GrandAdmiral
Well-known member
Offline
Ugh... breaking news I DID NOT want to see.
ETA: Reported on CNN.
ETA: Reported on CNN.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/d-c-...ice-are-hiding-barbaric-crimes-pro-lifers-say
There is a link the twitter thread that shows the bodies of the babies, I encourage everyone to have a look at them. Crazy disturbing but it should show that we are not talking about a 'clump' of cells. Especially the one of the little girl with her eyes open.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/d-c-...ice-are-hiding-barbaric-crimes-pro-lifers-say
There is a link the twitter thread that shows the bodies of the babies, I encourage everyone to have a look at them. Crazy disturbing but it should show that we are not talking about a 'clump' of cells. Especially the one of the little girl with her eyes open.
Sadly, we just have to wait a while, a whole new batch of women will bleed out and die.You know we could counter with (thankfully) older photos of women who bled out in motels and alleys. Except those qualify as obscene because they're largely unclothed.
It wouldn't necessarily alter the court to get pre-approvals for nominees. They could be seated after someone retires. Also, why can't Breyer rescind his retirement?You also wouldn't get enough Senators to go along with any plan to unilaterally alter the Court.
And Emmitt Till was seeking an abortion? I am trying to figure out why you put up this strawman. What does Till have to do with an abortion?Pictures of Emmitt Till are readily available, yet you have a problem with Antilynching Act.
Would those women bleed out if they didn't do something illegal? What are they doing in order to bleed out? An abortion to end a pregnancy? How did they become pregnant? Oh, they chose to have to sex. That sounds a lot like consequences of ones actions. So, it turns out that no women would 'bleed out' if they didn't make a decision to have sex. Seems like it all comes down to abstinence, does it not?Sadly, we just have to wait a while, a whole new batch of women will bleed out and die.
Would those women bleed out if they didn't do something illegal? What are they doing in order to bleed out? An abortion to end a pregnancy? How did they become pregnant? Oh, they chose to have to sex. That sounds a lot like consequences of ones actions. So, it turns out that no women would 'bleed out' if they didn't make a decision to have sex. Seems like it all comes down to abstinence, does it not?
Maybe we need a national push or law for abstinence? That would solve the problem right there would it not?
Just to be clear, I don't condone a national law (for most anything really) for abstinence, but only to make a point.
Would those women bleed out if they didn't do something illegal? What are they doing in order to bleed out? An abortion to end a pregnancy? How did they become pregnant? Oh, they chose to have to sex. That sounds a lot like consequences of ones actions. So, it turns out that no women would 'bleed out' if they didn't make a decision to have sex. Seems like it all comes down to abstinence, does it not?
Maybe we need a national push or law for abstinence? That would solve the problem right there would it not?
Just to be clear, I don't condone a national law (for most anything really) for abstinence, but only to make a point.
And Emmitt Till was seeking an abortion? I am trying to figure out why you put up this strawman. What does Till have to do with an abortion?
Are there also women who bled out during a legal and safe abortion?There are a many things that could happen to cause someone pregnant to bleed out that don't include abortions or anything illegal.
Also I like that children are "consequences" in this one.
A+ Farb posting.
You forgot the whole 'life' part with your Jurassic Park quote.No matter how much you and religious conservatives try, you're never going to be able to force women to carry a pregnancy to term if they want an abortion. Much like the dinosaurs in Jurassic Park, they will find away. All you will do is cause more pain for women and society.
That may be okay with you, but I prefer a more pragmatic approach to abortion.
Man, that word pragmatic brings back some nostalgia. I remember when the right used to champion pragmatism. Now it's all kooks, conspiracy and ultra religious conservatism.
The correlation between a lynching and an abortion? Other than both kill an innocent life, no, I don't.This is not the first time in the past week or so that you have stated an inability to understand a simple concept. Do you genuinely not understand?
You forgot the whole 'life' part with your Jurassic Park quote.
I love nostalgia too so I am with you. Like in the old days when liberals could provide a definition of a woman or girl. And grooming and pedophilia was not considered normal behavior in government schools. Those were wild times.
Did you look at the pictures? There were viable, that is the point and why the state is not doing an investigation.I mean, if aborted fetus can live on its own outside the womb, then by all means.
The point being, you can force people (in this case women) into submission, but only by being authoritarian and using punishing force/incarceration to take away their freedom. Which is essentially what the right wing is trying to do. Otherwise, the will use their freedom to find a way to get an abortion.
Did you look at the pictures? There were viable, that is the point and why the state is not doing an investigation.
Sure. I don't see California outlawing abortion. Use our freedom to go get one, just not in a state that has it's citizens decide that killing babies is not going to happen in their state. See, freedom and democracy in action.