MELANIA, the film, exclusively in theaters worldwide on January 30th, 2026

Users who are viewing this thread

    I'm half convinced she is a plant for the Russsian govt and has been working for decades to make him into a huge patsy for them - why else would she continue to put up with his womanizing, assaults against other women, and multiple affairs etc.
    Because she makes a lot of money off of him? she has spoken out she married him for his money. or maybe both.
     
    1000043171.jpg
     
    This seems like a fair take: stepping back and considering her life's arc, a film about Melania could have merit. But a film about the two weeks of her preparing for a second inauguration is entirely uninteresting, politics notwithstanding.

    1769803930513.png



     
    This seems like a fair take: stepping back and considering her life's arc, a film about Melania could have merit. But a film about the two weeks of her preparing for a second inauguration is entirely uninteresting, politics notwithstanding.

    1769803930513.png



    The only Melania movie that would be worthwhile is one that isn't authorized, written, produced, or edited by Melania or anyone else who supports the Republicans or the Trump family.
     

    Screenwriting and documentary making 101 is don't include scenes with people just getting into a car, getting out of car, driving a car, driving up in a car, or driving away in a car. The same applies to any mode of transportation. People traveling is boring and a waste of story telling time if all the scene does is show someone while they are traveling.
     
    Last edited:
    This all just sounds to me like:

    Amazon person 1: how can we stay on his good side?
    Amazon person 2: lets fluff his ego by spending some (for our company) pocket change we found in the couch

    It paid $40 million to buy this film. (and as NPR put it)
    That price makes Melania arguably the most expensive infomercial in history. It also makes it inconceivable that the film will return a profit — it's only expected to take in a paltry $5 million dollars worldwide this weekend. That's prompted speculation in Hollywood circles about what else Amazon thinks it bought when it purchased the film.
     
    This all just sounds to me like:

    Amazon person 1: how can we stay on his good side?
    Amazon person 2: lets fluff his ego by spending some (for our company) pocket change we found in the couch

    It paid $40 million to buy this film. (and as NPR put it)
    That price makes Melania arguably the most expensive infomercial in history. It also makes it inconceivable that the film will return a profit — it's only expected to take in a paltry $5 million dollars worldwide this weekend. That's prompted speculation in Hollywood circles about what else Amazon thinks it bought when it purchased the film.
    Easy answer? Access to contracts.
     
    This all just sounds to me like:

    Amazon person 1: how can we stay on his good side?
    Amazon person 2: lets fluff his ego by spending some (for our company) pocket change we found in the couch

    It paid $40 million to buy this film. (and as NPR put it)
    That price makes Melania arguably the most expensive infomercial in history. It also makes it inconceivable that the film will return a profit — it's only expected to take in a paltry $5 million dollars worldwide this weekend. That's prompted speculation in Hollywood circles about what else Amazon thinks it bought when it purchased the film.

    The $40M included a $28M personal licensing fee paid directly to Melania herself. For context, Margot Robbie was paid $12.5M to be Barbie, and Scarlett Johansson earns between $10M and $20M per film.

    So you have a movie expected to earn a fraction of what Amazon paid for it, and they paid Melania an astronomical fee for a movie that was already made (in other words, she didn't need to be incentivized to make it).

    It's nothing more than a transfer of wealth from Amazon to Melania Trump for no rational reason except to ingratiate Bezos and Amazon with Trump. It sounds like Amazon corporate paid for it, I'd love to see a stockholder derivative suit against the company for it - there's no way they could defend it.

    1769874504748.png


     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom