- Banned
- #1
SaintForLife
Well-known member
Offline
Trump is alive, but his ear was bleeding
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
trash would be offended to be compared to her..Least surprising thing ever. She's pure trash.
I'm going to disagree somewhat with your framing. I think it's reasonable to believe Trump was a specific target - i.e., he wasn't simply "shooting into a crowd." Of course, the chances of your bullets hitting people in the crowd, especially if you miss, is extremely high and at least 3 people were victims of that. But it appears to me, rather clearly, to be an assassination attempt. Now his motivation? I don't have an opinion on that at this point.
That is why I call her Margrine Trailer Grease.trash would be offended to be compared to her..
I call her Empty G (garbage)That is why I call her Margrine Trailer Grease.
So this is another indication it was police responsibility for that area where the shooter was. I hadn’t considered how tied the local and/or state police’s hands are in PA. It’s open carry. He could walk down the street openly carrying that rifle and they cannot do anything about it outside the venue perimeter.
So this is another indication it was police responsibility for that area where the shooter was. I hadn’t considered how tied the local and/or state police’s hands are in PA. It’s open carry. He could walk down the street openly carrying that rifle and they cannot do anything about it outside the venue perimeter.
Okay, I just read an explanation for the shoes thing. I knew that Trump’s first reaction when the SS got to him was that they had to retrieve his shoes before he left the stage. His shoes? I thought how weird and random is that? Even before he thought to strike his dramatic pose and tell the crowd to “fight, fight, fight”. Then I read this:
I'm going to disagree somewhat with your framing. I think it's reasonable to believe Trump was a specific target - i.e., he wasn't simply "shooting into a crowd." Of course, the chances of your bullets hitting people in the crowd, especially if you miss, is extremely high and at least 3 people were victims of that. But it appears to me, rather clearly, to be an assassination attempt. Now his motivation? I don't have an opinion on that at this point.
Special Operations Sniper:
Not unless it's Joe Biden / Kamala Harris - 2024 who's saying it, then it would be OK alrightly with me.Sure, there are parallels, but anyone (speaking generally) comparing Trump to Hitler probably isn’t someone you want to take political direction from.
I understand that when there are failures, we look to the chief executive of the organization for accountability (a concept Trump routinely rebuffed when president) but the head of the Secret Service wasn't calling the shots at this event. This idea that is being floated that the head of the Secret Service is directly responsible for failures at the event is silly - unless there's some evidence that there were specific operational conditions imposed by the front office that led to it.
The people that are a rushing to blame a woman (and "DEI") because a 20-year old man legally possessed a long-range military rifle and was able to shoot Donald Trump aren't making any sense - she wasn't there. She didn't play a role in the operational security plan. Trump, Biden, and others under USSS protection have these kinds of events - the director isn't involved in operational details.
Not to mention that trump's detail is likely filled with trump's handpicked sycophants and augmented by his private goon squad.The people that are a rushing to blame a woman (and "DEI") because a 20-year old man legally possessed a long-range military rifle and was able to shoot Donald Trump aren't making any sense - she wasn't there. She didn't play a role in the operational security plan. Trump, Biden, and others under USSS protection have these kinds of events - the director isn't involved in operational details.