Trump Indictment ( includes NY AG and Fed documents case ) (4 Viewers)

Thread Attachment browser

Users who are viewing this thread

    Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
    SteveSBrickNJ

    SteveSBrickNJ

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Jan 7, 2022
    Messages
    1,736
    Reaction score
    835
    Age
    62
    Location
    New Jersey
    Offline
    Former President D. Trump has been indicted by a New York Grand Jury. There will be much to talk about on this topic because this is just the first step in a lengthy process.
    Possibly it is worthy of its own thread here rather than posting about Trump's indictment in already existing threads? :unsure:
    *
    This 3/31/23 story might get the ball rolling....
    *
    www.yahoo.com

    Manhattan’s DA wanted a Friday Trump arrest. Trump’s team said no.

    Secret Service needed more time to prepare, according to the ex-president’s legal team.
    www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com
     
    Sendai said:
    Roberts and Barrett

    They favor letting the natural appeals process occur.

    I agree.
    Click to expand...

    Yeah I omitted ACB, thx


    Catturd isn’t happy with her 😆


    1736478035766.png
     
    DJ1BigTymer said:
    I would have preferred a suspended sentence with the same amount of years that the last person convicted of similar crimes received.


    edit: and of course we all should prepare for him to claim exoneration because the Judge "tossed out" his conviction.
    Click to expand...

    Yeah - but the opposite is true. Having a sentence (of any kind) means the conviction is permanent unless overturned. It really doesn’t matter but the funny thing is that we know it matters to Trump.
     
    superchuck500 said:
    Yeah - but the opposite is true. Having a sentence (of any kind) means the conviction is permanent unless overturned. It really doesn’t matter but the funny thing is that we know it matters to Trump.
    Click to expand...
    Would it not matter in those states and countries that has laws limiting the actions of a convicted fellon?
     
    Sendai said:
    Roberts and Barrett

    They favor letting the natural appeals process occur.

    I agree.
    Click to expand...
    I read an article a few months ago that said Barrett may become the new Anthony Kennedy. Both sides will need her
    vote. Kennedy as we know was the swing vote for many years
     
    superchuck500 said:
    Yeah - but the opposite is true. Having a sentence (of any kind) means the conviction is permanent unless overturned. It really doesn’t matter but the funny thing is that we know it matters to Trump.
    Click to expand...
    I get that, but that's never gonna stop trump, elected R's and state media from repeating that trump was exonerated.
     
    superchuck500 said:
    Yeah - but the opposite is true. Having a sentence (of any kind) means the conviction is permanent unless overturned. It really doesn’t matter but the funny thing is that we know it matters to Trump.
    Click to expand...

    SFL was holding out that this wouldn't happen, and Trump wouldn't go down as the first convicted felon president.

    It matters.
     
    Dragon said:
    Would it not matter in those states and countries that has laws limiting the actions of a convicted fellon?
    Click to expand...

    I don’t think there are many limitations - and to the extent that state law regulates felons, Trump’s official tasks as president would not be impacted because the federal supremacy clause overrides those state laws. But I can’t really think of an example.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Register

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    Share this page

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom