Trump Tracker Too (2 Trump 2 Tracker) (2 Viewers)

Users who are viewing this thread

    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    EmBeeFiveOhFour

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Oct 1, 2019
    Messages
    636
    Reaction score
    1,952
    Location
    Near a River's Bend
    Offline
    The football board had the very useful Daily Trump Tracker thread, which was a good place to briefly discuss the latest ridiculous thing that might have ended 97% of prior Presidential administrations even if it didn't necessarily justify an entire thread devoted to it in 2017-2019 (because of the sheer volume of these things). Since I don't see anything like that here already, I'll add one myself.
     
    I have said and believed for years that healthcare would be one of the make or break issues. It affects everyone. and it’s an area where Trump and the GOP couldn’t have given less of a damn.

    this was amplified by COVID.

    the passing of RBG as the SC is hearing arguments over the ACA amplifies it even more.

    I don’t know how Biden isn’t already screaming this from the rooftops. Stealing from FEMA to fund his wall. Ending Medicare and Social Security. Taking away insurance protections.

    Did you get COVID? Guess what - you have a pre-existing condition and Trump wants to take your insurance away or allow companies to price gouge you.

    I am genuinely surprised that Trumps total and utter disregard for healthcare hasn’t really been broadcast more broadly.

    well it seems Trump got this memo and began touting some utopian ideal spouting rhetoric about the America First Healthcare Plan which isn’t actually a plan. Just a series of empty promises with no details.

    might as well say the Covid cure is a part of it.

    but my hope is sincere that this means healthcare is going to get Primetime attention in this election
     
    I read he hasn’t given up on sending money cards to senior citizens to help them buy their prescriptions. The figures I saw said he wants to take $7 billion (? - not sure) out of the Treasury to pay for it and says the money will come from future savings of his medical programs. 🤪

    Said to be $200 each person, so not sure what the rest of that money is for. hella overhead. Oh, and the cards will be distributed before the election, lol.
     
    Fighting tribalism with tribalism isn't guaranteed to be a winning strategy in the long term.
    I"m not looking at this from a tribe perspective and I'm looking at it from a different practical point of view than being shackled to tradition just for the sake of tradition.

    The tribalism perspective is concerned about sliding down a slippery slope into a never ending cycle of tribal one-upmanship. That would be less than ideal and have many disadvantages, but at least that never-ending cycle would be one of power and advantage flowing back and forth between different groups.

    So what if the court is ever expanding? What's the harm in that, other than breaking from tradition? How would our citizenry be adversely affected by an ever expanding court?

    The slippery slope into never ending tribal one-upmanship is not the only slippery slope that exists. The packing of the Supreme Court by McConnell. and some Republicans is part of our continual slide down a slippery slope into tyranny by a minority. That is a much more dangerous slope to keep sliding down.

    The only way to stop sliding down the slope toward that tyranny is to start undoing the successes that they have had. At all other levels of our society, we do our best to not let wrong doers get away with their wrong doing. McConnell and some Republicans wrong doing to slide us farther down the slope toward tyranny by the minority shouldn't be any different.

    We should do everything we can to undo the wrong doings of McConnell and the Republicans that have supported him.

    It is better to live with a conservative majority in the short term and play the long game.
    That's an opinion that I completely reject. I see that as apathy, since no long term strategy has actually been offered up. It's another instance of telling people specifically what they shouldn't do, without offering any relevant specifics on what they should do. I find that approach questionable and unconvincing. It's easy to tell people what they shouldn't do, but actionable solutions come from telling people what they could do.

    Naysayers say nay, problem solvers offer solutions.

    How is adding adding Puerto Rico and DC as states a long game? How is it supposed to unpack a corruptly packed Supreme Court? How does it get us off of the slippery slope into tyranny by the minority?

    We have this corruptly packed conservative majority on the Supreme Court because corrupt Repulicans have been playing a long game slowly sliding us farther down the slippery slope into tyranny by the minority. They have been playing this long game for over 40 years.

    The currently packed Supreme Court is a crucial part of their long game. "Living with it" plays right into their long term strategy and goals.

    The tyrants of history owe their successes more to the general apathy of a society than they do to their fervent supporters.

    To rephrase Edmund Burke - The only thing necessary for the triumph of tyrants is for good citizens to do nothing and tyrants can't triumph unless good citizens do nothing.

    The time to just "live with" corruption and do nothing about the slide into tyranny by the minority is over. We've "lived with" and done nothing for too long. We've run out of time and the luxury of "living with" and doing nothing.

    History is also littered with people telling other people, "don't be so alarmist, everything's going to be fine," just days and even hours before everything went very badly.

    If we keep "living with" and doing nothing thinking everything is going to be fine, then things are at a high risk of getting very bad, very soon. History is littered with examples of this and we are all a part of living history.
     
    Last edited:
    That's an opinion that I completely reject. I see that as apathy,
    I think an even better analogy might be Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement policy.

    Simply allowing Republicans to get away with unchecked, tyrannical advances in the hopes that at some point they’ll simply be satisfied and stop advancing is a sucker bet.
     
    I read he hasn’t given up on sending money cards to senior citizens to help them buy their prescriptions. The figures I saw said he wants to take $7 billion (? - not sure) out of the Treasury to pay for it and says the money will come from future savings of his medical programs. 🤪

    Said to be $200 each person, so not sure what the rest of that money is for. hella overhead. Oh, and the cards will be distributed before the election, lol.

    I just envision him and Dejoy looking down from above postal sorting machines yelling

    Turn those machines back ooooon!!!
     
    Not surprised

    Actually, I am a little surprised

    I’m sure they’d have no problem finding supporters to say that Trump is the greatest human being to ever live including George Washington and Jesus

    Why do this at all?
    =================================

    President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign is currently running Facebook ads with “real people” who support the president. And while it’s accurate to say these people are “real” in the sense that they’re human beings and not robots from the TV show Westworld, they’re not just average people off the street. Many are political operatives.

    Take this ad that’s currently running on Facebook. It shows Kim Sherk, who’s not identified by name in the ad, and yet is the president of the Georgia Federation of Republican Women.

    A Georgia newspaper, the Marietta Daily Journal recognized Sherk, which might be why these ads are running in states like California, Illinois, and Mississippi, according to the Facebook ad library, rather than her home state of Georgia.........

    Another ad currently being run by the Trump campaign on Facebook shows viewers a group of people sitting in a circle and talking about the dangers of a potential Biden presidency. While it might look like a typical focus group, featuring average people off the street, the video is anything but.

    Some of the people in the video are former and aspiring politicians, including one woman who’s currently running for the U.S. House in Minnesota and a man who was a delegate at the Republican National Convention in both 2016 and 2020.......



    My friend, who is very much a democrat, got an e-mail asking if she wanted to make $25/hr to go stand around campaign spots, or events. I guess to drum up a crowd. I think they all do it, just kinda funny.
     


    1601004242172.png
     
    How is adding adding Puerto Rico and DC as states a long game? How is it supposed to unpack a corruptly packed Supreme Court? How does it get us off of the slippery slope into tyranny by the minority?
    It has the possibility to add four Democrat seats to the Senate. And that's relatively immediate action. In 2022, there are a decent amount of GOP Senate seats that could be vulnerable: Marco Rubio in Florida, an open seat in North Carolina, Pat Toomey in Pennslyvania, Rob Portman in Ohio, and Ron Johnson in Wisconsin. Most, if not all, of the Democrat seats coming up in 2022 are fairly secure. Then demographics (shifting Texas) are helping in the long-term. Control the Senate and you control the federal courts.

    Currently, the Republicans look like the power-grabbers to the independent/moderate voter. If you let them be the foil then their influence erodes. You can use that against them in 2022. Radical counter-measures risk shifting public perception against Democrats. Then you could be starting at a Republican Senate and President Tom Cotton in 2024.
     
    Last edited:
    It has the possibility to add four Democrat seats to the Senate. And that's relatively immediate action. Then demographics (shifting Texas) are helping in the long-term. Control the Senate and you control the federal courts.
    It also has the possibility of adding Republicans to the Senate. It doesn't undo the damage that has already been done. Supreme Court appointments are lifetime appointments. McConnell made sure to pack the court with justices that will serve for decades. Adding Puerto Rico and DC's as states seems to be more of a pacifier at best, than an actual undoing of the corrupt packing of the Supreme Court that has occured.

    Democrats controlled the Senate and Obama still couldn't get judges appointed to the federal courts.

    The Democrats had to remove the filibuster just to fill some of the federal court vacancies. That move by them was said to be tribalism which is said to be bad, but now the tribalism of packing the Senate is being offered as a solution?

    How is packing the Senate okay, but packing the Supreme Court isn't? How is that not going to set off a vicious, tribal cycle of retaliation?

    What's the harm of an ever expanding Supreme Court?

    I see inconsistencies in values and logic from suggesting this as a long game solution to undo the corrupt packing of the Supreme Court by McConnell and the Republicans that supported them.

    It was very important to them to pack the Supreme Court, so it should be very important to us to unpack it ASAP, not generations from now.
     
    The time to just "live with" corruption and do nothing about the slide into tyranny by the minority is over. We've "lived with" and done nothing for too long. We've run out of time and the luxury of "living with" and doing nothing.
    You damn skippy just living with it is over. So is turning the other cheek with respect to Republicans and what they will do to retain power. Look no further than the what they are doing with this supreme court nomination. Republicans are the strongest of the strong believers in "do as I say, not as I do". Republican voters have more than demonstrated that they are willing to accept blatant hypocrisy from Republicans as long as they keep power. The religious right have more than demonstrated no fear of a judgment from the God they claimed to believe in an love so much as long as they keep power. Democrats are finally coming around to understanding that "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice........you can't get fooled again."
    History is also littered with people telling other people, "don't be so alarmist, everything things going to be fine," just days and even hours before everything went very badly.
    Covid-19 says hello.
     
    Given that Congress has not approved a new Covid-aid package, this is clearly the president using the federal fisc as a campaign resource. He's planning on sending out $200 drug discount cards to seniors from a funding source that doesn't exist.

    I can't express enough how illegal and inappropriate this is.


     
    Given that Congress has not approved a new Covid-aid package, this is clearly the president using the federal fisc as a campaign resource. He's planning on sending out $200 drug discount cards to seniors from a funding source that doesn't exist.

    I can't express enough how illegal and inappropriate this is.





    Spending money he DOESNT have?

    Ever dealt with a developer? Thats EXACTLY what they do. Spend money based on projected numbers.

    Leopards dont change their spots.
     
    Saw this this morning and I agree

    Wanted to put this here before it was deleted on SR

    I hope you don't mind

    The Trump presidency has exposed a lot that may have been suspected but only now has been confirmed.

    The religious right are blatant hypocrites who willingly ignore the teachings that they profess so vehemently to follow as long as they have power

    Republican voters who claim to love this country and its flag so much only do so if the people they vote for win. They will accept unchecked spending without paying for it and have no problem with welfare.

    Republicans embrace these groups that have lived on the fringes. Look no further than the growth of the colossally stupid and gullible QAnon believers

    Republican politicians are seasoned liars and hypocrites. Graham, Grassley, McConnell and the whole lot of them. That's not to say that Democrats don't have their share of liars and hypocrites. It's to say that Republican liars and hypocrites are on tape doing what they do.

    Republicans are strong believers in the rules are thee, not for me.

    The presidency of Barack Obama drove republicans over the edge. He was the last straw for them to drop all pretenses of being fair and honest in governing.
     
    Given that Congress has not approved a new Covid-aid package, this is clearly the president using the federal fisc as a campaign resource. He's planning on sending out $200 drug discount cards to seniors from a funding source that doesn't exist.

    I can't express enough how illegal and inappropriate this is.



    It's literally buying votes. The reason they want another stimulus check is also to buy votes. The last one was too far away from the election to be effective in changing someone's mind, so they need another one.
     
    It's literally buying votes. The reason they want another stimulus check is also to buy votes. The last one was too far away from the election to be effective in changing someone's mind, so they need another one.

    At least a stimulus check from Congress has an ostensible basis in both pandemic relief and appropriations law.
     
    Saw this this morning and I agree

    Wanted to put this here before it was deleted on SR

    I hope you don't mind
    Not at all. I went a little overboard on the EE. I'm glad you were able to save it and post it here.

    ETA ... that's the first time I have ever liked my own post.
     
    A reminder of why Trump very carefully chooses what rare public events to attend unless his campaign controls who the audience is:


    Can we just take a minute to recognize how surreal this is?

    I mean, presidents have been heckled, even booed by hostile crowds. But at a funeral with a Supreme Court Justice's body just a few feet away? I can't imagine in any other presidency a situation where a crowd is booing the president standing at the casket of a deceased justice.

    I would argue that it was disrespectful to RBG if it weren't for the fact that his presence at the funeral for a photo op is more disrespectful.
     
    Status
    Not open for further replies.

    Advertisement

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Sponsored

    Back
    Top Bottom