When extreme politics overtakes science (1 Viewer)

< Previous | Next >
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #1

TheRealTruth

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 12, 2019
Messages
107
Reaction score
71
Location
Florida
Offline
I used to consider myself fairly staunchly left but things like this make me feel as if I am on the right side of moderate.

Nature, a lauded and well known science journal printed a paper in an October release: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5

This month, a correspondence was posted in the same journal, being critical of the use of the word supremacy in the original article. Claiming the word supremacy was both violent and had a racist overtone
: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03781-0

Is this really where we are in our political discourse? People in the scientific community complaining about nomenclature so they can appear to be woke?
 

Dadsdream

1% Tanzanian DNA
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
1,255
Reaction score
904
Age
63
Location
Hancock
Offline
Political correctness run amok. Geez. :jpshakehead:

JOKE: Next up - Electrical connectors will no longer be referred to as "male" or "female," while Underwriters Labs forms an LGBTQ inclusive committee to select new terminology. :winkthumb:

1576453906118.png
 

Intensesaint

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 29, 2019
Messages
473
Reaction score
328
Location
Florida
Offline
Political correctness run amok. Geez. :jpshakehead:

JOKE: Next up - Electrical connectors will no longer be referred to as "male" or "female," while Underwriters Labs forms an LGBTQ inclusive committee to select new terminology. :winkthumb:

1576453906118.png
The sad thing is.. I can see this happening in time.
 

SystemShock

Uh yu ka t'ann
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
684
Reaction score
481
Location
Xibalba
Offline
I used to consider myself fairly staunchly left but things like this make me feel as if I am on the right side of moderate.

Nature, a lauded and well known science journal printed a paper in an October release: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5

This month, a correspondence was posted in the same journal, being critical of the use of the word supremacy in the original article. Claiming the word supremacy was both violent and had a racist overtone
: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-03781-0

Is this really where we are in our political discourse? People in the scientific community complaining about nomenclature so they can appear to be woke?
Let's not get carried away. It's only 13 people. They don't come even remotely close to holding a candle to climate change deniers or evolution deniers, and denying science over politics/religion, which has been happening for centuries, is exponentially (if not infinitely) worse that nitpicking which words to use to define something.
 

MT15

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2019
Messages
2,744
Reaction score
4,112
Location
Midwest
Online
I mean, you can get more than 13 people to sign off on all sorts of crazy ideas. I’m more intrigued by how this letter to the editor gets magnified to the point that it becomes part of the national conversation. Which gives it far more oxygen than it should have, IMO.
 

samiam5211

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
1,110
Reaction score
1,342
Age
42
Location
Earth
Offline
I think stuff like this is silly, and no one should be giving it much attention on either side of it.

"Political Correctness" goes both ways really. It's not really about conservative/liberal.

If Target workers say "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas", and a christian gets upset, then they aren't really any different from a non religious person getting upset over being told "Merry Christmas" v/s "Happy Holidays".

You can't say people shouldn't get so upset over which words we choose, then get upset when they choose to use something other than your preferred word.

It goes both ways.
 

GMRfellowtraveller

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 28, 2019
Messages
800
Reaction score
901
Age
53
Location
new orleans
Offline
and more broadly language isn't science
as science gets more precise, language adapts to it
when scientists were able to observe molecules then atoms then quarks (well theorized about quarks), language adapted and accommodated to develop terms for those observations
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

< Previous | Next >

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Fact Checkers News Feed

General News Feed

Top Bottom