke," but a new USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll finds a majority of Americans are inclined to see the word as a positive attribute, not a negative one.

    Fifty-six percent of those surveyed say the term means "to be informed, educated on, and aware of social injustices." That includes not only three-fourths of Democrats but also more than a third of Republicans.

    Overall, 39% say instead that the word reflects what has become the GOP political definition, "to be overly politically correct and police others' words." That's the view of 56% of Republicans.

    The findings raise questions about whether Republican campaign promises to ban policies at schools and workplaces they denounce as "woke" could boost a contender in the party's primaries but put them at odds with broader public opinion in the general election.

    Independents, by 51%-45%, say "woke" means being aware of social injustice, not being overly politically correct.

    “Most Americans understand that to be woke is to be tuned in to injustices around us,” said Cliff Young of Ipsos. "But for a key segment of Republicans who make up the Trump-DeSantis base, 'woke' is a clear trigger for the worst of the politically correct, emerging multicultural majority.".............

     
    for what it's worth

    i find this poll surprising, it feels like it's been years since I've heard the term 'woke' in it's original intended use
    ====================================================

    Washington, DC, March 8th, 2023 – A new USA Today/Ipsos poll finds that Americans are divided on whether “woke” is a compliment or an insult. When asked what it means to be "woke," however, a majority say it entails being informed about social injustices rather than being overly politically correct. Differences by party and age emerge around views on “wokeness,” with Democrats and younger Americans more likely to see “wokeness” as a compliment than Republicans and older Americans, respectively.

    Detailed Findings:

    1. Americans are divided on whether “woke” is an insult or a compliment. This division is largely fueled by differences in party affiliation and age.

    • Two in five (40%) say they consider “woke” to be an insult, but about a third (32%) consider it a compliment.
    • While a majority of Republicans (60%) and a plurality of independents (42%) consider “woke” to be an insult, nearly half of Democrats (46%) say they take it as a compliment.
    • Similarly, Americans ages 18-34 (43%) are more likely than those ages 50-64 (23%) or 65+ (19%) to view “woke” as a compliment. Compared to those ages 18-34 (21%), though, Americans ages 65+ (38%) are significantly more likely to say they do not know what “woke” means.
    2. Americans are less divided over the definition of “wokeness,” as over half say “wokeness” means being informed about social injustices. Differences by party and age, however, remain present.

    • Fifty-six percent of Americans say “wokeness” encompasses being informed, educated on, and aware of social injustices. In contrast, two in five (39%) say “wokeness” involves being overly politically correct and policing others’ words.
    • A vast majority (78%) of Democrats say being “woke” means being informed, while nearly three-fifths (56%) of Republicans say it means being overly politically correct. Compared to Democrats and Republicans, however, independents are more divided on the definition of “wokeness,” as 51% say it involves being informed and 45% say it means being overly politically correct.
    • Americans ages 50-64 (48%) are more likely than those ages 18-34 (33%) or 35-49 (37%) to view “wokeness” as being overly politically correct...........
    =============================================

    Republican presidential hopefuls are vowing to wage a war on "woke," but a new USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll finds a majority of Americans are inclined to see the word as a positive attribute, not a negative one.

    Fifty-six percent of those surveyed say the term means "to be informed, educated on, and aware of social injustices." That includes not only three-fourths of Democrats but also more than a third of Republicans.

    Overall, 39% say instead that the word reflects what has become the GOP political definition, "to be overly politically correct and police others' words." That's the view of 56% of Republicans.

    The findings raise questions about whether Republican campaign promises to ban policies at schools and workplaces they denounce as "woke" could boost a contender in the party's primaries but put them at odds with broader public opinion in the general election.

    Independents, by 51%-45%, say "woke" means being aware of social injustice, not being overly politically correct.

    “Most Americans understand that to be woke is to be tuned in to injustices around us,” said Cliff Young of Ipsos. "But for a key segment of Republicans who make up the Trump-DeSantis base, 'woke' is a clear trigger for the worst of the politically correct, emerging multicultural majority.".............

    This is why yesterday I said to our thread colleague that I wish DeSantis would knock off the anti woke stuff. Enough already. Instinctively I felt anti woke should not be DeSantis's main focus.
     
    I saw a clip tonight where he is trying to claim that reports of books being banned and so forth are just lies from democrats, as is the claim he is against teaching black history. The problem with all this is in his previous comments, up to the very day before he tried to backtrack, he was crowing about being successful in such efforts. In fact, he actually said “you haven’t seen anything yet” about his anti-woke crusade.

    We also have videos of FL teachers like I posted in the LBGTQ thread telling how their school districts are making them remove books - even such books as a memoir from Wilma Rudolph or a book that recounts the true story of 2 male penguins in a zoo who successfully raised chicks. And their school districts are making them scan in every book in their classroom so that they can be ”vetted” and that they are no longer allowed to use any material in their classroom, not video, books, anything, unless it has been “vetted”. So, as she said, if her kids are having trouble with a concept and she wants to show them a video - it will need to go to the vetting body before she can show it - and they told her to allow at least 2 weeks for that process.

    I don’t see teachers putting up with this type of intrusion. DeSantis has decided to treat teachers as if they are not to be trusted as a general rule. These policies have made parents look at teachers with suspicion. And it’s all for a problem that I don’t believe exists in any meaningful way.

    It’s as if the government decided that rather than punishing people who speed, they will just install governors on everyone‘s car to make it impossible to drive more than 10 mph below the speed limit.
     
    guess this can go here
    ===============

    One afternoon a few weeks ago, Alicea Hotchkiss’s 14-year-old son, Eli, came home from his high school in Tampa with a question about something a classmate had said to him. He’d heard the student use the word “gay” as an insult, so Eli responded the way he always does when this happens. “Hey,” Eli said, “my dad’s gay.” But this time, Eli told his mom, the other kid offered a startling rebuke: You’re not allowed to say that at school.

    In a nearby community in central Florida, Barbara Mellen attended a recent open house at her son’s elementary school and asked her child’s teacher to suggest a few titles or authors that might help her second-grader develop more interest in reading. The teacher looked anxious, she says, and told her he couldn’t recommend any books.

    In the Facebook group Brittany Minor created five years ago for Black mothers like herself in Orlando, discussions among the 2,800 members have reached new depths of frustration and fatigue. These moms are watching what is happening in Florida, the shifting of the political and cultural environment around them, “and they are tired, they feel helpless, they feel hopeless,” Minor says. “The common thread is that people feel broken.”

    Adding to the members’ sense of distress and disorientation, Minor says, is the knowledge that so many of their neighbors supported the state’s pivot from purple to solid red. Under Gov. Ron DeSantis (R), who won reelection in a 20-point landslide in November and is poised for a potential presidential run, Florida has become the “center of gravity” for conservative policymaking, as James Nash, of the bipartisan ROKK Solutions public affairs strategy firm, has previously told The Washington Post. Florida families are now facing a slew of new laws and policy proposals that touch nearly every stage of parenting — from the reproductive health care a pregnant mother can receive, to the books available for an elementary school student to read, to the diversity and social culture awaiting students on college campuses.

    The effects are already far-reaching: The Parental Rights in Education Act — widely referred to by critics as “Don’t Say Gay” — prohibits educators in kindergarten through third grade from addressing gender or sexual orientation in class, and restricts what teachers in upper grades can say on the topic.

    The Stop Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees Act — or Stop WOKE — bars the teaching of critical race theory, an academic framework for examining systemic racism. Books for students of all ages have been removed from public school media centers and classroom libraries after a new state law mandated that all material made available to students be age-appropriate, free of “pornography” and “suited to student needs,” without providing clear guidelines about how those standards are to be applied.

    Just before the start of Florida’s legislative session this week, GOP lawmakers introduced a slate of new bills that would further overhaul both K-12 and higher education — expanding the limitations on teaching gender or sexual identity through eighth grade, and requiring teachers to use pronouns that match a child’s sex as assigned at birth, among other proposals.

    Beyond the public school system, Florida has moved on several fronts. Its medical boards have imposed rules barring transgender children from receiving gender-affirming medical care. On abortion, state law now prohibits the procedure beyond 15 weeks’ gestation, with few exceptions, and a new bill would tighten that restriction to six weeks. And on guns, lawmakers are pushing for legislation that would allow Florida residents to carry firearms without a state license.

    At the center of all of this are families trying to navigate the transforming legal landscape of their home state. Parents who do not support these measures describe feeling both fearful and furious. Some have embraced activism for the first time, while longtime advocates have grown more outspoken. Others are just trying to manage what this new reality means for their families and futures.

    When Eli wanted to know why his classmate said he couldn’t talk about his father at school, Hotchkiss, a mom of three boys who shares custody of the older two with her ex-husband, sat her son down and reiterated that there is nothing wrong with saying “gay.” But, she told him, a new law in their state means that if teachers talk about sexual orientation in certain ways, they can get in trouble. She had discussed this with her sons before, she says, but now Eli was experiencing the reverberations of the law for himself, and he stared at her, confounded. “But why?” he kept asking.

    For families like these in Florida, the difficult questions keep coming..................

     
    I’ll put this here

    Let’s not forget these people

    Curious what percentage were true believers vs knew it was a lie from the start
    =======================
    Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election brought the US to the brink of a democratic crisis.

    Refusing to concede his loss to Joe Biden, he attempted to use every lever available to try and throw out the results of the election, pressuring state lawmakers, Congress and the courts to declare him the winner.

    Those efforts didn’t succeed. But Trump nonetheless created a new poison that seeped deep in the Republican party – a belief that the results of US elections cannot be trusted.

    The belief quickly became Republican orthodoxy: it was embraced by Republican officeholders across the country as well as local activists who began to bombard and harass local election officials, forcing many of them to retire.

    The January 6 attack on the US Capitol – in which thousands stormed the building, and five people died – was the starkest reminder of the potential violent consequences of this rhetoric.

    In 2022, several Republicans who embraced election denialism lost their races to be the top election official in their state.

    But at the same time, many Republicans who unabashedly embraced the idea and aided Trump’s efforts to overturn the election were re-elected and, in some cases, elevated to higher office.

    Here’s a look at how some of those who tried to overturn the 2020 election have since been promoted into positions of power:

    Kevin McCarthy​

    Kevin McCarthy

    BEFOREHouse minority leader
    NOWSpeaker of the House

    One of the most prominent Republicans to vote against certifying the 2020 election, McCarthy now sets the GOP agenda in the House and will likely block any legislation to protect voting rights.

    McCarthy was one of 147 House Republicans who voted to reject Biden’s election victory in January 2021. Then the House minority leader, McCarthy privately criticized Trump in the wake of the January 6 insurrection, but quickly backed off from calling for his resignation because of fears of retribution from the Republican party………

    Steve Scalise​

    Steve Scalise

    BEFOREUS congressman
    NOWHouse majority leader

    The highest-ranking Republican to sign onto a supreme court lawsuit challenging the election results. Scalise was unanimously elected to serve as the No 2 ranking Republican in the House in 2023, a position that allows him to help set the party's agenda.

    Scalise was the highest-ranking Republican to sign onto a US supreme court amicus brief trying to get electoral votes from key swing states rejected. He was also one of the 147 Republicans to vote against certifying the 2020 election results.

    In November, he was easily re-elected to a ninth term to represent his Louisiana district in Congress. He was unanimously elected House majority leader last year, making him the No 2 ranking Republican in the US House……

    State legislators

    Jake Hoffman​

    Jake Hoffman

    BEFOREArizona state representative
    NOWArizona state senator

    After serving as one of Arizona's fake electors, Hoffman was elected to the Arizona state senate in 2022, where he chairs two key committees.

    Hoffman signed onto a fake slate of electors that falsely claimed Donald Trump won Arizona in 2020 and sent a letter to Mike Pence on 5 January 2021, asking the then vice-president to delay certifying the state’s election results.

    He previously worked for Turning Point USA, a group with strong ties to the state GOP, and was permanently suspended from Twitter over his firm’s work for Turning Point…….

     
    From the party that likes to call everybody a pedophile...

     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom