Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet Cruz and Hawley are still fine with it, still trying to minimize it.I don't buy into this. Obviously the GOP is trying to reap the whirlwind by pandering to the nutjobs but the wealthy don't benefit from anarchy. Had the mob broke into the Senate chamber on January 6th they would have killed Cruz and Hawley because 99% of those rubes probably have no idea who is who in terms of Republican and Democrat.
It was someone else. I can assure you he never said that.We have members here who are ready to rip it all up. I think you may have expressed that sentiment yourself - my apologies if it was someone else. But I can think of 3 right off the top of my head.
The wealthy and powerful view Q-nuts as useful idiots more than anything else.I don't buy into this. Obviously the GOP is trying to reap the whirlwind by pandering to the nutjobs but the wealthy don't benefit from anarchy. Had the mob broke into the Senate chamber on January 6th they would have killed Cruz and Hawley because 99% of those rubes probably have no idea who is who in terms of Republican and Democrat.
But would they? Mutually deescalating out of necessity would be the generally reasonable thing to do, but it's not the only way that scenario could go. One party could compromise, but not the other. One party could have taken itself to such an extreme position in terms of demonisation of its opposition that compromise isn't even on the table any more (e.g. if a party routinely cast its opposition and their nominations as agents of evil, that doesn't exactly position them to start saying, "Actually, they're alright."). Then you'd be looking at the scenario resolving itself in other ways (from 2/3 rule going, to entire system collapsing).But that's under a framework where they know they might eventually retake the White House and be able to appoint with a vote of 50+VP. If it's 2/3rds then the Democrats would simply do the same thing to a Republican President and there would literally be no more judicial replacements. Eventually things would deescalate out of necessity.
I don't buy into this. Obviously the GOP is trying to reap the whirlwind by pandering to the nutjobs but the wealthy don't benefit from anarchy. Had the mob broke into the Senate chamber on January 6th they would have killed Cruz and Hawley because 99% of those rubes probably have no idea who is who in terms of Republican and Democrat.
I went and looked, it was a different member who wants to “rip it all up”. So I was wrong about that. Saul said he was ambivalent about whether this country was worth saving.It was someone else. I can assure you he never said that.
Yeah, well, I get the sentiment. I mean, I've already stated that if Trump gets elected president again, I'm done and will move to Korea. No joke.I went and looked, it was a different member who wants to “rip it all up”. So I was wrong about that. Saul said he was ambivalent about whether this country was worth saving.
The wealthy and powerful view Q-nuts as useful idiots more than anything else.
So MJG this morning alluded to Judge Jackson as a pedophile. Tonight, Tom Cotton goes with Nazi.
So MJG this morning alluded to Judge Jackson as a pedophile. Tonight, Tom Cotton goes with Nazi.
Certifiably."The last Judge Jackson left the Supreme Court to go to Nuremberg and prosecute the case against the Nazis. This Judge Jackson might have gone there to defend them."
These people are nuts.
I know this is a joke, and it made me smile, but there have been serious inroads into the Republican Party made by Putin in the last 20 years. It’s a bit concerning that our R politicians and media don’t mind parroting Putin talking points.Tom Cotton is Putin, who knew?
I don't think it's in mainstream Republican thought, but there's definitely a real percentage of them doing that. It's weird though, other than Trump and his idiot lemmings, most Republicans actually hate Putin and want him out of the picture. There are a number of Republican Congressional reps supporting sending Ukraine more weapons and aid. Then you have idiot Rand Paul with his own strange agenda basically trying to slow everything down.I know this is a joke, and it made me smile, but there have been serious inroads into the Republican Party made by Putin in the last 20 years. It’s a bit concerning that our R politicians and media don’t mind parroting Putin talking points.
I'm definitely not in favor of tearing down the government but I don't see how we can return to any degree of normalcy. My ambivalence mostly comes from the fact that I fully intend to emigrate once I'm ready to retire. If I had a more fungible career/skill-set I probably wouldn't wait. I've never been much of a 'patriot' in the sense that I think America is infallible or for whatever reason has a monopoly on freedom/civil rights. No shortage of countries in the world where the societies are just as free, if not freer than the U.S. It's a big world out there with a lot of interesting places.I went and looked, it was a different member who wants to “rip it all up”. So I was wrong about that. Saul said he was ambivalent about whether this country was worth saving.