zztop
Well-known member
Offline
I think it is time to have a dedicated topic about it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The corrupt Republican judges didn't wipe it from existence, but they made it entirely unenforceable.It still exists.
You're such a...The voting rights act is designed to stop segmenting natural minority districts like the one in Memphis. if they try to chop that district up they’ll find out real quick that the voting rights act is still in effect.

Wise words here.


Tennessee Republicans redraw maps to erase last Democratic, Black-majority district
Move comes days after supreme court ruling weakened Voting Rights Act protections against racial gerrymanderingwww.theguardian.com
There will be a lawsuit filed in MS. State auditor Shad Whie publicly said we are going to eliminate Benny Thompson'sThe reaction speed of southern states to the US supreme court’s decision last week in Louisiana v Callais has been breathtaking for voting rights activists.
One week after Callais, Louisiana’s governor has ordered the state’s ongoing congressional election to be set aside while state lawmakers redraw maps to eliminate a Democratic-majority – that is, a Black-majority – seat covering Baton Rouge.
Alabama’s Republican-majority legislature is drafting legislation in a special session that will allow it to set aside the results of a completedprimary later this year if courts lift an injunction on its redistricting.
Florida was amid a special redistricting session as the ruling was handed down, passing a congressional map for 28 districts that packs Black and brown voters into four districts on the south Florida coast and Orlando, eliminating every other Democratic majority.
Mississippi will convene two weeks from now in a Confederate-era capitol building that it hasn’t used in 100 years, ostensibly to eliminate the Democratic majority in the one Mississippi district held by a Black representative.
South Carolina’s Republican majority in the statehouse voted Wednesday to extend its legislative calendar, allowing time to consider whether they should eliminate the state’s sole Democratic-majority, Black-majority district, held by long-serving representative James Clyburn.
And activists watched Tennessee lawmakers vote Thursday morning to eliminate its one remaining Democratic district around Memphis, a city of about 610,000 people, about two-thirds of whom are Black.
Donald Trump’s demand to tear up political norms has been met by Republican states eager to dust off a segregation-era playbook that maximizes the political power of white voters.
“What’s happening right now is probably the swiftest disenfranchisement of Black folks since Reconstruction, due to disenfranchisement by racist gerrymandering. And they will lie and say that it’s for political purposes,” said Democratic state representative Justin Pearson of Tennessee, a Memphis legislator running for a congressional district blown into pieces by Republican lawmakers.
“They cracked it into three. The district stretches hundreds of miles … it’s completely diluted in thirds almost to the percentage. It’s surgical, how they remove the possibility of Black participation.”……..
‘This is not democracy’: voting rights activists shocked by speed of US states moving to stifle Black voters
Alabama, Mississippi, Tennessee and other southern states stun residents with all-out charge to redraw congressional maps to favor white voters after supreme court rulingwww.theguardian.com

The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved Democratic congressional redistricting plan, delivering another major setback to the party in a nationwide battle against Republicans for an edge in this year’s midterm elections.
The court ruled that the state’s Democratic-led legislature violated procedural requirements when it placed the constitutional amendment on the ballot to authorize the mid-decade redistricting. Voters narrowly approved the amendment April 21, but the court’s ruling renders the results of that vote meaningless.
“This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void,” the court said in its opinion.
Democrats had hoped to win as many as four additional U.S. House seats under Virginia’s redrawn U.S. House map as part of an attempt to offset Republican redistricting done elsewhere at the urging of President Donald Trump.
That ruling, combined with a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision severely weakening the Voting Rights Act, has supercharged the Republicans’ congressional gerrymandering advantage heading into this year’s midterm elections.
Legislative voting districts typically are redrawn once a decade after each census to account for population changes. But Trump started an unusual flurry of mid-decade redistricting last year when he encouraged Republican officials in Texas to redraw districts in a bid to win several additional U.S. House seats and hold on to their party’s narrow majority in the midterm elections……..,
Virginia Supreme Court strikes down Democrats' redrawn US House maps, giving Republicans a win
The Virginia Supreme Court has struck down a Democratic congressional redistricting plan that had won voter approval.apnews.com
Technically the redistricting can still happen, it just won't happen until 2028. The ruling was on HOW they went about doing it, not the gerrymandering itself. All the Democrats have to do is follow the proper procedures and the new gerrymandering can still be put into place.
So in Ohio, the GOP just ignored a state Supreme Court ruling that their maps were invalid and they just used them anyway. Is there any appetite in VA for this sort of response?Also, I think it's really important for people to understand the ruling in Virginia b/c the Republicans like to hide behind the idea that this was some crazy push by Democrats that broke all the rules.
The Constitution of Virginia states that to change the Constitution of Virginia, the General Assembly must vote on a Constitutional Amendment twice before it goes to a referendum, and that the second time the Assembly votes, it must be after an election between the two votes. So what happened here? In October 2025 the Virginia General Assembly voted to change the Constitution to allow redistricting. In November 2025, Virginia had an election. Then the General Assembly voted again in favor of the change in January. And then in April the people of Virginia approved this change.
So what was the challenge? After all there were 2 votes by the Assembly, and there was an election between those two votes. Right? Well, the complaint and the 4-3 ruling, decided that since early voting had already started when the first Assembly vote took place that it didn't really count b/c the election had already started.
So, to make some claim that this was something rammed down the throats of Virginians without them having proper time to consider the implications is plainly ridiculous. The idea that Virginia voters did not have enough time to consider the merits of redistricting when they were voting in November 2025 and again in April 2026 is just dumb.
Don’t excuse this shirt. It’s reprehensible.To be fair, the district that is being "changed" had a white man represent it for the last 20 years, and the republican candidate that is most likely to now win is a black woman.