Media Literacy and Fake News (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Ayo

    Spirit Grocer
    Joined
    Sep 28, 2019
    Messages
    896
    Reaction score
    2,328
    Location
    Toronto
    Offline
    The Canadian Journalism Federation is taking fake news very seriously. I've worked with media literacy for years, and this is - to date - the most expansively public approach that I've seen, in advance of the Federal Election.


    If you are engaged online, you have likely been subjected to something that was not true, and yet there isn't much pursuit in trying to determine factual accuracy of the articles and information. And most of us - probably every single one of us here - have fallen for it.

    Recent polling by Ipsos, Earnscliffe Strategy Group and MIT researchers suggests nearly all Canadians have come across misinformation online, yet only 40 per cent feel they know how to differentiate between fake news and the real thing.

    The polls also found 90 per cent of Canadians admitted to falling for fake news in the past, and only a third of them regularly check to see if the stories they’re consuming are legitimate.

    I don't think that their approach is going to be enough. I think the most effective utility it will have is bringing awareness. But fuller approaches to media literacy are going to be necessary to combat the deluge of increasingly deceptive media. These are hard skills that can be learned, but with the advent of new 'deep fake' technology, media literacy is going to have adapt, too.

    I would like to see greater emphasis on media literacy in the US. Because even though this statement is for the Canadian audience, it definitely - maybe even more so - applies to the US where news is more infotainment and sensationalized than it is up here:
    “To be an engaged citizen, you have to have access to quality journalism… you have to understand what is quality journalism and what is not,” said Richard Gingras, vice-president of Google News.

    Another source includes one approach - the SPOT approach: https://www.manitoulin.ca/news-media-canada-launches-new-tool-to-help-people-spot-fake-news/

    SPOT is an acronym that acts as a simple way to remember the four principles of identifying misinformation. It works like this:
    S: Is this a credible source? Check the source of the article—and be skeptical.
    P: Is the perspective biased? Think critically and look for varying viewpoints on an issue.
    O: Are other sources reporting the same story? Be your own fact-checker and verify the validity of the story.
    T: Is the story timely? Check the date the story was published—sometimes, stories use old information to take advantage of a timely occurrence.

    It's obviously not enough, but a decent start.
     
    Yeesh, what's next? People looting target and CNN calls it shoppers getting great discounts at Target.

    There is another one that was on twitter on a guy from MSNBC standing in front of a burning building as he was saying "it's a peaceful protest". This was from a few weeks ago.
     
    Was this a meme or was it something CNN actually did?

    CNN-Headline-Fiery-2.jpg


    Well how exactly is that untrue?

    Do you think all protesting started fires? Half? Or say like just a few?

    So what would you say is the cut off point where mostly would not be accurate?
     


    No man so you are saying all protesting started fires or over fifty percent!

    If not than that I'd exactly accurate!

    I am not saying all white 17 year old males will shoot you with an long gun because they are afraid am I because that would be the same thing
     
    Rand-Paul-Attacked-BLM-750x394.jpg


    CNN: Rand Paul and his wife enjoying a mostly lovely walk on a nice night in Washington DC.
     
    Well considering an armed minor asshat from the other side of the argument mowed people down the next day are you certain the fires were started by protesting people?

    Do you see your failed logic?

    Do you see that the way fox news spoon feeds you hate is not the same as other networks?
     
    I am just excited you guys are actually admitting there have been riots. For the last 3 months, we have been told they are protests and there was not violence at all and we were all 'crazy' and racist for saying so.

    And no, protesters don't set fires. Rioters and Looters set fires and vandalize private property.

    Either protesters are rioters or they are not the same. You cant pick and choose as the narrative evolves.
     
    I am just excited you guys are actually admitting there have been riots. For the last 3 months, we have been told they are protests and there was not violence at all and we were all 'crazy' and racist for saying so.

    And no, protesters don't set fires. Rioters and Looters set fires and vandalize private property.

    Either protesters are rioters or they are not the same. You cant pick and choose as the narrative evolves.
    I never said riot.

    Maybe you can explain the armed children.
     
    I never said riot.

    Maybe you can explain the armed children.
    I know you didn't. Neither has CNN but with the polling going a different than the Dems thought on cities being burned, I would imagine you will be saying riots in about a week, once the media are forced to actually cover them.

    Children? He was 17. The Dems want 16 year old to vote, correct?
    Besides, his activities were mostly peaceful I would think. At least 50% of time there he was not firing his weapon in self defense.
     
    I know you didn't. Neither has CNN but with the polling going a different than the Dems thought on cities being burned, I would imagine you will be saying riots in about a week, once the media are forced to actually cover them.

    Children? He was 17. The Dems want 16 year old to vote, correct?
    Besides, his activities were mostly peaceful I would think. At least 50% of time there he was not firing his weapon in self defense.

    Would you call after the Rodney King verdict a riot?

    Then lf you do then please explain how what is going on right now is the same.

    It is not even remotely the same.
     
    I know you didn't. Neither has CNN but with the polling going a different than the Dems thought on cities being burned, I would imagine you will be saying riots in about a week, once the media are forced to actually cover them.

    Children? He was 17. The Dems want 16 year old to vote, correct?
    Besides, his activities were mostly peaceful I would think. At least 50% of time there he was not firing his weapon in self defense.

    Voting doesn't kill people - he DID - twice!
     
    I've seen videos of mattresses on fire in the middle of a street. I don't get the point, but I also don't think it's necessarily a riot.
     
    I've seen videos of mattresses on fire in the middle of a street. I don't get the point, but I also don't think it's necessarily a riot.

    Buildings and businesses set on fire are done by rioters. And I believe the mattress video you might be talking about were those protesters that set a homeless man's mattress ablaze, for what reason I do not know.

     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom