Biden says border walls don’t work as administration bypasses laws to build more barriers in South Texas (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    SaintForLife

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 5, 2019
    Messages
    7,313
    Reaction score
    3,404
    Location
    Madisonville
    Offline
    President Joe Biden said Thursday that he doesn’t believe border walls work, even as his administration said it will waive 26 laws to build additional border barriers in the Rio Grande Valley amid heightened political pressure over migration.

    According to a notice posted to the Federal Register Wednesday, construction of the wall will be paid for using already appropriated funds earmarked specifically for physical border barriers. The administration was under a deadline to use them or lose them. But the move comes at a time when a new surge of migrants is straining federal and local resources and placing heavy political pressure on the Biden administration to address a sprawling crisis, and the notice cited “high illegal entry.”

    Biden – who, as a candidate, vowed that there will “not be another foot” of border wall constructed on his watch – defended the decision to reporters Thursday, saying that he tried to get the money appropriated for other purposes but was unsuccessful.

    “I’ll answer one question on the border wall: The border wall – the money was appropriated for the border wall. I tried to get them to reappropriate it, to redirect that money. They didn’t, they wouldn’t. And in the meantime, there’s nothing under the law other than they have to use the money for what it was appropriated. I can’t stop that,” Biden told reporters in the Oval Office.

    Asked whether he believes the border wall works, Biden answered, “No.”

    Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas stated forcefully that there had been no change to the administration’s policy at a news conference in Mexico City on Thursday.

    “I want to address today’s reporting relating to a border wall and be absolutely clear: There is no new administration policy with respect to the border wall,” Mayorkas said. “Allow me to repeat that: There is no new administration policy with respect to the border wall.”

    “We have repeatedly asked Congress to rescind this money, but it has not done so, and we are compelled to follow the law,” he said.

    ...“There is presently an acute and immediate need to construct physical barriers and roads in the vicinity of the border of the United States in order to prevent unlawful entries into the United States in the project areas,” Mayorkas said in the notice.

    ...Among the laws the Biden administration is bypassing to build the wall are several of the same statutes the administration has in the past moved to protect, including: the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act.

     
    Walls have been used for centuries, but let's act like they don't work. Just like my analogy that you refused to respond to, the walls on the border are meant to slow down people trying to cross the border. They aren't meant to stop everyone coming across. The wall is to be used in conjunction with border patrol, sensors, camera's, etc.

    Most politicians want the border wide open as it is now. Republicans want it open for cheap labor and Democrats for whenever they can get amnesty passed in Congress.
    and they have failed over and over. the cost is huge and we can look at Israel on how even the most expensive wall can fail.
     

    If the United States does indeed build a wall along its southern border and then monitors it effectively, it may succeed in curbing illegal immigration, but it will not end it. Walls cannot prevent people from overstaying their visas or being smuggled in another way. And if history is any precedent, illegal immigrants may attempt to tunnel under the wall, go over it or breach it some other way.

    As long as life in the United States offers potential migrants more opportunities and fewer perceived dangers than their home countries, illegal immigration will likely persist.
     
    @SaintForLife

    The second bridge is in Texas and doesn't cross into Mexico.....

    Do you even try?
    I don't live there so I know very little about the area. You said there was no vegetation or trees. Why does this picture from the Washington Post show grass and trees?

    Either way, I'm believing the reporter in the area over your claim.

    Screenshot_20231021_125803_Chrome.jpg

     
    I don't live there so I know very little about the area. You said there was no vegetation or trees. Why does this picture from the Washington Post show grass and trees?

    Either way, I'm believing the reporter in the area over your claim.

    Screenshot_20231021_125803_Chrome.jpg

    Look in your photos. That's tall trees and high grasses.

    You can believe whatever you want. Your inability to think critically is well documented.
     
    Look in your photos. That's tall trees and high grasses.

    You can believe whatever you want. Your inability to think critically is well documented.
    You can't even say where that is eventhough you said its not Eagle Pass. You've shown no evidence that what you claim is correct. You said there was no vegetation or trees. That's not true.
     
    Do you have any walls in your house? Those walls make it harder for someone to get into your house, but it wouldn't stop someone who wanted to get in right?

    For a casual bystander, sure. For someone who wants to get into your house, house walls in the U.S. aren't that thick, and usually made of sheetrock/wood. Very easy to punch a hole in them. Easier to kick down a door or a window, I guess.

    Walls have been used through the ages, but through the ages, they have also fallen. And those walls, have not been 2,000 miles in length. Many people like to point to the Great Wall of China, but even the Great Wall of China wasn't a match for the Japanese, who went into China and killed 10 million + between 1937 and 1945.

    You can punch holes through walls, climb walls, tunnel under walls (el Chapo specials)...

    There are better ways to control immigration/illegal crossings, but one side is too busy living in the 16th century, the other afraid their hearts will bleed out.
     
    Walls have been used for centuries, but let's act like they don't work. Just like my analogy that you refused to respond to, the walls on the border are meant to slow down people trying to cross the border. They aren't meant to stop everyone coming across. The wall is to be used in conjunction with border patrol, sensors, camera's, etc.

    Most politicians want the border wide open as it is now. Republicans want it open for cheap labor and Democrats for whenever they can get amnesty passed in Congress.
    What I am saying is that the particular design that Trump chose is garbage. Expensive and nearly worthless. It would have been much better to spend the money on technology to monitor the border than a big, dumb ugly worthless wall.
     
    What I am saying is that the particular design that Trump chose is garbage. Expensive and nearly worthless. It would have been much better to spend the money on technology to monitor the border than a big, dumb ugly worthless wall.

    If I remember correctly, the design of that wall was a compromise with local officials for flood and environmental concerns to get the wall built faster. It was stupid, but all the Trump administration cared about was getting the wall built quickly.
     


    These numbers do not include ICE or ports of entry releases. For context, 900,000+ is a population size larger than several US states, including Wyoming, Vermont, Alaska, & North & South Dakota. The releases include both Notice to Appears & paroles.

    That's a astonishing amount of people released into the country.
     
    So much for being a sanctuary city. It's amazing that as soon as the big sanctuary cities were forced to deal with the policies they support they fold like a wet blanket.

     
    So much for being a sanctuary city. It's amazing that as soon as the big sanctuary cities were forced to deal with the policies they support they fold like a wet blanket.


    Have you ever, ONCE, considered that NYC is THE largest port of call for all immigration into the US?
     
    Have you ever, ONCE, considered that NYC is THE largest port of call for all immigration into the US?
    They've called themselves a sanctuary city. How hard is it for small border towns to deal with all the illegal immigrants when NYC can't even take care of them? It's about time these sanctuary cities get to deal with the polices they call for and support.
     



    Meanwhile the Biden administration is trying to make it easier for illegal immigrants to come in.

    But the border isnt open...yeah right.
     
    Walls have been used for centuries, but let's act like they don't work. Just like my analogy that you refused to respond to, the walls on the border are meant to slow down people trying to cross the border. They aren't meant to stop everyone coming across. The wall is to be used in conjunction with border patrol, sensors, camera's, etc.

    Most politicians want the border wide open as it is now. Republicans want it open for cheap labor and Democrats for whenever they can get amnesty passed in Congress.
    Ask the Chinese. The Great Wall didn’t work. Ask the French. The Maginot line didn’t work.

    Large scale population migrations require actual solutions.
     
    They've called themselves a sanctuary city. How hard is it for small border towns to deal with all the illegal immigrants when NYC can't even take care of them? It's about time these sanctuary cities get to deal with the polices they call for and support.
    NYC deals with far more immigrants than any town in TX. Far, far more. All of the time. What they are doing now is dealing with all their own immigrants plus the ones that are being illegally moved by the TX Governor. NY state is about 23% foreign born, 3rd highest in US. TX is about 17%.

    Do you have any idea why the razor wire is a bad idea?
     
    They've called themselves a sanctuary city. How hard is it for small border towns to deal with all the illegal immigrants when NYC can't even take care of them? It's about time these sanctuary cities get to deal with the polices they call for and support.
    Have you ever, ONCE, considered that NYC is THE largest port of call for all immigration into the US?
     
    I live in a Sanctuary City.

    It just means we won't deport you if you report crime or witness a crime and come forward.

    See, we think it is probably more important that a witness to a murder come forward instead of fearing repercussions and sending the single individual back to their country of origin.

    A whole lot more important.
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom