Zuckerberg says Biden/Harris administration pressured Meta to censor COVID-19 content (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    SaintForLife

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages
    7,313
    Reaction score
    3,404
    Location
    Madisonville
    Offline
    Aug 27 (Reuters) - Meta Platforms (META.O), opens new tab CEO Mark Zuckerberg said the Biden administration had pressured the company to "censor" COVID-19 content during the pandemic, apparently referring to White House requests to take down misinformation about the coronavirus and vaccines.

    In a letter dated Aug. 26, Zuckerberg told the U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee that he regretted not speaking up about this pressure earlier, as well as other decisions he had made as the owner of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp around removing certain content.

    In July 2021, President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said social media platforms like Facebook "are killing people" for allowing misinformation about coronavirus vaccines to be posted on its platform.

    Others like former White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki and Surgeon General Vivek Murthy publicly said the company was not doing enough to take down misinformation, and was making it harder to fight the pandemic and save lives.

    ...In the letter to the Republican-controlled House Judiciary Committee on Monday, Zuckerberg said his company was "pressured" into "censoring" content and that the company would push back if it faced such demands again.

    "In 2021, senior officials from the Biden Administration, including the White House, repeatedly pressured our teams for months to censor certain COVID-19 content, including humor and satire, and expressed a lot of frustration with our teams when we didn't agree," Zuckerberg wrote in the letter, which was posted by the Judiciary Committee on its Facebook page.

    "I believe the government pressure was wrong, and I regret we were not more outspoken about it," he wrote. "I also think we made some choices that, with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn't make today."


     
    Do you not understand what the word collude means?
    So I think the Secret Service colluded with Trump to fake the assassination attempt. See how crazy that sounds, because it is not cemented in reality. That is how your FBI collusion with the Biden campaign sounds. There is no evidence at all about that.
    And no I don’t believe the assassination attempt was fake.
     
    And no I don’t believe the assassination attempt was fake.
    However any of us - if we wanted - could pull dozens of posts from Twitter seriously declaring that it was fake. They would all be from dubious sources without any proof, but we could certainly start a thread with them and promote them.

    But that is exactly what SFL is doing with this and other conspiracy theories.
     
    Sure we do. It was what Trump did with Russia.
    Not according to Mueller. Maybe you will find it one day if you keep looking with the Blue Anons.



    1000006153.jpg


    1000006154.png


    1000006155.jpg


    1000006156.png
     
    SFL, can you reflect on the difference between “not enough evidence to charge” and “no evidence”?

    Because we’re not stupid, we know the difference. Fun fact: Mueller also said that it was entirely possible that he couldn’t charge because of the obstruction that Trump carried out during the investigation.
     
    So I think the Secret Service colluded with Trump to fake the assassination attempt. See how crazy that sounds, because it is not cemented in reality. That is how your FBI collusion with the Biden campaign sounds. There is no evidence at all about that.
    And no I don’t believe the assassination attempt was fake.
    The FBI knew it was real, but they still instructed Facebook to censor it. Why would they do that? Can you explain?



    The FBI determined in November 2019 that the laptop was registered to Hunter Biden's Apple iCloud account.

    When the FBI took possession, they confirmed no files had been added to it.

    That was 11 months before the FBI contacted Facebook about suppressing the @nypost story.

     
    SFL - you KNOW the answer to this. The actual laptop and the files released by NY Post are NOT the same. What the FBI has evidently has zero evidence of anything you say otherwise they would be using that data, but they are not. They could only find 2 unrelated spurious charges for Hunter.

    The bastageized files that Rudy, Roger Stone and Bannon put forth DID contain material that had been added. You seem completely unable to wonder -where did those files come from? Who added fhem?

    You have zero clue what you are babbling about. It’s sick is what it is. Go touch grass or something.
     
    SFL - you KNOW the answer to this. The actual laptop and the files released by NY Post are NOT the same. What the FBI has evidently has zero evidence of anything you say otherwise they would be using that data, but they are not. They could only find 2 unrelated spurious charges for Hunter.

    The bastageized files that Rudy, Roger Stone and Bannon put forth DID contain material that had been added. You seem completely unable to wonder -where did those files come from? Who added fhem?

    You have zero clue what you are babbling about. It’s sick is what it is. Go touch grass or something.
    I don't think touching will do the trick. Might need to consume some edibles instead.
     
    Last edited:
    Not according to Mueller. Maybe you will find it one day if you keep looking with the Blue Anons.



    1000006153.jpg


    1000006154.png


    1000006155.jpg


    1000006156.png

    Failure again. Don’t you get tired of being wrong about, well, just about everything you post.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom