Miscellaneous Trump (13 Viewers)

[Huntn]

Anxiety surges as Donald Trump may be indicted soon: Why 2024 is 'the final battle' and 'the big one'​

Anxiety surges as Donald Trump may be indicted soon: Why 2024 is 'the final battle' and 'the big one'

Donald Trump's many legal problems – and calls for protests – have generated new fears of political violence and anxiety about the 2024 election.

www.yahoo.com

WASHINGTON – It looks like American politics is entering a new age of anxiety, triggered by an unprecedented legal development: The potential indictment of a former president and current presidential candidate.

Donald Trump's many legal problems – and calls for protests by his followers – have generated new fears of political violence and anxiety about the unknowable impact all this will have on the already-tense 2024 presidential election

I’ll reframe this is a more accurate way, Are Presidents above the law? This new age was spurred into existence when home grown dummies elected a corrupt, mentally ill, anti-democratic, would be dictator as President and don’t bother to hold him responsible for his crimes, don’t want to because in the ensuing mayhem and destruction, they think they will be better off. The man is actually advocating violence (not the first time). And btw, screw democracy too. If this feeling spreads, we are In deep shirt.

This goes beyond one treasonous Peice of work and out to all his minions. This is on you or should we be sympathetic to the idea of they can’t help being selfish suckers to the Nation’s detriment? Donald Trump is the single largest individual threat to our democracy and it‘s all going to boil down to will the majority of the GOP return to his embrace and start slinging his excrement to support him?

 

[fooferdoggie]

Trump has a better understanding of the Bible than the Pope, says Fox News guest

Megachurch pastor calls Pope Leo ‘sincerely wrong’ about Iran war

www.independent.co.uk

II guess he learned it from osmosis the one time he held the Bible. Even Trump has said he never read the Bible. These idiots give their souls away like it is candy to children. Not that a lot of them should be around children, though.

 

[zztop]

There is a literal commandment against this.

Apparently this statue was funded by a crypto scheme:

The 22-foot structure reportedly cost $450,000 and was funded by a group of crypto investors, who commissioned the Trump likeness as part of a promotional campaign for their memecoin, $PATRIOT.

 

[zztop]

II guess he learned it from osmosis the one time he held the Bible. Even Trump has said he never read the Bible. These idiots give their souls away like it is candy to children. Not that a lot of them should be around children, though.

Never forget he treargassed protestors to have a photo op with a bible.

 

[Optimus Prime]

 

[Optimus Prime]

In Donald Trump’s first term, my Brooklyn-based activist group had the peculiar dynamic of being started by two men while being composed of about 65% women.

Since November 2024, our group has doubled in size, and the gender imbalance has tipped even further: we are now about 80% women.

Almost 18 months into Trump’s second term, it is abundantly clear that the appetite for anti-Trump, pro-democracy activism has not dimmed at all.

And yet, there is a substantial portion of the populace that, in my experience as an activist, seems to have lost its fervor for the fight.

If I see two other men’s faces at one of my group’s events, it feels like we’ve had a pretty good masculine turnout. Bigger events like the No Kings rallies feature more men, but nearly everywhere we go under Trump 2.0, there is a notable paucity of men.

“When we look at the demographics of Resistance 2.0 there is overwhelming consistency,” writes Dana R Fisher, who studies civic engagement at American University. “Participants are predominantly white, highly-educated, female, and middle-aged.”

During Trump’s first term, things were similar: Laura Putnam and Theda Skocpol reported that women comprised “70% of the participants and most members of the leadership teams”. There is also a well-documented gender gap in Trump support.

So where did all the men go, and how can we get them on board?………

How do we get more men to join the anti-Trump resistance? | Saul Austerlitz

My activist group is about 80% women. Where did all the men go – and how can we get them back?

www.theguardian.com

 

[Optimus Prime]

President Donald Trump has lashed out at two U.S. Supreme Court justices that he himself nominated to the bench, complaining that they have not “remained true” to him by reliably ruling in his favor.

Dwelling on the prospect of the highest court voting against his executive order ending the principle of birthright citizenship, the president took to Truth Social late Sunday to attack Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett over their decision to block his reciprocal tariffs program in February.

“I ‘Love’ Justice Neil Gorsuch!” Trump wrote. “He’s a really smart and good man, but he voted against me, and our Country, on Tariffs, a devastating move. How do I reconcile this? So bad, and hurtful to our Country. I have, likewise, always liked and respected Amy Coney Barrett, but the same thing with her.

“They were appointed by me, and yet have hurt our Country so badly! I do not believe they meant to do so, but their decision on Tariffs cost the United States 159 Billion Dollars that we have to pay back to enemies, and people, companies, and Countries, that have been ripping us off for years. It’s hardly believable!”

The president suggested a solution the justices could have made when handing down their 6-3 ruling against him three months ago: “They could have solved that situation with a ‘tiny’ sentence, ‘Any money paid by others to the United States does not have to be paid back.’ Why wouldn’t they have done so?”

Taking a self-pitying turn, Trump continued: “I’m working so hard to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and then people that I appointed have shown so little respect to our Country, and its people. What is the reason for this? They have to do the right thing, but it’s really OK for them to be loyal to the person that appointed them to ‘almost’ the highest position in the land, that is, a Justice of the United States Supreme Court.……..

Trump rants about Supreme Court justices who have not ‘remained true’ to him

President Donald Trump accuses conservative judges Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett of disloyalty for ruling against him, suggesting they only do so to demonstrate their independence

www.independent.co.uk

 

[efil4]

Remember the hub bub all over the Trump T1 phone?

Well folks that put down $100 (590,000 of them ) got an email.
No phone coming and oh updated "terms"...no refund of deposit.

Ehhhhlll. Ohhhhh. Elllllllll

 

[faceman]

President Donald Trump has lashed out at two U.S. Supreme Court justices that he himself nominated to the bench, complaining that they have not “remained true” to him by reliably ruling in his favor.

Dwelling on the prospect of the highest court voting against his executive order ending the principle of birthright citizenship, the president took to Truth Social late Sunday to attack Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett over their decision to block his reciprocal tariffs program in February.

“I ‘Love’ Justice Neil Gorsuch!” Trump wrote. “He’s a really smart and good man, but he voted against me, and our Country, on Tariffs, a devastating move. How do I reconcile this? So bad, and hurtful to our Country. I have, likewise, always liked and respected Amy Coney Barrett, but the same thing with her.

“They were appointed by me, and yet have hurt our Country so badly! I do not believe they meant to do so, but their decision on Tariffs cost the United States 159 Billion Dollars that we have to pay back to enemies, and people, companies, and Countries, that have been ripping us off for years. It’s hardly believable!”

The president suggested a solution the justices could have made when handing down their 6-3 ruling against him three months ago: “They could have solved that situation with a ‘tiny’ sentence, ‘Any money paid by others to the United States does not have to be paid back.’ Why wouldn’t they have done so?”

Taking a self-pitying turn, Trump continued: “I’m working so hard to, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and then people that I appointed have shown so little respect to our Country, and its people. What is the reason for this? They have to do the right thing, but it’s really OK for them to be loyal to the person that appointed them to ‘almost’ the highest position in the land, that is, a Justice of the United States Supreme Court.……..

Trump rants about Supreme Court justices who have not ‘remained true’ to him

President Donald Trump accuses conservative judges Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett of disloyalty for ruling against him, suggesting they only do so to demonstrate their independence

www.independent.co.uk

My 6 year old granddaughter has a better understanding about tariffs than Trump ever will.

 

[fooferdoggie]

President Donald Trump has lashed out at two U.S. Supreme Court justices that he himself nominated to the bench, complaining that they have not “remained true” to him by reliably ruling in his favor.

and yet the SC claims they are not political

 

[fooferdoggie]

Remember the hub bub all over the Trump T1 phone?

Well folks that put down $100 (590,000 of them ) got an email.
No phone coming and oh updated "terms"...no refund of deposit.

Ehhhhlll. Ohhhhh. Elllllllll

This is Trump showing how Christian he is. Take from the poor, give to the rich.

 

[superchuck500]

 

[efil4]

We are stuck in his brain loop that keeps returning to his "greatest hits"

 

[efil4]

 

[efil4]

 

[efil4]

OK i know what is happening now. Trump conflating "PLAN" with "GOAL"



holy sheet we in trouble...

 

[efil4]

Brain is gone.