All things Racist...USA edition (4 Viewers)

[Farb]

I was looking for a place to put this so we could discuss but didn't really find a place that worked so I created this thread so we can all place articles, experiences, videos and examples of racism in the USA.

This is one that happened this week. The lady even called and filed a complaint on the officer. This officer also chose to wear the body cam (apparently, LA doesn't require this yet). This exchange wasn't necessarily racist IMO until she started with the "mexican racist...you will never be white, like you want" garbage. That is when it turned racist IMO

All the murderer and other insults, I think are just a by product of CRT and ACAB rhetoric that is very common on the radical left and sadly is being brought to mainstream in this country.

Another point that I think is worth mentioning is she is a teacher and the sense of entitlement she feels is mind blowing.

https://news.yahoo.com/black-teacher-berates-latino-la-221235341.html

 

[MT15]

What are some laws that favor whites over non-whites?

Are you saying that whites have equal representation under Diversity and Inclusion?

I know that the NHL wants to get more inclusive; do you think the NBA should do the same?

I'm more interested in consistency. Do you think Diversity and Inclusion is giving white conservative Christians equal treatment?

Would it be best to say that CRT and diversity are "to educate white people"?

This is just invalid trolling, IMO. I already showed you how drug laws favor whites over non-whites. But you could look all this up yourself.

The next time you make a valid point on here will be the first. I don’t think there’s much point conversing with you any further since you aren’t capable of having a forthright conversation.

I actually have better things to do with my time. you’re not a serious person.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

Sure I can; I've already done it, as you're the one who foolishly tried to lead my argument.

See, the key is to respect boundaries. You do that and everything will be juuust fine.

I give respect by default. When someone demonstrates that they don't deserve it, I stop giving it. And you should really reign in this kind of condescending crap.

At least we agree on something.

Something about a broken clock.

It belongs with law makers and law enforcement. Let them root out the problems and stamp them out.

How can you honestly determine where and with whom it belongs when you have already demonstrated that you don't know what it entails or how to recognize it?

Systemic non-white racism? Interesting. I haven't thought about it, but perhaps it may exist at some level.

What are you talking about?

 

[Peace]

I give respect by default.

You self aggrandize by default. It's a common problem amongst leftists.

Something about a broken clock.

Biden? Is that you?

How can you honestly determine where and with whom it belongs when you have already demonstrated that you don't know what it entails or how to recognize it?

That's why I've come to you, the supposed experts, for clarification. The problem is, none of you seem to know what it entails either. But I'll keep digging until you all runaway or we figure it out together.

What are you talking about?

I'm wondering if something like systemic black racism exists anywhere - like within organizations or communities where they're predominantly black. It's something worth exploring.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

You self aggrandize by default. It's a common problem amongst leftists.

I don't think you know what that means, unless you think people that have informed opinions (and therefore the ability to point out your uninformed opinions) are self-aggrandizing.

Biden? Is that you?

No, he's busy fixing what the last guy broke.

That's why I've come to you, the supposed experts, for clarification. The problem is, none of you seem to know what it entails either. But I'll keep digging until you all runaway or we figure it out together.

Except... multiple people have either provided or agreed with a provided definition. I and others have also pointed out where a lot of what the right claims to be CRT is not related in any way. You have demonstrated that you don't know what you're talking about, that your information comes from sources like Christopher Rufo (the guy who brags about perferting CRT to encompass shirt he doesn't like) and that you have little interest in actually learning.

I'm wondering if something like systemic black racism exists anywhere - like within organizations or communities where they're predominantly black. It's something worth exploring.

Why is it worth exploring?

 

[Peace]

This is just invalid trolling, IMO. I already showed you how drug laws favor whites over non-whites. But you could look all this up yourself.

No it isn't. it's an attempt to get you people to think.

Now, you gave me something on drug laws. Fine, drug laws favor whites over non-whites - I can take your word for it until I verify it for myself. But do you think stuff like this should be talked about in public schools? If you do, why?

 

[MT15]

No it isn't. it's an attempt to get you people to think.

Now, you gave me something on drug laws. Fine, drug laws favor whites over non-whites - I can take your word for it until I verify it for myself. But do you think stuff like this should be talked about in public schools? If you do, why?

I have made myself clear. It can and should be talked about in high school level courses. If only to make people who will be voting soon aware of the bias as it currently exists. It shouldn’t be dwelled upon, IMO, as there is a lot to cover for these types of classes. But neither should the legislature try to regulate what teachers can and cannot cover. That’s for schools to decide along with input from parents and school boards. Do you favor our state legislatures getting into the business of regulating classroom speech? Or any speech, for that matter?

How is inferring a crazy notion that the NBA discriminates against white people making anyone think? How is mistaking an effort by the NHL to attract minority fans and grow their fan base as an effort to discriminate against white people making anyone think?

When you post stuff like that, I have to say you’re not a serious poster.

 

[Peace]

I have made myself clear. It can and should be talked about in high school level courses. If only to make people who will be voting soon aware of the bias as it currently exists.

Nope. You bring in racially charged shirt like CRT, then you have to bring everything in. If systemic racism must be talked about then so should the leftist agenda; Marxist Globalism, all of it.

That’s for schools to decide along with input from parents and school boards. Do you favor our state legislatures getting into the business of regulating classroom speech? Or any speech, for that matter?

Schools need to stick with the basics. Math, English, History anything business related... its all good stuff.

How is inferring a crazy notion that the NBA discriminates against white people making anyone think? How is mistaking an effort by the NHL to attract minority fans and grow their fan base as an effort to discriminate against white people making anyone think?

Do you think more white players would like to play in the NBA? I do. If you do too, then why do you think they can't?

The NHL isn't trying to attract minorities to increase their fanbase. They're trying to toe the political line. Here, check this out:

NHL announces initiatives to combat racism, accelerate inclusion efforts | NHL.com

Will work with NHLPA, teams to adopt additional measures

www.nhl.com

When you post stuff like that, I have to say you’re not a serious poster.

I'm not a serious poster to leftists because somehow your side has gotten way too much control over speech. I'm here to help change that.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

Nope. You bring in racially charged shirt like CRT, then you have to bring everything in. If systemic racism must be talked about then so should the leftist agenda; Marxist Globalism, all of it.

CRT is not "racially-charged." It's an academic study of race, period. As for the rest, you need to define Marxist Globalism and then demonstrate how it's an agenda subscribe to by "the left". Otherwise, it's just word salad nonsense.

Schools need to stick with the basics. Math, English, History anything business related... its all good stuff.

Civics is a foundational topic. It is most definitely part of the basic courses that should be mandatory in high school.

Do you think more white players would like to play in the NBA? I do. If you do too, then why do you think they can't?

There's no systemic issue preventing white people from playing in the NBA. I think we can agree that professional sports teams want to be able to choose from a pool of the best players possible, right?

The NHL isn't trying to attract minorities to increase their fanbase. They're trying to toe the political line. Here, check this out:

NHL announces initiatives to combat racism, accelerate inclusion efforts | NHL.com

Will work with NHLPA, teams to adopt additional measures

www.nhl.com

Do you think opposing racism and supporting equality is a political stance?

I'm not a serious poster to leftists because somehow your side has gotten way too much control over speech. I'm here to help change that.

You're not a serious poster because you've shown no willingness to actually engage. You say a bunch of stuff, people push back with pertinent questions and/or fact-based rebuttals, and you just keep on spouting crap.

 

[Optimus Prime]

 

[Saintamaniac]

as you have said that being a racist the worst thing a person/human can be.

Quote me where I said that. You're lying again. I'm not surprised.

The difference between you and I is that I support teaching history how it actually happened. You can't teach the assassination of Lincoln as Lincoln was assassinated. You have to teach who assassinated him, why he was assassinated and what was the result of him being assassinated. You support teaching history as a fairy tale. I bet you are one of those people that cry about participation trophies when actually, your "fight" against teaching actual history is, in affect, supporting participation trophies because you want history taught in a manner that avoids the evils of history so that no one (read white people) don't have to feel bad about what their ancestors did. Isn't that why participation trophies exist; so no one has to feel bad about not winning? But it's par for the course from that crowd. Cry, wail and accuse everyone else of the very things that you are doing yourself.

 

[Optimus Prime]

A group launched by longtime Donald Trump aide Stephen Miller has been quietly running radio ads warning white voters that the Biden administration is pursuing a host of policies designed to hurt them because of their race.

A recording of the ad, obtained by POLITICO, represents one of the most openly race-based spots of the cycle, amplifying tropes that have historically been used to generate backlash to minority groups.

“When did racism against white people become OK?” the ad begins. “Joe Biden put white people last in line for Covid relief funds. Kamala Harris said disaster aid should go to non-white citizens first. Liberal politicians block access to medicine based on skin color. Progressive corporations, airlines, universities all openly discriminate against white Americans. Racism is always wrong. The left’s anti-white bigotry must stop. We are all entitled to equal treatment under the law.”

The spot ends with the disclosure that it is paid for by America First Legal, the organization that was founded by Miller after the Trump administration ended, along with former Trump administration officials like Mark Meadows, Matt Whitaker, and Russ Vought...........

Stephen Miller group’s radio ads accuses Biden of ‘racism’ towards white Americans

The ad, a recording of which was obtained by POLITICO, is running in Georgia.

www.politico.com

https://politico-audio-feed.simplecast.com/episodes/america-first-legal-ad

 

[Optimus Prime]

 

[samiam5211]

Maybe his costume is "Trump supporter"

 

[Farb]

Congratulations, I guess? I don't care about parents' excitement levels for what they are told is CRT.

You should if you want your team to win an election.

 

[Farb]

Quote me where I said that. You're lying again. I'm not surprised.

The difference between you and I is that I support teaching history how it actually happened. You can't teach the assassination of Lincoln as Lincoln was assassinated. You have to teach who assassinated him, why he was assassinated and what was the result of him being assassinated. You support teaching history as a fairy tale. I bet you are one of those people that cry about participation trophies when actually, your "fight" against teaching actual history is, in affect, supporting participation trophies because you want history taught in a manner that avoids the evils of history so that no one (read white people) don't have to feel bad about what their ancestors did. Isn't that why participation trophies exist; so no one has to feel bad about not winning? But it's par for the course from that crowd. Cry, wail and accuse everyone else of the very things that you are doing yourself.

Yeah, you did and no I am not going to go dig it up.

Sure. Doesn't change the way your described 'teaching history' in your last point sounded more like revenge teaching and it is, you just said the quite part out loud, got called and and now crawfishing by telling me what I am offended and upset about.

 

[Farb]

People are that soft now that certain costumes are just 'too much' for Halloween but we can call anyone we disagree with the name of the costume? What if he is a Ukrainian nazi battalion member? Wouldn't all the war mongers libs be buying him drinks and starting a go fund me?

 

[samiam5211]

You should if you want your team to win an election.

This is the only thing that matters to some people.

 

[cuddlemonkey]

You should if you want your team to win an election.

It's not a team sport, it's the future of this country. Blindly supporting your party as a team is the problem.