Trafficking Victim Blasts Britt For Twisting Her Story (1 Viewer)

[LovesMusic7360]

It turns out that the woman the senator lied about is now speaking out and she's ticked off at the senator.

That's on top of the senator being wrong and lying about what happened.

1. The senator didn't meet one on one with the rape survivor.

2. She wasn't trafficked by a drug cartel.

3.She was never trafficked in the USA

4. She was trafficked in 2004 to 2008. When the bush boy was president.

5. She is accusing the senator of exploiting her story for political purposes.

Apparently she sees this the same way I do. I said the senator was exploiting her for political purposes too.

She is very upset with the senator for lying about her and exploiting her.

That senator has no sense of decency.

There is no low too low for republicans these days.

WOW! Sex Trafficking victim Karla Jacinto has some very harsh words for Republican Senator Katie Britt.Britt, who used Jacinto’s story in the GOP response to the State of the Union Address, not only seems to have gotten facts wrong, but she also didn’t ask Jacinto permission to use her story.FACTS:- Jacinto was not trafficked by the drug cartels. She was trafficked by a Pimp.- Jacinto was Trafficked in Mexico — never in the United States.- The events took place under President George W. Bush.Jacinto told CNN:“I hardly ever cooperate with politicians, because it seems to me that they only want an image. They only want a photo — and that to me is not fair… I work as a spokesperson for many victims who have no voice, and I really would like them to be empathetic: all the governors, all the senators, to be empathetic with the issue of human trafficking because there are millions of girls and boys who disappear all the time. People who are really trafficked and abused, as she [Britt] mentioned. And I think she [Britt] should first take into account what really happens before telling a story of that magnitude”Is Britt going to apologize for using Jacinto as a political tool?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/10/politics/katie-britt-sex-trafficking-victim-interview/index.html

 

[Taurus]

It turns out that the woman the senator lied about is now speaking out and she's ticked off at the senator.

That's on top of the senator being wrong and lying about what happened.

1. The senator didn't meet one on one with the rape survivor.

2. She wasn't trafficked by a drug cartel.

3.She was never trafficked in the USA

4. She was trafficked in 2004 to 2008. When the bush boy was president.

5. She is accusing the senator of exploiting her story for political purposes.

Apparently she sees this the same way I do. I said the senator was exploiting her for political purposes too.

She is very upset with the senator for lying about her and exploiting her.

That senator has no sense of decency.

There is no low too low for republicans these days.

WOW! Sex Trafficking victim Karla Jacinto has some very harsh words for Republican Senator Katie Britt.Britt, who used Jacinto’s story in the GOP response to the State of the Union Address, not only seems to have gotten facts wrong, but she also didn’t ask Jacinto permission to use her story.FACTS:- Jacinto was not trafficked by the drug cartels. She was trafficked by a Pimp.- Jacinto was Trafficked in Mexico — never in the United States.- The events took place under President George W. Bush.Jacinto told CNN:“I hardly ever cooperate with politicians, because it seems to me that they only want an image. They only want a photo — and that to me is not fair… I work as a spokesperson for many victims who have no voice, and I really would like them to be empathetic: all the governors, all the senators, to be empathetic with the issue of human trafficking because there are millions of girls and boys who disappear all the time. People who are really trafficked and abused, as she [Britt] mentioned. And I think she [Britt] should first take into account what really happens before telling a story of that magnitude”Is Britt going to apologize for using Jacinto as a political tool?

https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/10/politics/katie-britt-sex-trafficking-victim-interview/index.html

I wanted to use the laughing emoticon for the last sentence. Of course Britt isn't going to apologize. It's much more likely she accuses this woman of being a Democrat actress, not the real Jacinto.

 

[Optimus Prime]

Why tell this lie at all?

There has to a recent example from the last few years she could have used instead

GOP/Britt had to have known that the truth would come out almost immediately

 

[efil4]

Why tell this lie at all?

There has to a recent example from the last few years she could have used instead

GOP/Britt had to have know that the truth would come out almost immediately

because the target audience isnt interested in truth. Only interested in anecdotes that detract from the current administrations reputation.

If you BELIEVE the lie, is it a lie?

 

[Optimus Prime]

because the target audience isnt interested in truth. Only interested in anecdotes that detract from the current administrations reputation.

If you BELIEVE the lie, is it a lie?

But why lie when the truth will do?

I have zero doubt there is a horrible story out there about a sex trafficked 15 year old that was rescued last year

Why choose an easily discovered lie (or at the very least misleading) when they can slam Biden’s reputation with a story that is 100% true?

 

[coldseat]

But why lie when the truth will do?

I have zero doubt there is a horrible story out there about a sex trafficked 15 year old that was rescued last year

Why choose an easily discovered lie (or at the very least misleading) when they can slam Biden’s reputation with a story that is 100% true?

Because even though she totally lied about this persons story of being sex trafficked, she actually talked to her during her "visit" to the border. Thus, that was the only personal story she knew of that she could retell and it happened at the border (which she wanted to spot light). But since the details of the story didn't conveniently line up with the story Britt wanted to tell, she lied and changed parts of the story to make it what she wanted.

 

[fooferdoggie]

Because even though she totally lied about this persons story of being sex trafficked, she actually talked to her during her "visit" to the border. Thus, that was the only personal story she knew of that she could retell and it happened at the border (which she wanted to spot light). But since the details of the story didn't conveniently line up with the story Britt wanted to tell, she lied and changed parts of the story to make it what she wanted.

Listening to a podcast there is a park in Texas that all these GOP go and visit like its a Zoo to see the illegals.

Texas officers take “full control” of Eagle Pass park against city’s wishes

The city’s mayor was told the state operation to halt illegal border crossings would last indefinitely.

www.texastribune.org

 

[coldseat]

Listening to a podcast there is a park in Texas that all these GOP go and visit like its a Zoo to see the illegals.

Texas officers take “full control” of Eagle Pass park against city’s wishes

The city’s mayor was told the state operation to halt illegal border crossings would last indefinitely.

www.texastribune.org

Yeah, it's Greg Abbots little playground and pony show to demonstrate he's "doing something" about the "illegal" problem. If I were Biden, I would have already activated the Texas National Guard (half of which are already at the park because Abbot activated them) and ordered them to take over the park and allow Border Patrol to have access. But I think Biden is just trying to avoid giving Abbot what he wants by avoiding the spectacle.

The stupid thing about Texas is that the voters here overwhelmingly support Abbot seizing the park and all his pointless actions on the border. The locals and local officials in Eagle Pass hate it and want them gone, but who cares about them.

Meanwhile, Abbot uses the distraction of his circus on the border to do a full court press on funneling money to private schools (i.e. School Choice), something that is overwhelmingly unpopular with voters in the state. But voters would rather vote for pointless state border actions (because MAGA, BORDER ) than on preventing funneling
millions of public money into private schools. So Abbot will get what he wants eventually, such is how things go in Texas.

 

[fooferdoggie]

Yeah, it's Greg Abbots little playground and pony show to demonstrate he's "doing something" about the "illegal" problem. If I were Biden, I would have already activated the Texas National Guard (half of which are already at the park because Abbot activated them) and ordered them to take over the park and allow Border Patrol to have access. But I think Biden is just trying to avoid giving Abbot what he wants by avoiding the spectacle.

The stupid thing about Texas is that the voters here overwhelmingly support Abbot seizing the park and all his pointless actions on the border. The locals and local officials in Eagle Pass hate it and want them gone, but who cares about them.

Meanwhile, Abbot uses the distraction of his circus on the border to do a full court press on funneling money to private schools (i.e. School Choice), something that is overwhelmingly unpopular with voters in the state. But voters would rather vote for pointless state border actions (because MAGA, BORDER ) than on preventing funneling
millions to private schools. So Abbot will get what he wants eventually, such is how things go in Texas.

man dont hold back tell us how you really feel.

 

[coldseat]

man dont hold back tell us how you really feel.

I get very sardonic when it comes to Texas state government and the voters in this state. When someone like Ken Paxton continues to slime his way into office, win overwhelming approval and dismiss every attempt to hold his corrupt arse accountable, that tells you everything you need to know about this state.

 

[LovesMusic7360]

I wanted to use the laughing emoticon for the last sentence. Of course Britt isn't going to apologize. It's much more likely she accuses this woman of being a Democrat actress, not the real Jacinto.

Of course that senator isn't going to apologize.

She has already been on fox liars trying to justify her lies.

She said that the woman went through that nightmare because of Biden's border policies and that's just nothing but a huge lie.

That woman's nightmare was caused by the bush boy and republican's border policy.

 

[MT15]

Of course that senator isn't going to apologize.

She has already been on fox liars trying to justify her lies.

She said that the woman went through that nightmare because of Biden's border policies and that's just nothing but a huge lie.

That woman's nightmare was caused by the bush boy and republican's border policy.

Technically it had nothing to do with the border, though, right? It happened hundreds of miles away from the border.

 

[LovesMusic7360]

because the target audience isnt interested in truth. Only interested in anecdotes that detract from the current administrations reputation.

If you BELIEVE the lie, is it a lie?

Their target audience should be new voters. Not people who are already going to vote for them.

I don't know about most people but this isn't the way to convince me to vote republican.

On top of everything else, it's insulting. I'm insulted that this senator and republicans think I'm that stupid and easily manipulated.

 

[LA - L.A.]

Technically it had nothing to do with the border, though, right? It happened hundreds of miles away from the border.

Jacinta said she was trafficked by a pimp in Mexico and seemed to be explaining that her tragedy was not connected to US border policy or the US.

 

[LovesMusic7360]

Because even though she totally lied about this persons story of being sex trafficked, she actually talked to her during her "visit" to the border. Thus, that was the only personal story she knew of that she could retell and it happened at the border (which she wanted to spot light). But since the details of the story didn't conveniently line up with the story Britt wanted to tell, she lied and changed parts of the story to make it what she wanted.

The senator didn't talk to the woman. The senator was part of a group of people who went to the border.

The woman who survived the nightmare didn't take personally to the senator. She talked to the group. It wasn't a one on one with the senator and the survivor.

 

[LovesMusic7360]

Technically it had nothing to do with the border, though, right? It happened hundreds of miles away from the border.

Yes it was in Guadalajara, which is in the southern third of Mexico and approximately 1400 miles from the US border. It's approximately a 26 hour drive by car.

The woman should have just left that out of her speech.