Trump’s assault on Universities (5 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    MT15

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Mar 13, 2019
    Messages
    33,032
    Reaction score
    49,962
    Location
    Midwest
    Offline
    I thought we had a thread just about Trump’s illegal attacks on American universities, especially some of our very best. Harvard has decided to fight back, while Yale and Columbia have basically rolled over. Trump had been using the excuse of rooting out anti-semitism, which MAGA actually cares nothing about, but it at least provided a paper-thin veneer of a reason. The latest letter sent to Harvard, announcing they will no longer receive any federal grants, discards that excuse. An Atlantic article about this letter:

    “The intensely hostile letter that Education Secretary Linda McMahon sent to the leadership of Harvard yesterday has a lot going on. But the most notable thing about it is what it leaves out.

    To hear McMahon tell it, Harvard is a university on the verge of ruin. (I say McMahon because her signature is at the bottom of the letter, but portions of the document are written in such a distinctive idiolect—“Why is there so much HATE?” the letter asks; it signs off with “Thank you for your attention to this matter!”—that one detects the spirit of a certain uncredited co-author.) She accuses it of admitting students who are contemptuous of America, chastises it for hiring the former blue-city mayors Bill de Blasio and Lori Lightfoot to teach leadership (“like hiring the captain of the Titanic to teach navigation”), questions the necessity of its remedial-math program (“Why is it, we ask, that Harvard has to teach simple and basic mathematics?”), and accuses its board chair, Penny Pritzker (“a Democrat operative”), of driving the university to financial ruin, among many other complaints. The upshot is that Harvard should not bother to apply for any new federal funding, because, McMahon declares, “today’s letter marks the end of new grants for the University.”

    What you will not find in the McMahon letter is any mention of the original justification for the Trump administration’s ongoing assault on elite universities: anti-Semitism. As a legal pretext for trying to financially hobble the Ivy League, anti-Semitism had some strategic merit. Many students and faculty justifiably feel that these schools failed to take harassment of Jews seriously enough during the protests that erupted after the October 7, 2023, terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas. By centering its critique on that issue, the administration was cannily appropriating for its own ends one of the progressive left’s highest priorities: protecting a minority from hostile acts.

    Now, however, the mask is off. Aside from one oblique reference to congressional hearings about anti-Semitism (“the great work of Congresswoman Elise Stefanik”), the letter is silent on the subject. The administration is no longer pretending that it is standing up for Jewish students. The project has been revealed for what it is: an effort to punish liberal institutions for the crime of being liberal.”

    It simply amazes me that this letter was actually sent. It seems to suggest a First Amendment violation is being committed by the Trump Administration. I am so sick of these morons.
     
    Last edited:
    small conservative revolution has swept the humanities at some US colleges and universities. Its vanguard are new programs, called centers or institutes, that have begun cropping up at schools in recent years. Often funded by outside donors or earmarks from state governments, the programs tend to bear names featuring words such as “civic”, “freedom” or “classical”.

    These centers do credible teaching and research, and are usually not explicitly political. But their goal, to counter what conservatives see as hegemonically leftwing teaching, arguably is.

    Their rise has created a peculiar irony: just as the economic utility of the humanities is being questioned, and academic departments are guttedon budgetary or ideological grounds, some schools have found money for heady, old-fashioned curricula emphasizing the “great books” of western civilization and the literature of what used to be called the western canon.

    While students arriving at some universities this fall may have thought ancient Greek to be dead and French lit struggling for survival, students at these new centers are discussing the philosophical ideas of the ancient world, Christian thought, the Enlightenment, the founding of the American republic, and reading the literature of William Shakespeare and John Milton……..

    As the Trump administration attempts to bend major universities to its will, and many Republican politicians accuse higher education of being a hotbed of leftwing ideological indoctrination, schools are feeling pressure to demonstrate that their faculty and curricula are hospitable to conservatives.

    William Inboden, a conservative academic and the executive vice-president of the University of Texas at Austin, argued in a recent essay that the American people have lost trust in US higher education, in part because of “a sense that American universities as institutions have deviated from, or even turned against, the fundamental values of the nation and what was once quaintly known as ‘the American way of life’”.

    University administrators and state governments have embraced these centers as an end-run strategy, said Massimo Faggioli, a professor of theology at Trinity College Dublin who until recently taught in the US. Academic departments tend to resist outside reforms, Faggioli said, and freestanding “centers” are a way for university administrations to add conservative-coded spaces to their schools while avoiding messy confrontations with existing departments……..

     
    ………I have no judgment to pass on Abaraonye’s messages. But log on to any social media site during a major tragic event and you’ll see that laughing at inappropriate jokes is part of the furniture.

    The Titan submersible, Luigi Mangione’s alleged killing of the CEO of UnitedHealthcare, Prince Philip dying and indeed Charlie Kirk. Five years on, I still see memes and jokes by rightwing provocateurs making a mockery of George Floyd’s death.

    Whatever your assessment of the rights and wrongs of people laughing at tragedy, a question remains: if this is such a regular fixture of online life, then why was Abaraonye singled out?

    It’s an easy answer.

    We are abnormally and unethically obsessed with what students get up to at university, and any action is immediately defined as being within the public interest even where it is broadly inconsequential.

    This is especially the case with Oxbridge students, with those institutions seen as finishing schools for entry into UK elite life. Abaraonye had the unfortunate timing of having volunteered himself for a position there that came with a title, meaning he wasn’t just an obscure student but someone with some importance.

    He also has long dreadlocks, wears grey tracksuit bottoms to union debates and didn’t get straight As in his A-levels, an almost too-good-to-be-true apparition of what sticklers for decorum or fogey alumni would consider as driving the corruption of a storied institution.

    What followed the news of Abaraonye’s comments exposes two issues: the hypocrisy of the right’s panic over campus “free speech”, and the dog-eat-dog environment that has been engineered by the media’s intrusion into university spaces.

    Universities are meant to be spaces where students come, thinking they have one of the world’s greatest minds, and thrash out ideas, make provocative statements and forge political convictions, which they may well ditch once they nab a Goldman Sachs graduate role.

    It’s also a space where they will make mistakes. This is the reality of campus free speech. But presented with the opportunity to discredit and stamp out someone confident and progressively minded who might become a future force in, say, politics, law or journalism, the media seem to want to crack the egg before it hatches……….

     
    i just relized something

    what if donnie j trump is attacking all the universitys as payback for those who attacked trump university
     
    Affirmative action strikes again as a lawsuit from a legal organization resulted in a scholarship for Black students being dumped at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), all by citing legislation put in place to protect African-Americans, Inside Higher Ed reported.

    Pacific Legal Foundation, known for filing lawsuits to end affirmative action in public education, targeted a scholarship for Black students, Black Alumni Scholarship Fund (BASF), at the university by using the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, passed to protect African Americans, in an effort to halt the financial aid program geared towards helping only Black students.

    The conservative group was victorious, as the scholarship was renamed the Goins Alumni Scholarship Fund (GASF) in honor of scholarship founder Lennon Goins. It is also open to students of all demographics, with the website — rebranded from basf-sandiego.com to gasf-sandiego.com — stating that applications will be sent to any students who identify “on the UC application as Black or African American.”

    Pacific Legal celebrated the win, praising the KKK Act for coming in handy.

    “I think that the lawsuit fulfilled the promise of what the law was intended to do,” an attorney in the firm’s equality and opportunity practice group, Jack Brown, said. A spokesperson from the Foundation said it is “pleased that this lawsuit was amicably resolved” while being “committed to complying with all federal and state anti-discrimination laws.”

    The law was signed by President Ulysses S. Grant to protect the 14th Amendment after the white supremacist group launched “one of the worst campaigns of domestic terrorism in American history” in South Carolina. After the Civil War ended in 1865, several states modified the 14th Amendment to include freed slaves. It states that states can’t “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” or deny anyone “the equal protection of the laws.”

    In response, klansmen targeted Black people and white Republicans, including rape and murder, in an effort to reconstruct the government. That same legislation is now being used against the demographic it was created to protect.

    In collaboration with the Californians for Equal Rights Foundation (CFER), one of its members — a white transfer student —became a plaintiff in Pacific Legal’s case. CFER argued that several “Asian-American high school members who plan to apply to UCSD” could be excluded if it is geared toward Black students only. “I think the law was intended to kind of fulfill the promise of the Declaration of Independence, that all Americans are created equal,” Brown said.

    “That’s true whether you’re white, whether you’re Black, whether you’re Asian or what have you.”

    According to The College Fix, legal experts labeled the organization’s victory as “a novel legal strategy that could be used to challenge similar programs.”

    The successful scholarship program lasted 42 years, awarding more than $1 million to over 400 black UCSD students pursuing degrees in engineering, math, science, and technology...................


     
    WASHINGTON (AP) — Cornell University has agreed to pay $60 million and accept the Trump administration’s interpretation of civil rights laws in order to restore federal funding and end investigations into the Ivy League school.

    Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff announced the agreement on Friday, saying it upholds the university’s academic freedom while restoring more than $250 million in research funding that the government withheld amid investigations into alleged civil rights violations.

    The university agreed to pay $30 million directly to the U.S. government along with another $30 million toward research that will support U.S. farmers.

    Kotlikoff said the agreement revives the campus’ partnership with the federal government “while affirming the university’s commitment to the principles of academic freedom, independence, and institutional autonomy that, from our founding, have been integral to our excellence.”…………


     
    WASHINGTON (AP) — Cornell University has agreed to pay $60 million and accept the Trump administration’s interpretation of civil rights laws in order to restore federal funding and end investigations into the Ivy League school.

    Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff announced the agreement on Friday, saying it upholds the university’s academic freedom while restoring more than $250 million in research funding that the government withheld amid investigations into alleged civil rights violations.

    The university agreed to pay $30 million directly to the U.S. government along with another $30 million toward research that will support U.S. farmers.

    Kotlikoff said the agreement revives the campus’ partnership with the federal government “while affirming the university’s commitment to the principles of academic freedom, independence, and institutional autonomy that, from our founding, have been integral to our excellence.”…………


    Paying a bribe and then saying it upholds your academic freedom would have Orwell laughing his azz off.
     
    WASHINGTON (AP) — Cornell University has agreed to pay $60 million and accept the Trump administration’s interpretation of civil rights laws in order to restore federal funding and end investigations into the Ivy League school.

    Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff announced the agreement on Friday, saying it upholds the university’s academic freedom while restoring more than $250 million in research funding that the government withheld amid investigations into alleged civil rights violations.

    The university agreed to pay $30 million directly to the U.S. government along with another $30 million toward research that will support U.S. farmers.

    Kotlikoff said the agreement revives the campus’ partnership with the federal government “while affirming the university’s commitment to the principles of academic freedom, independence, and institutional autonomy that, from our founding, have been integral to our excellence.”…………



    well at least all of the hbcus in usa will never do that and turn into the most biggest heels in the history of usa

    even thought in the eyes and ears of the trump right wingers aka in the shoes of trumplicans the hbcus are like the biggest heels in the right wingers verison of usa history
     
    WASHINGTON (AP) — Cornell University has agreed to pay $60 million and accept the Trump administration’s interpretation of civil rights laws in order to restore federal funding and end investigations into the Ivy League school.
    So the idiots pay the extortion and now will never get out from under it. Good job, kiss your rep goodbye. sounds like they failed to understand trump economics 101. Give to Trump, your balls are woned.
     
    At colleges across Texas last month, a series of viral campus videos, abrupt professor firings, confusing teaching restrictions and sudden course audits came in such rapid-fire succession that before the fallout was over at one public university, another scandal was upending norms at a school hundreds of miles away.

    Many students and professors say the ground has shifted on speech and scholarship, creating confusion about what they can say, study and teach in the very places they once saw as centers of open inquiry.

    But that changed atmosphere didn’t happen overnight. Texas Republicans have been building toward it for years.

    Long before the Trump administration began targeting institutions of higher learning, Texas officials passed laws, threatened universities with funding cuts and waged social media warfare aimed at combating what they described as a pervasive bias against conservative opinions.

    The pressure prompted regents at systems across the state to install top school administrators more aligned with state leaders. No hire illustrates that more than the Texas Tech University System choosing Brandon Creighton, a former Republican senator who wrote many of the laws now transforming higher education, to become chancellor later this year.

    “As a leading Carnegie R1 research institution, our mission is to educate the next generation of doctors, lawyers, engineers, entrepreneurs, teachers, and innovators — not to engage in ideological or political battles,” Creighton said in a statement to The Texas Tribune on Tuesday.

    He said higher education has “too often drifted from its core purpose, allowing activism and ideology to overshadow academics and innovation.”

    When a Texas A&M University student over the summer filmed a professor defending the legality of discussing gender identity beyond sex assigned at birth, the chain of events that followed only accelerated the political transformation of higher education already underway in the state.

    The professor was fired. Texas A&M President Mark A. Welsh III, beloved by students but a target of conservative alumni, resigned. The Texas Tech University System issued vague restrictions on classroom discussions about transgender and nonbinary people. Universities and community colleges across the state began reviewing their academic offerings.

    In a separate incident stemming from a video amplified by conservative social media accounts, a tenured Texas State professor was fired over comments he made about anarchists at a socialist conference.

    Meanwhile, the assassination of national conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah college galvanized conservative youth across Texas and the country. Separate videos of a Texas Tech student and another at Texas State University mocking Kirk’s death drew immediate ire. Conservative Texas officials, including Gov. Greg Abbott, demanded punishment. Both universities said the students were no longer enrolled shortly after the videos surfaced. The Tech student also faces a misdemeanor charge of simple assault, presumably for striking the cap of a Kirk supporter.

    Some students and faculty now second-guess what they can say in and out of class. Students who aren’t white, straight and cisgender say their identities are being erased. Many professors worry that fear, not inquiry, is starting to define campus life.

    “This doesn’t only apply to faculty who are teaching LGBTQ content,” said Lauren Gutterman, an associate professor of American Studies and Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. “A colleague was even nervous about teaching the suffrage movement. I know someone else who was worried about teaching Shakespeare because so many characters in Shakespearean plays play around with or switch gender.”.............

     
    At colleges across Texas last month, a series of viral campus videos, abrupt professor firings, confusing teaching restrictions and sudden course audits came in such rapid-fire succession that before the fallout was over at one public university, another scandal was upending norms at a school hundreds of miles away.

    Many students and professors say the ground has shifted on speech and scholarship, creating confusion about what they can say, study and teach in the very places they once saw as centers of open inquiry.

    But that changed atmosphere didn’t happen overnight. Texas Republicans have been building toward it for years.

    Long before the Trump administration began targeting institutions of higher learning, Texas officials passed laws, threatened universities with funding cuts and waged social media warfare aimed at combating what they described as a pervasive bias against conservative opinions.

    The pressure prompted regents at systems across the state to install top school administrators more aligned with state leaders. No hire illustrates that more than the Texas Tech University System choosing Brandon Creighton, a former Republican senator who wrote many of the laws now transforming higher education, to become chancellor later this year.

    “As a leading Carnegie R1 research institution, our mission is to educate the next generation of doctors, lawyers, engineers, entrepreneurs, teachers, and innovators — not to engage in ideological or political battles,” Creighton said in a statement to The Texas Tribune on Tuesday.

    He said higher education has “too often drifted from its core purpose, allowing activism and ideology to overshadow academics and innovation.”

    When a Texas A&M University student over the summer filmed a professor defending the legality of discussing gender identity beyond sex assigned at birth, the chain of events that followed only accelerated the political transformation of higher education already underway in the state.

    The professor was fired. Texas A&M President Mark A. Welsh III, beloved by students but a target of conservative alumni, resigned. The Texas Tech University System issued vague restrictions on classroom discussions about transgender and nonbinary people. Universities and community colleges across the state began reviewing their academic offerings.

    In a separate incident stemming from a video amplified by conservative social media accounts, a tenured Texas State professor was fired over comments he made about anarchists at a socialist conference.

    Meanwhile, the assassination of national conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah college galvanized conservative youth across Texas and the country. Separate videos of a Texas Tech student and another at Texas State University mocking Kirk’s death drew immediate ire. Conservative Texas officials, including Gov. Greg Abbott, demanded punishment. Both universities said the students were no longer enrolled shortly after the videos surfaced. The Tech student also faces a misdemeanor charge of simple assault, presumably for striking the cap of a Kirk supporter.

    Some students and faculty now second-guess what they can say in and out of class. Students who aren’t white, straight and cisgender say their identities are being erased. Many professors worry that fear, not inquiry, is starting to define campus life.

    “This doesn’t only apply to faculty who are teaching LGBTQ content,” said Lauren Gutterman, an associate professor of American Studies and Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. “A colleague was even nervous about teaching the suffrage movement. I know someone else who was worried about teaching Shakespeare because so many characters in Shakespearean plays play around with or switch gender.”.............


    why does it feel like that donnie j trump is buying the red states universitys and having more right wingers taking over
     
    At colleges across Texas last month, a series of viral campus videos, abrupt professor firings, confusing teaching restrictions and sudden course audits came in such rapid-fire succession that before the fallout was over at one public university, another scandal was upending norms at a school hundreds of miles away.

    Many students and professors say the ground has shifted on speech and scholarship, creating confusion about what they can say, study and teach in the very places they once saw as centers of open inquiry.

    But that changed atmosphere didn’t happen overnight. Texas Republicans have been building toward it for years.

    Long before the Trump administration began targeting institutions of higher learning, Texas officials passed laws, threatened universities with funding cuts and waged social media warfare aimed at combating what they described as a pervasive bias against conservative opinions.

    The pressure prompted regents at systems across the state to install top school administrators more aligned with state leaders. No hire illustrates that more than the Texas Tech University System choosing Brandon Creighton, a former Republican senator who wrote many of the laws now transforming higher education, to become chancellor later this year.

    “As a leading Carnegie R1 research institution, our mission is to educate the next generation of doctors, lawyers, engineers, entrepreneurs, teachers, and innovators — not to engage in ideological or political battles,” Creighton said in a statement to The Texas Tribune on Tuesday.

    He said higher education has “too often drifted from its core purpose, allowing activism and ideology to overshadow academics and innovation.”

    When a Texas A&M University student over the summer filmed a professor defending the legality of discussing gender identity beyond sex assigned at birth, the chain of events that followed only accelerated the political transformation of higher education already underway in the state.

    The professor was fired. Texas A&M President Mark A. Welsh III, beloved by students but a target of conservative alumni, resigned. The Texas Tech University System issued vague restrictions on classroom discussions about transgender and nonbinary people. Universities and community colleges across the state began reviewing their academic offerings.

    In a separate incident stemming from a video amplified by conservative social media accounts, a tenured Texas State professor was fired over comments he made about anarchists at a socialist conference.

    Meanwhile, the assassination of national conservative activist Charlie Kirk at a Utah college galvanized conservative youth across Texas and the country. Separate videos of a Texas Tech student and another at Texas State University mocking Kirk’s death drew immediate ire. Conservative Texas officials, including Gov. Greg Abbott, demanded punishment. Both universities said the students were no longer enrolled shortly after the videos surfaced. The Tech student also faces a misdemeanor charge of simple assault, presumably for striking the cap of a Kirk supporter.

    Some students and faculty now second-guess what they can say in and out of class. Students who aren’t white, straight and cisgender say their identities are being erased. Many professors worry that fear, not inquiry, is starting to define campus life.

    “This doesn’t only apply to faculty who are teaching LGBTQ content,” said Lauren Gutterman, an associate professor of American Studies and Women’s, Gender and Sexuality Studies at the University of Texas at Austin. “A colleague was even nervous about teaching the suffrage movement. I know someone else who was worried about teaching Shakespeare because so many characters in Shakespearean plays play around with or switch gender.”.............

    All complete bullschlitz. They most certainly want ideology and activism. They want conservative ideology and activism
     
    All complete bullschlitz. They most certainly want ideology and activism. They want conservative ideology and activism
    It's not really conservative ideology. It's fascist, straight, cis, christian, white male supremacy ideology.
     
    True. There is no longer a conservative belief structure such as exemplified by Eisenhower Republicans. They want Radicalized Reactionary ideology and activism.

    in my opinion its all thanks to the king of right wing media rush limball in the 1980s when he started that style on his radio show

    but it wasnt until 2016 when donnie j trump made that style more and more common its crazy
     
    Trump now wants to offer 600k visas to Chinese students. The peak was 372k Chinese students in 2019, so this would be a huge increase. All the while the state department has revoked 80k student visas. I wonder what the ethnicity of those 80k were?


    His reason is to purportedly assure that our universities don't go out of business, yet the big ugly bill cut 4000 research grants to colleges.


    He also claimed it was needed for our historically black colleges, but I wasn't aware that many Chinese students went to HBCs. He claims that foreigners pay twice as much as US students. I think it is true that they pay more, so I don't mind letting in Chinese students, but this is excessive, and it seems like it will result in more US students being denied. I wouldn't mind if he wasn't simultaneously undermining colleges.
     
    Trump now wants to offer 600k visas to Chinese students. The peak was 372k Chinese students in 2019, so this would be a huge increase. All the while the state department has revoked 80k student visas. I wonder what the ethnicity of those 80k were?


    His reason is to purportedly assure that our universities don't go out of business, yet the big ugly bill cut 4000 research grants to colleges.


    He also claimed it was needed for our historically black colleges, but I wasn't aware that many Chinese students went to HBCs. He claims that foreigners pay twice as much as US students. I think it is true that they pay more, so I don't mind letting in Chinese students, but this is excessive, and it seems like it will result in more US students being denied. I wouldn't mind if he wasn't simultaneously undermining colleges.
    There is no plan. No plan beyond chaos and grifting.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom