Epstein and Trump (3 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

MT15

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2019
Messages
27,310
Reaction score
40,063
Location
Midwest
Offline
I figured we may as well have a separate thread. I’m thinking this story should be looked at with more scrutiny.

Here is an affidavit from a person who witnessed Trump having sex with a 13 yo girl at Epstein’s NY home. Her identity was sealed from the public. These women and girls who came forward were receiving credible death threats as I understand it.

IMG_1343.jpeg
 
Senator Wyden has sent a letter spelling out some pretty big money transfers involving Epstein that he says are linked to child sex trafficking and were not investigated by the DOJ when Epstein was charged during Trump’s first term. He says the Treasury Department has the files.

“I am convinced that the DOJ ignored evidence found in the U.S. Treasury Department’s Epstein file, a binder that contains extensive details on the mountains of cash Epstein received from prominent businessmen that Epstein used to finance his criminal network,” Wyden writes in the letter.

The Treasury Department has this information because that’s where banks file suspicious activity reports, or SARS. Wyden’s letter says his staff has documented that Epstein-related filings by banks contain “information on more than 4,725 wire transfers involving Epstein’s accounts, all of which merit further investigation.”

For instance, Wyden suggests that DOJ prosecutors and FBI agents should “immediately investigate the evidence contained in the Treasury Department records on Epstein.” Wyden’s investigators know of these records because his office has been examining Epstein’s financial transactions for several years. In February 2024—when Democrats controlled the Senate—Wyden’s staff viewed in camera (that is, privately) thousands of pages of Treasury files documenting those transactions.

That review brought to Wyden’s attention the $1.5 billion in suspicious transactions flagged to Treasury by big banks, which is detailed in the Times report. Wyden’s letter fleshes out these revelations, noting starkly that Treasury’s “Epstein file contains significant information on the sources of funding behind Epstein’s sex trafficking activities.”

That appears to mean Wyden’s investigators saw evidence in those SARS that a large chunk of the money that passed through Epstein’s network was related to that sex trafficking. As the letter notes:

Epstein clearly had access to enormous financing to operate his sex trafficking network, and the details on how he got the cash to pay for it are sitting in a Treasury Department filing cabinet.

To be fair, it’s unclear whether DOJ has or has not examined these Treasury files; it’s possible it has done so. But Wyden’s office notes that at minimum, DOJ has a responsibility to say whether it has done this and, if so, what this review unearthed. DOJ has not replied to Wyden’s questions in this regard, his office says.”

The letter lays out other lines of inquiry he says the DOJ should be following.

Oh and Wyden has been accused of only bringing this up now for political reasons. False.

“In that regard, Wyden’s office also offers another revelation. In the Times piece, a Treasury spokesperson dismissed Wyden’s demand for release of these documents, insisting that when Joe Biden was president, Wyden “never asked” for this information, exposing the demand as “political theater.”

But Wyden’s office says this is false. The in-camera review by Wyden staffers of Treasury documents in February 2024 itself shows that Wyden sought this info from the Biden administration—and that he got access to it.

What’s more, a Wyden aide tells me that in 2024, soon after Wyden’s staff viewed these Treasury documents in camera, Wyden actively moved to get the Senate to subpoena their release. Because Finance Committee rules require bipartisan support for subpoenas, Wyden sought the backing of several GOP senators on the committee, including now-chairman Mike Crapo and Marsha Blackburn. But none would support a subpoena, the aide says.”

 
The news agencies will not let this story go, because sex scandals make them too much money.

Chandra Levy went missing in May of 2001. When news agencies found out there were rumors she was having an affair with Congressman Gary Condit, they kept the story front and center every day.

They did that for 5 months until the attacks on Sept 11, 2001. A few months after that, the news agencies started carrying the story again with rumors about the affair with Gary Condit and speculations about what happened to her. The story finally was dropped after her remains were found in May of 2022.

The worst foreign terrorist attack only temporarily distracted news agencies from the sex-murder scandal. They kept it going for a year. Epstein is a sex-murder or suicide scandal. They aren't going to drop it anytime soon and the harder Trump tries to make it go away, the worse he looks and the more it keeps the story going.

It couldn't be happening to a more appropriate person.
 
The news agencies will not let this story go, because sex scandals make them too much money.

Chandra Levy went missing in May of 2001. When news agencies found out there were rumors she was having an affair with Congressman Gary Condit, they kept the story front and center every day.

They did that for 5 months until the attacks on Sept 11, 2001. A few months after that, the news agencies started carrying the story again with rumors about the affair with Gary Condit and speculations about what happened to her. The story finally was dropped after her remains were found in May of 2022.

The worst foreign terrorist attack only temporarily distracted news agencies from the sex-murder scandal. They kept it going for a year. Epstein is a sex-murder or suicide scandal. They aren't going to drop it anytime soon and the harder Trump tries to make it go away, the worse he looks and the more it keeps the story going.

It couldn't be happening to a more appropriate person.
100% right

Gary Condit was wall to wall 24-7 coverage until 9-11

The news was also full of teasing fake outs

‘Have the police found the clue that will allow them to crack the Chandra Levy case? Tune in at 11’

At 11: ‘No, they haven’t’
 

At this point I would be shocked if Trump / DOJ doesn’t either pardon her or work out an early release in exchange for her “testimony”. Problem is she’s as big a liar as Trump and she will say anything to get out of a 20 year prison sentence.

What I don’t know is if MAGA will see through this painfully obvious corrupt charade or if someone else has seen the files Trump is so scared of and will release them.

I would hate to see Maxwell released. But I would like to see Trump exposed for something that MAGA cannot hand wave away.
 
The news agencies will not let this story go, because sex scandals make them too much money.

Chandra Levy went missing in May of 2001. When news agencies found out there were rumors she was having an affair with Congressman Gary Condit, they kept the story front and center every day.

They did that for 5 months until the attacks on Sept 11, 2001. A few months after that, the news agencies started carrying the story again with rumors about the affair with Gary Condit and speculations about what happened to her. The story finally was dropped after her remains were found in May of 2022.

The worst foreign terrorist attack only temporarily distracted news agencies from the sex-murder scandal. They kept it going for a year. Epstein is a sex-murder or suicide scandal. They aren't going to drop it anytime soon and the harder Trump tries to make it go away, the worse he looks and the more it keeps the story going.

It couldn't be happening to a more appropriate person.
This is gonna cost the republicans 2026 AND 2028.
Even though he’s not running, 2028 will be still be Trump focused.
People are gonna vote against the Republicans because of Trump. And Epstein will be a major part of this.
 
100% right

Gary Condit was wall to wall 24-7 coverage until 9-11

The news was also full of teasing fake outs

‘Have the police found the clue that will allow them to crack the Chandra Levy case? Tune in at 11’

At 11: ‘No, they haven’t’


Bahaha...it's like the ancient aliens guy.

"Could it be that thousands of years ago these 'sky gods' came down from the heavens and taught ancient man to build fire?"

No...no, it couldn't be, but it got me to tune in for 2 seasons before I realized they were totally full of crap.
 
" I dont do drawings"

then says " sometimes they would say would you draw a building "

LOL


Even though there are examples of his drawings, all he had to do was say he doesn’t do drawings. But his guilt won’t let him stop at that. He has to blather more to try to cover his awareness of guilt.
 
This is gonna cost the republicans 2026 AND 2028.
Even though he’s not running, 2028 will be still be Trump focused.
People are gonna vote against the Republicans because of Trump. And Epstein will be a major part of this.
Were I not paranoid I would agree. Once Maxwell gets her pardon agreement on paper and then says nothing about Trump this will go away particularly for his base and a certain percentage of independents.
 
Trump never feels guilt and is incapable of feeling it.
I get that. I think it has to do with both his inability to shut up and a nagging feeling that his image is in danger. Guilt in the usual sense with normal people is missing in him but his ego fragility plays that role.
 

Create an account or login to comment

You must be a member in order to leave a comment

Create account

Create an account on our community. It's easy!

Log in

Already have an account? Log in here.

General News Feed

Fact Checkers News Feed

Back
Top Bottom