Trump’s assault on Universities (1 Viewer)

Users who are viewing this thread

    MT15

    Well-known member
    Joined
    Mar 13, 2019
    Messages
    26,241
    Reaction score
    38,506
    Location
    Midwest
    Online
    I thought we had a thread just about Trump’s illegal attacks on American universities, especially some of our very best. Harvard has decided to fight back, while Yale and Columbia have basically rolled over. Trump had been using the excuse of rooting out anti-semitism, which MAGA actually cares nothing about, but it at least provided a paper-thin veneer of a reason. The latest letter sent to Harvard, announcing they will no longer receive any federal grants, discards that excuse. An Atlantic article about this letter:

    “The intensely hostile letter that Education Secretary Linda McMahon sent to the leadership of Harvard yesterday has a lot going on. But the most notable thing about it is what it leaves out.

    To hear McMahon tell it, Harvard is a university on the verge of ruin. (I say McMahon because her signature is at the bottom of the letter, but portions of the document are written in such a distinctive idiolect—“Why is there so much HATE?” the letter asks; it signs off with “Thank you for your attention to this matter!”—that one detects the spirit of a certain uncredited co-author.) She accuses it of admitting students who are contemptuous of America, chastises it for hiring the former blue-city mayors Bill de Blasio and Lori Lightfoot to teach leadership (“like hiring the captain of the Titanic to teach navigation”), questions the necessity of its remedial-math program (“Why is it, we ask, that Harvard has to teach simple and basic mathematics?”), and accuses its board chair, Penny Pritzker (“a Democrat operative”), of driving the university to financial ruin, among many other complaints. The upshot is that Harvard should not bother to apply for any new federal funding, because, McMahon declares, “today’s letter marks the end of new grants for the University.”

    What you will not find in the McMahon letter is any mention of the original justification for the Trump administration’s ongoing assault on elite universities: anti-Semitism. As a legal pretext for trying to financially hobble the Ivy League, anti-Semitism had some strategic merit. Many students and faculty justifiably feel that these schools failed to take harassment of Jews seriously enough during the protests that erupted after the October 7, 2023, terrorist attack on Israel by Hamas. By centering its critique on that issue, the administration was cannily appropriating for its own ends one of the progressive left’s highest priorities: protecting a minority from hostile acts.

    Now, however, the mask is off. Aside from one oblique reference to congressional hearings about anti-Semitism (“the great work of Congresswoman Elise Stefanik”), the letter is silent on the subject. The administration is no longer pretending that it is standing up for Jewish students. The project has been revealed for what it is: an effort to punish liberal institutions for the crime of being liberal.”

    It simply amazes me that this letter was actually sent. It seems to suggest a First Amendment violation is being committed by the Trump Administration. I am so sick of these morons.
     
    Last edited:
    A Great response from Harvard. What better to do than to offer free online courses in US government, US constitution, Civic engagement etc..

    https://pll.harvard.edu/subject/government

    1748200736018.png
     
    U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he is considering taking $3 billion of previously awarded grant money for scientific and engineering research away from Harvard University and giving it to trade schools.

    His comments on his social media platform Truth Social come less than a week after his administration sought to block the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign students as part of Trump’s extraordinary effort to seize some government control of U.S. academia.

    Trump, a Republican, has frozen some $3 billion in federal grants to Harvard in recent weeks, complaining that it has hired Democrats, “Radical Left idiots and ‘bird brains’” as professors. Harvard, a private university, has sued to restore the funding, saying the cuts are an unconstitutional attack on its free speech rights and unlawful.

    Most of that grant money is appropriated by Congress for the National Institutes of Health to disburse to fund biomedical research after a lengthy application process by individual scientists, work that is not typically done at trade schools.…….

     
    CNN) — The Trump administration is poised to direct federal agencies to cancel their contracts – totaling about $100 million – with Harvard University, two senior Trump administration officials told CNN, the latest barb against the school as it refuses to bend to the White House’s weekslong barrage of policy demands rooted in political ideology.

    The directive will be delivered Tuesday in a letter and also will order government agencies to look for new vendors to which they can redirect the federal funds, the officials said.

    The General Services Administration “will send a letter to federal agencies today asking them to identify any contracts with Harvard, and whether they can be canceled or redirected elsewhere,” one senior Trump administration official told CNN.

    The New York Times first reported on the planned cuts.

    The nation’s oldest and wealthiest university sued the Trump administration last month over its freeze of $2.2 billion in federal grants and contracts.

    The government since then has halted another $450 million to Harvard and canceled its ability to enroll foreign students, a move that’s subject to a status conference Tuesday after a federal judge put it on hold.

    Trump further has threatened to cut off $3 billion more in Harvard’s federal grant funding and pull its tax-exempt status………


     
    U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he is considering taking $3 billion of previously awarded grant money for scientific and engineering research away from Harvard University and giving it to trade schools.

    His comments on his social media platform Truth Social come less than a week after his administration sought to block the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign students as part of Trump’s extraordinary effort to seize some government control of U.S. academia.

    Trump, a Republican, has frozen some $3 billion in federal grants to Harvard in recent weeks, complaining that it has hired Democrats, “Radical Left idiots and ‘bird brains’” as professors. Harvard, a private university, has sued to restore the funding, saying the cuts are an unconstitutional attack on its free speech rights and unlawful.

    Most of that grant money is appropriated by Congress for the National Institutes of Health to disburse to fund biomedical research after a lengthy application process by individual scientists, work that is not typically done at trade schools.…….

    That article doesn’t address the illegality of what Trump is proposing. He cannot just redirect money allocated by Congress for a specific purpose to a different purpose. That’s a shameful omission.
     
    U.S. President Donald Trump said on Monday he is considering taking $3 billion of previously awarded grant money for scientific and engineering research away from Harvard University and giving it to trade schools.

    His comments on his social media platform Truth Social come less than a week after his administration sought to block the Ivy League school from enrolling foreign students as part of Trump’s extraordinary effort to seize some government control of U.S. academia.

    Trump, a Republican, has frozen some $3 billion in federal grants to Harvard in recent weeks, complaining that it has hired Democrats, “Radical Left idiots and ‘bird brains’” as professors. Harvard, a private university, has sued to restore the funding, saying the cuts are an unconstitutional attack on its free speech rights and unlawful.

    Most of that grant money is appropriated by Congress for the National Institutes of Health to disburse to fund biomedical research after a lengthy application process by individual scientists, work that is not typically done at trade schools.…….


    You could see it coming from a mile away. A couple posts from 2022.

    I’ve been saying for awhile that the dark side of the push for trade schools over college is less about getting people good jobs and more about de-educating the populace.

    Like I said before - the push for trade schools is not unrelated to the demonization of education in our country. The fewer people that go to college, the fewer Democratic voters there are.
     
    That article doesn’t address the illegality of what Trump is proposing. He cannot just redirect money allocated by Congress for a specific purpose to a different purpose. That’s a shameful omission.

    Trump doesn't care about the law and as long as no one holds him responsible - this is going to continue and escalate
     
    Straight from the Authoritarian Playbook:
    • Undermine the free press – Discredit journalists and media outlets to control the narrative.
    • Attack the legal system – Target judges and law firms that uphold the rule of law and challenge unlawful actions.
    • Purge the military – Remove or sideline officials who may resist unconstitutional or illegal orders.
    • Suppress education and critical thought – Undermine schools, universities, and libraries while promoting state-aligned propaganda.
    None of these tactics are new. What Trump is doing has been seen before—repeated throughout history in regimes that veered into authoritarianism.

    The real question is: How will this end?
    Will the American people rise—peacefully or forcefully, as seen in places like Brazil or Bulgaria—to reclaim their democracy? Or will they retreat into silence, pretending all is well, hoping they won’t be next?

    History teaches us that silence and denial often come at a devastating cost.
     


    FULL TEXT:

    There is an extraordinary "reproducibility crisis" in the sciences, particularly in biology, where most published papers fail to replicate.

    Most universities have massive bureaucracies that inhibit the translation of basic research into commercial adoption.

    The voting patterns of university professors are so one-sided that they look like the election results of North Korea. And on top of all of this, many universities explicitly engage in racial discrimination (mostly against whites and asians) that violates the civil rights laws of this country.

    Our universities could see the policies of the Trump administration as a necessary corrective to these problems, change their policies, and work with the administration to reform.

    Or, they could yell "fascism" at basic democratic accountability and drift further into irrelevance.
     
    It’s clear that Vance misunderstands the basic principles of a functioning democracy if he equates the political leanings of university professors with the election results of North Korea. In a democracy, people are free to vote and express views based on their values, not by some enforced ideological quota. The fact that many academics lean a certain way isn’t evidence of authoritarianism — it’s evidence of free thought.

    So is Trump's policy goal really to "correct" the voting patterns of university faculty? That sounds far more like authoritarian social engineering than any defense of democratic norms.

    And let’s talk about the so-called “corrections” this administration has already begun. Just look at who’s being fired or marginalized: primarily women and minorities. The so-called war on DEI is not about “civil rights” — it's an open attempt to roll back protections and opportunities for historically marginalized groups. Accusing others of discrimination while openly targeting these communities is projection at best, and deliberate gaslighting at worst.

    As for the criticisms of academia — yes, there are legitimate discussions to be had about reproducibility and bureaucracy. But purging institutions of dissenting views, defunding research, and installing ideologically loyal overseers does nothing to improve science or innovation. It only stifles it. If anything is drifting into irrelevance, it’s the idea that censorship, loyalty tests, and institutional purges are somehow compatible with democratic accountability. That’s not reform. That’s regression.
     
    It’s clear that Vance misunderstands the basic principles of a functioning democracy if he equates the political leanings of university professors with the election results of North Korea. In a democracy, people are free to vote and express views based on their values, not by some enforced ideological quota. The fact that many academics lean a certain way isn’t evidence of authoritarianism — it’s evidence of free thought.

    So is Trump's policy goal really to "correct" the voting patterns of university faculty? That sounds far more like authoritarian social engineering than any defense of democratic norms.

    And let’s talk about the so-called “corrections” this administration has already begun. Just look at who’s being fired or marginalized: primarily women and minorities. The so-called war on DEI is not about “civil rights” — it's an open attempt to roll back protections and opportunities for historically marginalized groups. Accusing others of discrimination while openly targeting these communities is projection at best, and deliberate gaslighting at worst.

    As for the criticisms of academia — yes, there are legitimate discussions to be had about reproducibility and bureaucracy. But purging institutions of dissenting views, defunding research, and installing ideologically loyal overseers does nothing to improve science or innovation. It only stifles it. If anything is drifting into irrelevance, it’s the idea that censorship, loyalty tests, and institutional purges are somehow compatible with democratic accountability. That’s not reform. That’s regression.

    This may be one of the best uses of the phrase that applies to this Vance nonsense (especially the NK professor comment).....Every accusation is a confession
     
    We can laugh at it and mock it but this a huge reason why they win elections; telling bald faced lies and getting people to believe them
    Indeed.

    Pathetic truth about their lies is that they are all easily proven lies, yet Republican voters eat it up. I'm certain that the comment sections on Twitter are full of cheers from his supporters, much like the comments about trump "winning" his Pulitzer lawsuit. :jpshakehead:
     
    Indeed.

    Pathetic truth about their lies is that they are all easily proven lies, yet Republican voters eat it up. I'm certain that the comment sections on Twitter are full of cheers from his supporters, much like the comments about trump "winning" his Pulitzer lawsuit. :jpshakehead:
    No doubt

    Helped by right wing news sources towing the party line and never saying otherwise combined with completely ripping to shreds anyone who would say otherwise, "no good, fake news lamestream media, whining snowflake libs, now add judges to the list"

    "anyone who says we're lying to you are really the ones lying to you"

    and it works
     

    Create an account or login to comment

    You must be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create account

    Create an account on our community. It's easy!

    Log in

    Already have an account? Log in here.

    General News Feed

    Fact Checkers News Feed

    Back
    Top Bottom